Do you consider homosexuality to be a problem that the government needs to address?

[Nitemare]

Originally posted by: Capt Caveman

Originally posted by: OdiN
I think it's worth some funding to find a cure. But other than that....meh.

A cure for what?

wasteful spending, hypocrisy and the inability to do your job effectively?

 

[OdiN]

Originally posted by: Capt Caveman

Originally posted by: OdiN
I think it's worth some funding to find a cure. But other than that....meh.

A cure for what?

A cure for homosexuality. What else?

 

[Capt Caveman]

Originally posted by: Nitemare

Originally posted by: Capt Caveman

Originally posted by: OdiN
I think it's worth some funding to find a cure. But other than that....meh.

A cure for what?

wasteful spending, hypocrisy and the inability to do your job effectively?

Then I'm fooked!

 

[George P Burdell]

1. Homosexuality isn't a problem.
2. I'd like the government to handle hunger, disease and war, not homosexuality, steroids in basketball and prostitutes.
3. Every time our government starts legislating homosexuality, it brings us one step closer to this.
4. Fuck you, state of GA, for telling me that everything but missionary position is ILLEGAL. My girl and I will do it in any position we damn well please.

 

[Capt Caveman]

Originally posted by: OdiN

Originally posted by: Capt Caveman

Originally posted by: OdiN
I think it's worth some funding to find a cure. But other than that....meh.

A cure for what?

A cure for homosexuality. What else?

You should ban yourself.

 

[Vic]

Originally posted by: Ryan
I still don't understand what the people entrenched in the war against homos have at stake in the fight.

Conformity. The righteous people who part their hair on the right are at war with those evildoers who part on the left.

 

[Mermaidman]

Your question
"Do you consider homosexuality to be a problem that the government needs to address?"
is too vague.

Are you asking if the govt needs to stop homosexuality, a "problem?"
Are you asking if the govt should protect homosexuals from discrimination?
Are you asking if the govt should stay out of the bedroom and not interfere at all?

Topic=Fail

 

[DangerAardvark]

I fear the homosexuals and their sinister agenda of becoming socially accepted.

 

[Platypus]

god damn it, another one?

this is going to go the same place all the pointless religion threads here go: nowhere fast.

 

[Ryan]

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: Ryan
I still don't understand what the people entrenched in the war against homos have at stake in the fight.

Conformity. The righteous people who part their hair on the right are at war with those evildoers who part on the left.

I'm fucked then, I spike it all up

 

[MrWizzard]

Originally posted by: BrownTown

Originally posted by: Marlin1975

Originally posted by: JulesMaximus

Originally posted by: ducci
Does the government address Down Syndrome?

Now 6% of the world has down syndrome (DS) yet 8-10% of the world is gay. (Stats I got from other sites so i don;t know how true they are).

Why is it that gays get more bs from republicans, religious, and other nut jobs yet those with DS get a pass?

Because you don't choose to have down syndrome and you do choose whether or not to have gay sex maybe...

also the government does adress Downs, if you have it you get disability benefits from the government.

That's what I believe, it's a choice that being said I do not think the government has the right to interfere unless they are breaking a law somewhere.

I am stating this putting my moral beliefs aside.

 

[Nitemare]

Originally posted by: DangerAardvark
I fear the homosexuals and their sinister agenda of becoming socially accepted.

Ain't nothing wrong with 2 attractive girls making out

 

[legoman666]

Originally posted by: paulxcook
The issue they need to address is how to stop spending my money on stupid crap.

al la Baseball bullshit.

 

[HardcoreRobot]

not a problem, and DEFINITELY not something the government should be involved with

 

[pontifex]

Originally posted by: Mermaidman
Your question
"Do you consider homosexuality to be a problem that the government needs to address?"
is too vague.

Are you asking if the govt needs to stop homosexuality, a "problem?"
Are you asking if the govt should protect homosexuals from discrimination?
Are you asking if the govt should stay out of the bedroom and not interfere at all?

Topic=Fail

Other than YAHT, I wouldn't say its a failed topic, its just quite a loaded question.

 

[ConstipatedVigilante]

Originally posted by: Nitemare
Frankly, I get tired of the government dictating morality. Last time i checked, that wasn't their job.

Amen. We should allowed to do whatever we want, as long as it doesn't hurt other people.

 

[Vic]

Originally posted by: Ryan

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: Ryan
I still don't understand what the people entrenched in the war against homos have at stake in the fight.

Conformity. The righteous people who part their hair on the right are at war with those evildoers who part on the left.

I'm fucked then, I spike it all up

Oh, you're in for the tar and feathers now. How dare you be different!

 

[clamum]

Yeah, it should execute homophobes.

 

[Kadarin]

Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Why is it that gays get more bs from republicans, religious, and other nut jobs yet those with DS get a pass?

Because it has to do with sexuality, and urges that get repressed. Cognitive dissonance is a fascinating thing.

 

[rasczak]

Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Answer truthfully now.

Seriously, I was thinking about this after that thread on that nutball congresswoman from Oklahoma or where ever the fuck she was from.

Personally, I think politicians should shut the hell up about religion and sexuality. Too often they end up sticking their jackbooted foot in their pie hole anyway either by words or by their actions (tapping foot in the mens room at an airport for example). Homosexuality is not a problem anyone needs to address...especially not our government.

I voted no to the question, but a more serious problem we should vote on is Jules spelling pole correctly

it's POLL

 

[DangerAardvark]

Originally posted by: Nitemare

Originally posted by: DangerAardvark
I fear the homosexuals and their sinister agenda of becoming socially accepted.

Ain't nothing wrong with 2 attractive girls making out

That's just the bait. Before you know it, it's two slightly uglier girls making out. Then it's one butch and one fem. And then, next thing you know you're livin' in a van down by the river.

 

[JulesMaximus]

Originally posted by: OdiN

Originally posted by: Capt Caveman

Originally posted by: OdiN
I think it's worth some funding to find a cure. But other than that....meh.

A cure for what?

A cure for homosexuality. What else?

Why do we need to cure it? That's like trying to find a cure for being black.

 

[dbk]

I have no interest in knowing what goes on in someone else's bedroom...only in mine.

 

[Vette73]

Originally posted by: JulesMaximus

Originally posted by: OdiN

Originally posted by: Capt Caveman

Originally posted by: OdiN
I think it's worth some funding to find a cure. But other than that....meh.

A cure for what?

A cure for homosexuality. What else?

Why do we need to cure it? That's like trying to find a cure for being black.

Already found, M. Jackson has a patent on it and won;t share.

 

[rasczak]

Originally posted by: Marlin1975

Originally posted by: JulesMaximus

Originally posted by: OdiN

Originally posted by: Capt Caveman

Originally posted by: OdiN
I think it's worth some funding to find a cure. But other than that....meh.

A cure for what?

A cure for homosexuality. What else?

Why do we need to cure it? That's like trying to find a cure for being black.

Already found, M. Jackson has a patent on it and won;t share.

his is not a solution but a disease that he could not say yay or nay to. and he's still semi black, i think