Originally posted by: QuitBanningMe
Originally posted by: MadCowDisease
Originally posted by: QuitBanningMe
It depends, if you think God is a person next door, then yes.... all of the traditional views of God are logically impossible.
If they are logically impossible then you should be able to explain why God in traditional form can't exist. Proceed.
So what you're saying is that until proven otherwise, God does exist?
If you want to say that I can't say that God can't exist, then fine. But under those grounds you can't say that he does, so don't go around saying that he can exist.
Hope you got all of that.
Your little spill assumes that I say he does or exist. What I said was that it is not logically impossible.[/quote]
Which means you're saying that it IS POSSIBLE that he exist. What, in fact you are saying is a very clever way of neither making a statement nor denying that you did not make a statement by use of ambiguity. In fact, what you're actually doing is not making a statement at all, not taking a position.
The only problem is that there is no way to be perfectly agnostic, except to suspend judgment entirely (which you haven't done, assuming it is even possible): you fall, in some small way, to one side or the other - and in this case, the way you've written the statement shows us exactly on which side you fall.
