<< classy
and why is that? >>
I am not a fan of OJ in any way. But it is pretty clear IMHO he didn't kill those two people. Only people who watched the bulk of the case would like myself would have many of the same doubts. I guess the jurors felt the same way. Some of the biggest reasons I doubt he did it?
1. It was clear that both Nicole and Ron Goldman had a struggle with who killed them. But outside of one cut on OJ's hand there was no scratches or marks at all on his entire body. That is really significant because they found skin under Nicole's fingernails that did not match OJ or Ron Goldman and it wasn't her own. Ron Goldmans hand was bruised to the point they speculate he hit the person hard several times while being assaulted.
2. There is no way he could have cleaned himself up and drove back to his house in that short amount of time. He would of had to be doing some serious speeding. That also would attract some on lookers. But no seen anything out of the ordinary.
3. With the amount of blood that was at the crime scene and man it was a lot. There is no way that only a couple specs of blood that Mark Furman found would even remotely make sense.
4. Where did he wash away all the blood? They checked his drain pipes and everything? He couldn't have stop some where and done it in that short amount of time. They found no traces of blood at all. If you don't know you can't wash away blood.
5. Mark Furman. This guy clearly planted that glove and there is no way you can see a spec of blood the size of pin drop from 25 feet away at 11'o'clock at night. Impossible.
6. The video cast some serious doubt as well. Remember they found no blood no where in OJ's house. But yet they supposedly found a pair of bloody socks by OJ's bed. But he has white rugs. How could a man walk across a white rug now with bloody shoes or socks and there be no traces of blood anywhere on the rug? Hmmmmmm......
7. Also with the bloody socks, they were taping the search of OJ's house. They showed the timer in the bottom of the screen of the film. Where they found the socks, the video was taken that went by there earlier and there was no socks in that spot then? So how did they get there.
8. This is the one that sold me on the fact they tried to plant blood evidence against OJ? The day after when OJ was questioned and photgraphed nude looking for marks or anything else, he also gave 3 vials of blood. Guess what to this day 1 vial of OJ's blood is missing. Hmmm where did it go?
9. Dude is on serious high doses of arthitic medicine. Many old time football players can't even walk and are damn near cripple. And he's one of them.
I don't believe he did it. But I believe he knows who did and was there afterwards. Why? Because of the shoes. There were shoe prints there that matched his shoe size and the soles of those very expensive shoes. And no doubt he had pair of those bad boys. But dude didn't do it I believe. I belive he knows who did, but he himself didn't kill those two people. And just because he slapped her around, I don't believe that led up to him killing her as was the prosecution claim. The same claim that caused him tolose the civil trial. It really was a very interesting trial. They even study it in law school now. I am glad I was able to watch it.
Facebook
Twitter