Do arguments on the internets ever get setttled? Now with pollage.

[EagleKeeper]

Maybe not!

Typical liberal - flip flopping all over the spectrum

 

[sdifox]

Will it take-off definitely got resolved.

 

[IronWing]

Typical liberal - flip flopping all over the spectrum

Your assertion that "Maybe" is anything less than a full and complete assessment of the situation is groundless, grounded in a profound misunderstanding of the meaning of the term.

 

[IronWing]

Will it take-off definitely got resolved.

Only for the most incorrectly imaginable use of the word "definitely".

 

[OCNewbie]

No. How do I know?

1. People disagree.
2:

Q.E.D.

LOL Awesome!

 

[Staples]

Usually one if not both sides are stupid and won't listen to logic/science.

Some common ones are:
Global warming
Cost of PC gaming vs console gaming

 

[IronWing]

Usually one if not both sides are stupid and won't listen to logic/science.

Some common ones are:
Global warming
Cost of PC gaming vs console gaming

I simply can't believe that folks capable of posting on an internet forum could be stupid or unwilling to listen to logic and science. What would be the point of engaging in discussion if you were impervious to reason? So I have to say that you are completely and without the slightest doubt in my mind, wrong. Also, scientific surveys have shown that console gaming is a significant contributor to the non-existence of global warming.

 

[thecrecarc]

I simply can't believe that folks capable of posting on an internet forum could be stupid or unwilling to listen to logic and science. What would be the point of engaging in discussion if you were impervious to reason? So I have to say that you are completely and without the slightest doubt in my mind, wrong. Also, scientific surveys have shown that console gaming is a significant contributor to the non-existence of global warming.

Your entire post is based off of incorrect assumptions. The validity of the premise of which your argument stands vis-a-vis the ones I am hereby proposing seems all but abysmal. If only you would realize the inherent flaw on the points which you have made were made, then the perfection of the flaws that is not in the points I am making will be evident.

 

[Perknose]

Maybe not!

Typical liberal - flip flopping all over the spectrum

Maybe.

 

[IronWing]

Maybe.

Do you find it odd that maybe and maybe not produce identical peaks on the spectral analyzer?

 

[ElFenix]

Your entire post is based off of incorrect assumptions. The validity of the premise of which your argument stands vis-a-vis the ones I am hereby proposing seems all but abysmal. If only you would realize the inherent flaw on the points which you have made were made, then the perfection of the flaws that is not in the points I am making will be evident.

don't you bring your fancy-pants logic into this. there's no place for it now! what we need is quick, decisive action! we need do'ers, not thinkers! strike now, and we'll sort it out later

 

[sdifox]

Only for the most incorrectly imaginable use of the word "definitely".

The ironing of your alias is delicious

 

[Engineer]

Typical liberal - flip flopping all over the spectrum

You're 100% wrong on this one.

 

[IronWing]

don't you bring your fancy-pants logic into this. there's no place for it now! what we need is quick, decisive action! we need do'ers, not thinkers! strike now, and we'll sort it out later

Why are you trying to turn this into yet another religion thread? You'll just bring out the trolls.

 

[moshquerade]

no. usually ppl just give up.

 

[IronWing]

no. usually ppl just give up.

I don't think you're giving folks enough credit for perseverance, no matter how wrong they are.

 

[moshquerade]

I don't think you're giving folks enough credit for perseverance, no matter how wrong they are.

hey.... i see what you did there.

 

[Engineer]

hey.... i see what you did there.

I doubt it! :whiste:

 

[Perknose]

I doubt it! :whiste:

Your corrosive and pervasive doubtedlyness is undermining the tenuous yet wanly hopeful, would-be, imminent, looming, yet-to-be future optimism of our fragile yet younger-than-us youth who are the keystone of the basis of the first principle underlying the foundation of the undergirding of this grand republic of ours.

Are you nevertheless a good person? In your very words, "I doubt it!"

What you are is wrong. Wrong, wrong, wrong . . . so wrong, I dub you Wrong Dong Silver!

World class modesty prevents me from mentioning that, as a shining and sparkly counterpoint, I, on the other hand, am right.

 

[IronWing]

Your corrosive and pervasive doubtedlyness is undermining the tenuous yet wanly hopeful, would-be, imminent, looming, yet-to-be future optimism of our fragile yet younger-than-us youth who are the keystone of the basis of the first principle underlying the foundation of the undergirding of this grand republic of ours.

Are you nevertheless a good person? In your very words, "I doubt it!"

What you are is wrong. Wrong, wrong, wrong . . . so wrong, I dub you Wrong Dong Silver!

World class modesty prevents me from mentioning that, as a shining and sparkly counterpoint, I, on the other hand, am right.

Says the poster who ran away from this thread hours ago only to slink make in to declare victory when he thought his betters had moved on. We're still here and you're still wrong.

 

[Engineer]

Says the poster who ran away from this thread hours ago only to slink make in to declare victory when he thought his betters had moved on. We're still here and you're still wrong.

While I think he's wrong, I think you're wrong for pointing out that he's wrong. That's just wrong....so very wrong.

Perknose, while you're wrong, your "Wrong Dong Silver" made me laugh my ass off though! :biggrin:

 

[Perknose]

We're still here and you're still wrong.

I have made an exhaustingly thorough search of my immediate environs and I can assure you that you are not here. Only I am here. Therefore, I can only conclude that you are wrong.

And . . . your particular parade of wrongness marches on! You make the bald-faced claim that I am still wrong. That claim is wrong, for I have never been wrong in my life, which, and I ask you to follow this exquisitely correct line of logic closely since I won't be taking follow-up questions, which means, ipso facto, q.e.d., b.v.d., e.g., i.e., and n.f.l., I can't possible still be wrong as I have never previously been wrong.

This makes me right.

 

[Engineer]

<<Big words snipped>>

You're still wrong. Do you want to know why? Because I say so and I'm an expert on the subject.

/thread

 

[Perknose]

/thread

With this post, I have conclusively proven your assertion that this thread is over . . . WRONG!

 

[thecrecarc]

I have made an exhaustingly thorough search of my immediate environs and I can assure you that you are not here. Only I am here. Therefore, I can only conclude that you are wrong.

And . . . your particular parade of wrongness marches on! You make the bald-faced claim that I am still wrong. That claim is wrong, for I have never been wrong in my life, which, and I ask you to follow this exquisitely correct line of logic closely since I won't be taking follow-up questions, which means, ipso facto, q.e.d., b.v.d., e.g., i.e., and n.f.l., I can't possible still be wrong as I have never previously been wrong.

This makes me right.

The problem with your post is the assumption of the flaws of the post you are claiming have flaws. The flaws of the post you claim have flaws do not have flaws, but actually errors. Due to the fact the post has no flaws, it cannot have any errors, and therefore, the flaws that are actually errors cannot exist due to the fact it cannot have errors due to the absence of flaws.