• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Divided court rejects school diversity plans

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: babylon5
A white parent, Crystal Meredith, sued, saying her child was twice denied the school nearest their home and had to endure a three-hour bus ride to a facility that was not their top choice. Many African-American parents raised similar concerns." <------

Stupid parents! The gov't knows better what's best for their kids!!! Trust the bureaucrats, darn it!!
 
Hmmm...what is it that you guys are so fond of saying now that you controll congress? Oh yea, the American people voted them in, so let them do the work that the American people want done and stop whinning. Well, the American people voted a Republican president into office when they knew that he would get some Supreme court appointments, so this is what the American people want, so stop whinning about it. :laugh:

BTW, I'd be pretty pissed off too if my kid got bussed around the county just to "diversify" some other school. You do realize that its possible to take forced de-segregation too far right?
 
Originally posted by: RedChief
Makes me wonder how many SCOTUS bashers here actually have kids who have to take busses to school....

raises hand... (not a SCOTUS basher at all)

Our kids would be put in private or Christian schools if we were forced to bus to a school district with lower standards. We chose to live where we are because of the school's quality, one of the best in the State.
 
Originally posted by: BoberFett
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: senseamp
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: Starbuck1975
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote> Typical judicial activism from the right. </end quote></div>
Wow, I could feel your knee jerk from here.

And what about this case wreaks of judicial activism in your mind's eye?</end quote></div>

The 5 conservatives voted to overturn protections by Brown vs Board of education. And exactly how do you enforce racial diversity without looking at race?</end quote></div>

I didn't realize enforcing racial diversity was a function of government. Perhaps you'd like to start mandating a certain percentage of interrracial marriages as well?

So you are still fighting Brown v Board of Education decision?
 
Originally posted by: senseamp
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: BoberFett
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: senseamp
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: Starbuck1975
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote> Typical judicial activism from the right. </end quote></div>
Wow, I could feel your knee jerk from here.

And what about this case wreaks of judicial activism in your mind's eye?</end quote></div>

The 5 conservatives voted to overturn protections by Brown vs Board of education. And exactly how do you enforce racial diversity without looking at race?</end quote></div>

I didn't realize enforcing racial diversity was a function of government. Perhaps you'd like to start mandating a certain percentage of interrracial marriages as well?</end quote></div>

So you are still fighting Brown v Board of Education decision?

I don't know, are you still molesting children?
 
Originally posted by: Craig234
I am sick and tired of the packing of the Supreme Court with these right-wing radicals that are making all these 5-4 decisions to change our society's legal standards. It's effectively a coup of our democracy in many ways.

I want my country back. I'll get the presidency back in 2009, but the court packing has a lot longer legs.

Have you read Robert's remarks?

"Before Brown, schoolchildren were told where they could and could not go to school based on color of their skin. The school districts in these cases have not carried the heavy burden of demonstrating that we should allow this once again -- even for very different reasons," Roberts wrote.

You wish to revert to "pre-Brown" days?

Making decisions based on the color of peoples' skin is OK if your "heart" is in the right place?

Who decides if your motives are pure? Scary thought.

If kids must be bused three hours away to balance the racial makeup of schools, clearly the community itself is heavily segregated.

I would think the school board itself could help with what it sees as a problem by intellegent placement of the schools themselves. Locate them at the "borders" of these segregated communities so that children need not excessively burdened with extensive travel.

I think were the school board's efforts better refined this could be OK. I imagine quite a hardship at the individual level of such excessive bus rides. Where is the time for homework, extra-curricular activities, part-time jobs, quality family time etc? What about the safety of the being on the road for that long?

Do we deprive these bused children of their basics rights to achieve some "community goals"? Is that what the Constitution is about?

I think the SCOTUS made the right decision and the school board's plan lacks any common sense, no matter how well intended.

Many of you act as though Black kids can't learn unless they sit next to White kids. What is the basis to this apparent theory?

Something possibly important, but not addressed in the article - are school resourses ($'s) being fairly distributed? I must assume so as it is not mentioned.

Fern
 
How do you address racial diversity without using race? This is typical conservative thinking, keep black people in the ghetto. No bussing means de-facto segregation. Then you can cut funding to minority inner city schools without worrying that it will impact your family.
 
Originally posted by: Fern

Have you read Robert's remarks?

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>"Before Brown, schoolchildren were told where they could and could not go to school based on color of their skin. The school districts in these cases have not carried the heavy burden of demonstrating that we should allow this once again -- even for very different reasons," Roberts wrote.</end quote></div>

You wish to revert to "pre-Brown" days?

Making decisions based on the color of peoples' skin is OK if your "heart" is in the right place?

Who decides if your motives are pure? Scary thought.

If kids must be bused three hours away to balance the racial makeup of schools, clearly the community itself is heavily segregated.

I would think the school board itself could help with what it sees as a problem by intellegent placement of the schools themselves. Locate them at the "borders" of these segregated communities so that children need not excessively burdened with extensive travel.

I think were the school board's efforts better refined this could be OK. I imagine quite a hardship at the individual level of such excessive bus rides. Where is the time for homework, extra-curricular activities, part-time jobs, quality family time etc? What about the safety of the being on the road for that long?

Do we deprive these bused children of their basics rights to achieve some "community goals"? Is that what the Constitution is about?

I think the SCOTUS made the right decision and the school board's plan lacks any common sense, no matter how well intended.

Many of you act as though Black kids can't learn unless they sit next to White kids. What is the basis to this apparent theory?

Something possibly important, but not addressed in the article - are school resourses ($'s) being fairly distributed? I must assume so as it is not mentioned.

Fern

That quote by Roberts is total crap. Considering the effect of the court's decision in Brown v. Board was to do exactly that, tell kids where they could or could not go to school and enforced it by bussing, for him to invoke that very ruling to support its effective repeal is pretty scummy.

I read some more about this, and this decision (especially Stevens' dissent) this is nothing short of an evisceration of Brown v. Board, and a SCOTUS endorsement of de facto segregation. I guess suddenly it's okay to segregate implicitly, but not explicitly. Total bull$hit.

The basis for the theory that black kids can't learn unless they sit next to white kids is approximately five decades of sociological and educational research showing that not only are majority-minority schools areas in which students vastly underperform compared to majority white schools, but those same students when removed from those bad schools and placed in integrated environments show huge improvement.
 
I think the liberal/conservative divide is more about the equality of outcomes vs. the equality of opportunity as opposed to one side being ideologues.
 
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote> How do you address racial diversity without using race? This is typical conservative thinking, keep black people in the ghetto. No bussing means de-facto segregation. Then you can cut funding to minority inner city schools without worrying that it will impact your family. </end quote></div>
I think the more appropriate solution is to ensure equal distribution of resources across school districts, regardless of racial demographics.

Some community's are segregated simply by the nature of their social dynamics...kids should not have to travel hours on a bus to correct what is a societal problem.

In purchasing a house, one of the factors that play into that decision for many buyers is the quality of the school system...the government stepping in to create "equity" by removing students from the school systems in which they reside is ludicrous.

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote> The basis for the theory that black kids can't learn unless they sit next to white kids is approximately five decades of sociological and educational research showing that not only are majority-minority schools areas in which students vastly underperform compared to majority white schools, but those same students when removed from those bad schools and placed in integrated environments show huge improvement. </end quote></div>
This is an indicator of many social dynamics, one of which is the role models and encouragement that students receive in majority-minority communities...but if anyone targets the social dynamics of those communities as part of the problem, they are racists for doing so.

That quote by Roberts is total crap.
Why is that quote crap...if we remove color of skin from the equation in determining where children can go to school, then the demographics of school districts themselves should become irrelevant...you cannot legislate equity of outcomes.
 
Originally posted by: senseamp
How do you address racial diversity without using race? This is typical conservative thinking, keep black people in the ghetto. No bussing means de-facto segregation. Then you can cut funding to minority inner city schools without worrying that it will impact your family.

Do you actually believe the crap that you spew?

Seriously, your party has done such a great job with minorities in the inner cities....oh wait.
 
What's funny is, those of you screaming about this decision here about this is step backward because of "right wing" Bush government, has no problem with Bush immigration plan of granting citizenship. He wants non-white Spanish speaking folks to come, become Americans. You even worship Bush for that, like he's second coming of Christ saving South Americans from a flood.

But now the same "right wing" Bush Republician appointed judges make this decision, you scream at how racist they are and want to keep pure white America. Oh please, get your logic in order!
 
Originally posted by: JD50
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: senseamp
How do you address racial diversity without using race? This is typical conservative thinking, keep black people in the ghetto. No bussing means de-facto segregation. Then you can cut funding to minority inner city schools without worrying that it will impact your family.
</end quote></div>

Do you actually believe the crap that you spew?

Seriously, your party has done such a great job with minorities in the inner cities....oh wait.

If your party had its way, the only time minorities would leave the inner cities is on their way to prison.
 
Originally posted by: senseamp
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: JD50
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: senseamp
How do you address racial diversity without using race? This is typical conservative thinking, keep black people in the ghetto. No bussing means de-facto segregation. Then you can cut funding to minority inner city schools without worrying that it will impact your family.
</end quote></div>

Do you actually believe the crap that you spew?

Seriously, your party has done such a great job with minorities in the inner cities....oh wait.</end quote></div>

If your party had its way, the only time minorities would leave the inner cities is on their way to prison.

Gee, I must be confused, isn't Robert Byrd a Democrat?

Enough with the race baiting mkay?
 
Originally posted by: senseamp
How do you address racial diversity without using race? This is typical conservative thinking, keep black people in the ghetto. No bussing means de-facto segregation. Then you can cut funding to minority inner city schools without worrying that it will impact your family.
Why do I get the feeling you're a white kid who grew up in the suburbs, got imbued with 'white guilt' up to your gills and is now on a mission to watch out for them po' minorities, who can't possibly take care of themselves?

Sometimes I think I prefer out-and-out racism to the simpering "we'll take care of you, you dumb wittle minority" attitude of people like senseamp.
 
Originally posted by: yllus
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: senseamp
How do you address racial diversity without using race? This is typical conservative thinking, keep black people in the ghetto. No bussing means de-facto segregation. Then you can cut funding to minority inner city schools without worrying that it will impact your family. </end quote></div>
Why do I get the feeling you're a white kid who grew up in the suburbs, got imbued with 'white guilt' up to your gills and is now on a mission to watch out for them po' minorities, who can't possibly take care of themselves?

Sometimes I think I prefer out-and-out racism to the simpering "we'll take care of you, you dumb wittle minority" attitude of people like senseamp.

I think you hit that nail on the head.

 
Originally posted by: JD50
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: yllus
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: senseamp
How do you address racial diversity without using race? This is typical conservative thinking, keep black people in the ghetto. No bussing means de-facto segregation. Then you can cut funding to minority inner city schools without worrying that it will impact your family. </end quote></div>
Why do I get the feeling you're a white kid who grew up in the suburbs, got imbued with 'white guilt' up to your gills and is now on a mission to watch out for them po' minorities, who can't possibly take care of themselves?

Sometimes I think I prefer out-and-out racism to the simpering "we'll take care of you, you dumb wittle minority" attitude of people like senseamp.</end quote></div>

I think you hit that nail on the head.

WRONG. I went to an inner city school, which was close to 100% minority. From there I went to get two engineering degrees from two of the top 10 universities in the country. So all these whiners complaining their kids have to take a bus to an inner city school, suck it up.

 
Originally posted by: senseamp
WRONG. I went to an inner city school, which was close to 100% minority. From there I went to get two engineering degrees from two of the top 10 universities in the country. So all these whiners complaining their kids have to take a bus to an inner city school, suck it up.

So you're white? I wonder how many times you would've gotten your ass kicked if you didn't display white guilt. 😀

In any case, I'd like you to justify the ill effects of affirmative action on Asians such as myself.
 
Sounds like you got a good education from an inner city school.

Did most your classmates do as good as you do went to college? Did you experience racism there?
 
Originally posted by: dmens
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: senseamp
WRONG. I went to an inner city school, which was close to 100% minority. From there I went to get two engineering degrees from two of the top 10 universities in the country. So all these whiners complaining their kids have to take a bus to an inner city school, suck it up.
</end quote></div>

So you're white? I wonder how many times you would've gotten your ass kicked if you didn't display white guilt. 😀

In any case, I'd like you to justify the ill effects of affirmative action on Asians such as myself.

Whatever doesn't kill you makes you stronger. Buck up.
 
Originally posted by: dmens
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: senseamp
Whatever doesn't kill you makes you stronger. Buck up.
</end quote></div>

Compassionate leftism in action. :beer:

This thread is not about AA anyways, it's about desegregation.
Secondly, I am not seeing these supposed ill effects on Asians. Vast majority of the people I work with are Asian.
 
Originally posted by: senseamp
This thread is not about AA anyways, it's about desegregation.
Secondly, I am not seeing these supposed ill effects on Asians. Vast majority of the people I work with are Asian.

No, this thread is about the use of race as a factor in educational policy. Affirmative action is just that.

Your argument is completely retarded. You don't see ill effects simply because you don't look. Consider the 200-400 SAT score penalty on asian applicants to top tier colleges. That is undeniable. Notice the leap in asian members in the UC schools after the abolition of racial quotas, and the high number of Asians in race-blind institutions such as Stuyvesant HS. The policies you support deny many asians the chance at a higher quality education.

The fact that you work with a lot of asians is not only irrelevant, it is also a stupid argument. personal anecdotes are meaningless in this context.
 
Back
Top