Originally posted by: Silverthorne
Overtaking AMD Users : 74.67 Days | Gap : 9,139,527 :thumbsup:
Originally posted by: petrusbroder
Well, probably, but not absolutely necessarily:
Rank __Team_______________Measurements
6.____AMD Users__________26 652 369 (added last week: 527 708)
7.____TeAm AnandTech_____17 403 315 (added last week: 1 467 175, we gained on AMD Users: 939 467)
8.____Crunchers Inc._______14 558 930 (added last week: 2 572 136, Crunchers Inc gained on TeAm: 1 104 961!)
We need to increase our production but considering the number of new crunchers added last week: that is not impossible! We need to recruit though.
Originally posted by: mondobyte
Originally posted by: petrusbroder
Well, probably, but not absolutely necessarily:
Rank __Team_______________Measurements
6.____AMD Users__________26 652 369 (added last week: 527 708)
7.____TeAm AnandTech_____17 403 315 (added last week: 1 467 175, we gained on AMD Users: 939 467)
8.____Crunchers Inc._______14 558 930 (added last week: 2 572 136, Crunchers Inc gained on TeAm: 1 104 961!)
We need to increase our production but considering the number of new crunchers added last week: that is not impossible! We need to recruit though.
Could I construe this to mean that any contributions by myself towards the TeAM are "unwelcome" ???
Originally posted by: mondobyte
Originally posted by: petrusbroder
Well, probably, but not absolutely necessarily:
Rank __Team_______________Measurements
6.____AMD Users__________26 652 369 (added last week: 527 708)
7.____TeAm AnandTech_____17 403 315 (added last week: 1 467 175, we gained on AMD Users: 939 467)
8.____Crunchers Inc._______14 558 930 (added last week: 2 572 136, Crunchers Inc gained on TeAm: 1 104 961!)
We need to increase our production but considering the number of new crunchers added last week: that is not impossible! We need to recruit though.
Could I construe this to mean that any contributions by myself towards the TeAM are "unwelcome" ???
Originally posted by: Mk4
We are starting to close quickly. Production has gone way up.Overtaking AMD Users : 74.67 Days | Gap : 9,139,527 :thumbsup:
Sure, but we'll be overtaken by the Crunchers Inc. way before that.
We need more...More...MORE! :Q
Originally posted by: petrusbroder
Well, probably, but not absolutely necessarily:
Rank __Team_______________Measurements
6.____AMD Users__________26 652 369 (added last week: 527 708)
7.____TeAm AnandTech_____17 403 315 (added last week: 1 467 175, we gained on AMD Users: 939 467)
8.____Crunchers Inc._______14 558 930 (added last week: 2 572 136, Crunchers Inc gained on TeAm: 1 104 961!)
We need to increase our production but considering the number of new crunchers added last week: that is not impossible! We need to recruit though.
Originally posted by: petrusbroder
Originally posted by: Mk4
We are starting to close quickly. Production has gone way up.Overtaking AMD Users : 74.67 Days | Gap : 9,139,527 :thumbsup:
Sure, but we'll be overtaken by the Crunchers Inc. way before that.
We need more...More...MORE! :Q
Originally posted by: petrusbroder
Well, probably, but not absolutely necessarily:
Rank __Team_______________Measurements
6.____AMD Users__________26 652 369 (added last week: 527 708)
7.____TeAm AnandTech_____17 403 315 (added last week: 1 467 175, we gained on AMD Users: 939 467)
8.____Crunchers Inc._______14 558 930 (added last week: 2 572 136, Crunchers Inc gained on TeAm: 1 104 961!)
We need to increase our production but considering the number of new crunchers added last week: that is not impossible! We need to recruit though.
I am sorryfor the misunderstanding.
My sentence "Well, probably, but not absolutely necessarily:" refers to the sentence "Sure, but we'll be overtaken by the Crunchers Inc. way before that" and not "We need more...More...MORE!".
Of course "We need more...More...MORE!"
There was no slur intended on those who crunch for TA in Dimes. I did not want to imply that any cruncher's contribution is not welcome.
I will read my posts better before posting.
I would also like to thank all of you who have understood what I wanted to say in spite of my bad grammar. English is my third language ...
Originally posted by: Zbox
xie xie
a new user question:
is there any possible way to have a single agent do more production? I have plenty of available bandwidth, and this would be much more efficient than deploying multiple agents on to individual machines to increase production.
Originally posted by: mondobyte
Hi
In any case ... seems I have a few computers to throw into this cause ...
Don't really feel strongly about it one way or another and I hate that it won't run from a server ... but what the heck ... I've got it running on a few "odd" computers ...
mondo
