• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Deutsche Bank confirms it has Trump's tax returns...and will release them

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
VRAMdemon said:
We already do have a committee, which includes a wide variety of people across the country, who vets presidential candidates in great detail and determines whether they're fit to hold office. And in 2016, 62,984,828 members of that committee decided that he was fit
Click to expand...
So . . . he came in second . . . in a two person race? 🙄
 
Last edited:
Who's returns do they have?

The subpoena asked for the Presidents, Trump Jr. , Erik's, Ivanka's and a whole shitload of their businesses.

I'll remind the TDS suffering fucktards that 2 + 2 != 92.

Rub away!
 
IJTSSG said:
Who's returns do they have?

The subpoena asked for the Presidents, Trump Jr. , Erik's, Ivanka's and a whole shitload of their businesses.

I'll remind the TDS suffering fucktards that 2 + 2 != 92.

Rub away!
Click to expand...

Just as a purely theoretical question, so let’s assume stuff but acknowledge this is just a mind exercise and not fact.
Let’s pretend Trump industries or whatever privately owned Trump business had a large loan underwritten (co-signed) by a Russian business with close ties to Putin.
Are you okay with that or does it effect your vote in anyway?

Keep in mind I’m not trying to say it’s impeachment or illegal just your opinion on the above.
*large loan is large not some silly process thing like a couple of thousand dollars*
 
glenn1 said:
Reread my posts. I'm not bitching and I'm fine that his returns are being made public (he should have done it himself long ago). My point is that IMHO there will be nothing in the release that either kills outright or mortally wounds his presidency or reelection chances. Any impact would be swamped within the ocean of other disclosures about him and his own gaffes and incompetence anyway.
Click to expand...

the dude won by ~70k votes spread across 3 states. 70k votes. That is statistically below margin of error territory (even though that isn't possible, but let's just have fun with it).

Say this information does come to light, or was available then, do you think it could have made a difference in at least 70k strategic votes out of the 62.5 million that voted for this criminal?

I think so.

again...70k votes. Deniers like to claim that no amount of the known Russian interference could have been significant enough to sway the vote with so many cast. .....70k people is less than the population of the vast majority of counties across the country--of nearly all cities. That's such a tiny amount of votes that became undemocratically significant, that yes: all of these things matter in the end.

Trump has already lost a shit-ton of support from people that voted for him in 2016. It seems that his only strategy now is to speak directly to his unwavering base, and them only. ...obviously that's a terrible idea, because he is going to need way more than that, but every little piece of information effects those voters that are obviously swayable.

Remember that the disinformation campaign was so thoroughly widespread that year, here on these forums and at rallies we had actual so-called humans repeating proven Russian propaganda (Hillary is deathly Ill! Hillary is weak on Russia! Hillary ....blah whatever!) as their reason for voting for Trump. "I hate Trump, but this [lie about Hillary!]"

People routinely admitted that their vote was influenced by proven Russian propaganda from fake Russian accounts, like the shit OrroRoRoroROROOs constantly posts on here, with zero shame. And they still do. Handwave away proven, facebook FWD FWD FWD Russian propaganda that seems to have informed enough stooges that Trump was their guy, as not being an influence on their votes, but it is literally what happened. And we absolutely know that it took less than a figurative handful of votes to make it significant.
 
Last edited:
IJTSSG said:
Who's returns do they have?

The subpoena asked for the Presidents, Trump Jr. , Erik's, Ivanka's and a whole shitload of their businesses.

I'll remind the TDS suffering fucktards that 2 + 2 != 92.

Rub away!
Click to expand...
What the fuck was that salad about?
 
IJTSSG said:
Who's returns do they have?

The subpoena asked for the Presidents, Trump Jr. , Erik's, Ivanka's and a whole shitload of their businesses.

I'll remind the TDS suffering fucktards that 2 + 2 != 92.

Rub away!
Click to expand...

You're only supposed to butt chug the booze, not the Adderall.
 
SlowSpyder said:
There you go again, injecting race into everything.

Nikola Tesla once said, “If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration.”

It can also be said, if you want to find the secrets of liberals, think in terms or race, victimization, and making excuses.
Click to expand...
You are assuming that you can actually think rather than just rationalize, which is what you are doing here. What people are telling you in this forum is that you have a bad case of being unable to think rationally. You can't follow a line of reason directly to conclusion if the conclusion creates any ego deflation. You are not honest with yourself. Really, the only person who suffers will be yourself and any group that lives in the same bubble, sound and fury signifying nothing, as it were.
 
Interesting commentary here. Is it really TDS to expect Trump to provide that the same financial disclosure that you would expect from any other public official? Obviously not.
But it is definitely a kind of reverse TDS to insist that Trump should not have to make the same financial disclosure that you would expect from other public officials.
But then again, I'm pretty sure some posters here would happily suck Trump off and swallow after he raped their mothers, so there is that.
 
Vic said:
Interesting commentary here. Is it really TDS to expect Trump to provide that the same financial disclosure that you would expect from any other public official? Obviously not.
But it is definitely a kind of reverse TDS to insist that Trump should not have to make the same financial disclosure that you would expect from other public officials.
But then again, I'm pretty sure some posters here would happily suck Trump off and swallow after he raped their mothers, so there is that.
Click to expand...


Well, trump is the chosen one after all.
 
MomentsofSanity said:
It will be a cold day in HELL before I ever make that change!!!

Click to expand...

Apologies to you because I was just informed by a knowledgeable Repub friend of mine that the term "eleventeen" is viewed very impressively by many conservatives as to mean the number of very young teenagers Jeff Epstein banged in one night.
 
Lawrence O'Donnell of MSNBC has apologized.

"Last night I made an error in judgment by reporting an item about the president's finances that didn't go through our rigorous verification and standards process. I shouldn't have reported it and I was wrong to discuss it on the air. I will address the issue on my show tonight."

Don't stop believing! lol 😛
 
I expect O'Donnell to be cancelled shortly. His show is mostly about him trying to aggravate trump and it hasn't offered anything of value in a long while. I was a fan when he would use his knowledge of how Congress worked as to how and why Congress was doing what it does and explaining the "sausage making" but he rarely offers that now.
 
compuwiz1 said:
Lawrence O'Donnell of MSNBC has apologized.

"Last night I made an error in judgment by reporting an item about the president's finances that didn't go through our rigorous verification and standards process. I shouldn't have reported it and I was wrong to discuss it on the air. I will address the issue on my show tonight."

Don't stop believing! lol 😛
Click to expand...


Now if only every GOP talking point host on FOX would follow his example of contrition what a better world world this would be. 😉
 
I’ll be honest I haven’t followed this story. Wasn’t the original posted by Washington Post?
Why is it relevant that Lawrence ODonell messed up?
Also he apologized and appears he will address it tonight. He admitted a mistake and appears to be fighting that mistake.
 
compuwiz1 said:
Lawrence O'Donnell of MSNBC has apologized.

"Last night I made an error in judgment by reporting an item about the president's finances that didn't go through our rigorous verification and standards process. I shouldn't have reported it and I was wrong to discuss it on the air. I will address the issue on my show tonight."

Don't stop believing! lol 😛
Click to expand...

So this means you think trump isnt a crook? Or you would think that no matter what?
 
Fanatical Meat said:
I’ll be honest I haven’t followed this story. Wasn’t the original posted by Washington Post?
Why is it relevant that Lawrence ODonell messed up?
Also he apologized and appears he will address it tonight. He admitted a mistake and appears to be fighting that mistake.
Click to expand...
I was looking for corraborating stories earlier and the WP article appeared to have been posted after his tweet (maybe I was looking at wrong one), but was also a broader article and more vague about this specific topic. What was clear is it set of an immediate media circle jerk reporting on the same thing with no clear indication of an actually vetted source. Getting sick of this shit.
 
Fanatical Meat said:
I’ll be honest I haven’t followed this story. Wasn’t the original posted by Washington Post?
Why is it relevant that Lawrence ODonell messed up?
Also he apologized and appears he will address it tonight. He admitted a mistake and appears to be fighting that mistake.
Click to expand...

The WP broke the story that DB has trumps tax information and plans to hand it over. O'Donnell reported on his show last night that a single source told him that one of trumps loans was cosigned by a Russian oligarch. He specifically said it was from a single source and hadn't been verified yet.
 
JSt0rm said:
So this means you think trump isnt a crook? Or you would think that no matter what?
Click to expand...
It means that he doesn't care if Trump is a crook or not. As long as he never has to face the possibility of admitting he was wrong to anonymous strangers on the internet.
 
The fact that DB has tax returns for Trump or his close family or businesses is undisputable. It also has some information concerning loans that the court has asked for. The Russian cosign thing appears to not have been vetted.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top