- Jan 1, 2005
- 8,119
- 5,143
- 146
So earlier in the year I cracked a root-canal'd tooth while eating, and ended up getting it pulled three months ago. It's a first upper molar. My treatment plan suggested an implant and possible sinus lift, so I was all ready for that.
I had a follow-up appointment last week and everything is healing nicely. After reviewing the latest 3-D scan, the periodontist said the sinus lift would be necessary and fairly complicated. My sinus cavity dips down quite a bit just around that one tooth (lucky, huh?), so roughly half of the implant would extend into my sinus cavity. He said we can make it work, but it's going to be pretty invasive and not an absolute guarantee that it would work out.
He recommended a bridge rather than an implant, especially since I do have good hygiene and wouldn't slip on keeping it clean. I'm still thinking through it, and I plan on getting a second opinion, but I was wondering if anyone here went through the same thing.
My major concern with the bridge is modifying two healthy teeth just to accommodate one bad tooth. If something happened to one or both of the now-crowned teeth (like cracking it while eating...), I'd basically be out of options. I feel like if I went the bridge route, even if it works out well, I'd always have that nagging thought of whether the implant would have been a better choice, especially since I'm relatively young at 38.
There is also the chance that the implant could fail, but in that case I'd really only be out the money and time/pain of all the procedures associated with it - I could always fall back on the bridge in a worst-case scenario. Regardless of what I choose, I want the most permanent option. I'd rather deal with implant-associated procedures now, than get a bridge now and risk having to get more implants or modify more healthy teeth when/before I'm in my 60s.
Any advice?
I had a follow-up appointment last week and everything is healing nicely. After reviewing the latest 3-D scan, the periodontist said the sinus lift would be necessary and fairly complicated. My sinus cavity dips down quite a bit just around that one tooth (lucky, huh?), so roughly half of the implant would extend into my sinus cavity. He said we can make it work, but it's going to be pretty invasive and not an absolute guarantee that it would work out.
He recommended a bridge rather than an implant, especially since I do have good hygiene and wouldn't slip on keeping it clean. I'm still thinking through it, and I plan on getting a second opinion, but I was wondering if anyone here went through the same thing.
My major concern with the bridge is modifying two healthy teeth just to accommodate one bad tooth. If something happened to one or both of the now-crowned teeth (like cracking it while eating...), I'd basically be out of options. I feel like if I went the bridge route, even if it works out well, I'd always have that nagging thought of whether the implant would have been a better choice, especially since I'm relatively young at 38.
There is also the chance that the implant could fail, but in that case I'd really only be out the money and time/pain of all the procedures associated with it - I could always fall back on the bridge in a worst-case scenario. Regardless of what I choose, I want the most permanent option. I'd rather deal with implant-associated procedures now, than get a bridge now and risk having to get more implants or modify more healthy teeth when/before I'm in my 60s.
Any advice?