Here is a good comment:
Because Denny's isn't raising the prices by 5% - the legislation is. It's no different than any other form of tax and taxes are generally not included in the menu price.
In this article:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...cut-employee-hours-deal-cost-legislation.html
But to pay $5,000 per employee would cost us $175,000 per restaurant and unfortunately, most of our restaurants don't make $175,000 a year. I can't afford it.
I don't know if his numbers are accurate, but based on what he's saying who here can blame him? These restaurants are hardly printing presses. BTW $5k/year is crap insurance, so he's probably talking bottom-of-the-barrel stuff, and yet where is this money going to come from? It has to either come from the customer or from his employees in the form of less pay OR what he claims he'll do: cut their hours back.
Apparently some people here think a business can easily find a few grand per employee? Sorry, these employees are not worth much: their pay sucks, economically on a societal level they are not actually contributing enough to the economy to buy modern health care. And that's why they don't have it. And it's why the only way they'll get it is with universal care where the cost is put off to gov, but putting it off to private businesses forces them to do what they can to avoid it.
I don't know if this Denny's guy's numbers are accurate, but only a truly naive fool thinks any business is going to take on a new cost without exploring options to minimize. Much of the restaurant business operates on razor thin margins and paying $2k (the penalty) per low-end worker is a massive burden. That penalty alone increases the worker's cost by 10% if he's making only $10/hour.
So, I assume he is rolling out this surcharge the all the other restaurants he owns. I bet his health care is wonderful..and probably the same for the top level employees under him.
Of course it is, he is the boss. You think the boss should have no more perks than the lowliest employee on the food chain? That's not how it works.
I agree it's probably better for him to just insure his employees and jack the prices up by 5%, though.