• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Denmark Fines First Woman Under New Burka Ban

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
You should be allowed to walk down the street naked for no other reason than that's what you want to do.
Don't get too far ahead of these people. You want people to be free to wear whatever, or not, and he thinks freedom requires being able to use government to tell other people what they can or cannot wear.. or else.
 
Don't get too far ahead of these people. You want people to be free to wear whatever, or not, and he thinks freedom requires being able to use government to tell other people what they can or cannot wear.. or else.

Yeah, but it's not our government and I'm sure they have their own unique problems there, as well as their own reasons for the ban. Can we at least agree on that point?

And my naked, straw man post, was in jest and I knew some you would react to it. lol
 
"Attire has nothing to do with religious rights. "

This right there says Compuwiz has never read the Bible.
 
Yeah, but it's not our government and I'm sure they have their own unique problems there, as well as their own reasons for the ban. Can we at least agree on that point?
No, because Denmark is an illiberal government. They still have a monarchy (albeit constitutional) and they still require their citizens to pay tax to the state religion (the literal definition of illiberal).
More to the point, this isn't about being "cucked." It's about a state that can't maintain a reproduction rate sufficient to support its economy. It thus requires immigrated labor to sustain itself, but then freaks out when those immigrants have their own customs. As if they were slaves.
 
No, because Denmark is an illiberal government. They still have a monarchy (albeit constitutional) and they still require their citizens to pay tax to the state religion (the literal definition of illiberal).
More to the point, this isn't about being "cucked." It's about a state that can't maintain a reproduction rate sufficient to support its economy. It thus requires immigrated labor to sustain itself, but then freaks out when those immigrants have their own customs. As if they were slaves.

And I don't give a shit what they do there. Why do you? The more I think about it, it's none of our business. OMG, we need more sperms there, like that is supposed to be our problem. Why don't you go there and donate a few gallons, jack off?

I'll do the same, but I prefer Asia. 🙂
 
Or just telling its citizens what they can or cannot wear. When do they make Mormon garments and Jewish tassles illegal too? And if not, why not?
Jews and Mormons aren't religions where their hero is a violent pedophile who married children under 10 and advocated the pillage and murder of people he didn't like. If shariah law was acceptable under any form of western government it would be what governs us. It never will, and banning people who advocate shariah is the first step.
 
Jews and Mormons aren't religions where their hero is a violent pedophile who married children under 10 and advocated the pillage and murder of people he didn't like. If shariah law was acceptable under any form of western government it would be what governs us. It never will, and banning people who advocate shariah is the first step.
Another one who's never read the Bible.
 
I've never heard of this new western Leviticus country that practices Shariah Law. Can you give us the lat long coords?

BTW why should denmark implement Shariah Law? Convince me.

I was pointing out that Islam is not unique in its history of pedophilia and draconian religious law. Those same things are also in the Bible. That no country currently practices Mosaic Law is irrelevant to that fact. I'm also going to point out that millions of Americans want Mosaic Law to be the law of the land in the US. We see that every time they demand that the 10 Commandments be posted on courthouses and other government buildings.

Your 2nd paragraph is pure dishonest straw man on your part. I don't believe that Denmark or any other country should practice Sharia or any other form of religious law. In fact, I believe very strongly that no country should ever practice any form of religious law, and anyone who knows my posting history here already knows that.

Why don't you try to convince me why liberals, who tirelessly advocate for secular governments and the separation of church and state, would ever go against those core beliefs and want Denmark, or any country, to practice Sharia law?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top