Dems sneak in extension of Patriot Act into Jobs Bill

dammitgibs

Senior member
Jan 31, 2009
477
0
0
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0210/32744.html

A draft of the roughly $80 billion bill, obtained by POLITICO, has a wide range of tax credits and job creation ideas, but it also includes provisions unrelated to jobs, including a reauthorization of the Patriot Act

I can't quite tell is this the transparency? or the hope? or the change? I never expected the patriot act to go away when the democrats got into power, but I really didn't think they would take such a backdoor approach to it.
 

woolfe9999

Diamond Member
Mar 28, 2005
7,153
0
0
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0210/32744.html



I can't quite tell is this the transparency? or the hope? or the change? I never expected the patriot act to go away when the democrats got into power, but I really didn't think they would take such a backdoor approach to it.

You think this isn't being done in conjunction with republicans, that its inclusion wasn't requested by republicans? I'm not going to put all the blame on repubs for this, but casting the inclusion of this in the bill as solely a dem idea is probably not accurate.

- wolf
 

cubeless

Diamond Member
Sep 17, 2001
4,295
1
81
but the repubs just say no to everything.... this must be the new solidarity of the dems...
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,705
6,261
126
"Dems"? Really?

Article gives no indication who has included it. Closest to identifying it is this quote ""We also, prior to the end of this month, have to do some things that are extremely important to the country," he said. "We have to extend the Patriot Act."

Unfortunately, it is unclear who said that. Last person noted was a "Republican Aide", but that was a couple paragraphs earlier.

I think you have jumped the gun on whom is doing what.
 

woolfe9999

Diamond Member
Mar 28, 2005
7,153
0
0
"Dems"? Really?

Article gives no indication who has included it. Closest to identifying it is this quote ""We also, prior to the end of this month, have to do some things that are extremely important to the country," he said. "We have to extend the Patriot Act."

Unfortunately, it is unclear who said that. Last person noted was a "Republican Aide", but that was a couple paragraphs earlier.

I think you have jumped the gun on whom is doing what.

Yes I had trouble tracking that pronoun as well. It may refer to a republican aid, or might refer to Reid. Reid did vote for the original act and its 2006 renewal. However, the context here is that dems and repubs are hashing out a bi-partisan jobs bill. Any inclusion of this extension was done, at a minimum, with repub approval, and may well have been done at their request, or in order to induce as many of them as possible to vote for the bill. This is almost certainly a shared responsibility of both parties.

The original bill and its extension unfortunately had wide bi-partisan support, though props to 62 House dems and 3 House reps plus Russ Feingold for voting no.

http://educate-yourself.org/cn/patriotact20012006senatevote.shtml

- wolf
 

dammitgibs

Senior member
Jan 31, 2009
477
0
0
Ok ok I agree that republicans are certainly not free from blame, but this is Reid's puppy, with a democrat controlled congress, and Obama will sign it. If the republicans were in power I don't really doubt that they would do something similar. Government is just broken period dot. But when the "party of no" doesn't support this bill then they will be labeled as "look republicans don't support jobs!" just as if they made a Sunshine and Lollipops bill and burred a bunch of BS pork in it, and the republicans opposed it they would say "look, republicans hate sunshine and lollipops!"
 
Last edited:

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,705
6,261
126
Ok ok I agree that republicans are certainly not free from blame, but this is Reid's puppy, with a democrat controlled congress, and Obama will sign it. If the republicans were in power I don't really doubt that they would do something similar. Government is just broken period dot. But when the "party of no" doesn't support this bill then they will be labeled as "look republicans don't support jobs!" just as if they made a Sunshine and Lollipops bill and burred a bunch of BS pork in it, and the republicans opposed it they would say "look, republicans hate sunshine and lollipops!"

wut?
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,592
6,715
126
The short answer is that Republicans piss themselves at the mention of national security and when one Republican smells the piss of another he pisses himself too. And the smell of the piss goes right to the verbal centers and comes out as Wuss Wuss Wuss.
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
A Democrat controlled house, senate and executive, and still the hacks are trying to blame everything on Republicans. You people are the absolute scum of politics.
 

Patranus

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2007
9,280
0
0
Two totally unrelated pieces of legislation that should be voted on separately.

This is one of the major things that is wrong with Washington.
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
wut? Did you read the thread title?? :\

You just can't do anything right, can you?

You think this isn't being done in conjunction with republicans, that its inclusion wasn't requested by republicans? I'm not going to put all the blame on repubs for this, but casting the inclusion of this in the bill as solely a dem idea is probably not accurate.

- wolf

Sounds like he's blaming the Republicans.
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
george-bush-miss-me-yet.jpg


;)