Originally posted by: yllus
I see one broken promise and two responses to public opinion; rather glad to see a government in place that doesn't get bullheaded and refuse to listen to what we the people want.
This in comparison with a government that stifled an inquiry into the deaths of dozens of Canadians by terrorists in order to curry their vote, allowed another terrorist group to fundraise in the nation to get their votes as well, bilked us taxpayers out of $100 million to reward old friends in Quebec, sent us to war in Afghanistan without any public debate, and has now recommitted us to the Kyoto Protocol after complete inaction on its goals for the past 12 years.
You call that the same old?
Income trusts weren't a response to public opinion, they were a promise that anyone with half a brain could see wouldn't be kept, but which was made to solidify support among the core support group for the CP - upper-middle and higher income people over the age of 50.
The environmental flip-flop would have been easier to swallow if Harper was able to pronounce the words 'we were wrong', or, failing that 'we are changing our position to better reflect what Canadians want'. The fact that a lot of the funding has been announced several times as 'new' (certainly something the CP did
not invent) and much of it is essentially restoring scrapped Liberal plans doesn't help.
You asked for three, but we can immediately add pinching an elected member of the opposition, and if I recall, giving him a cabinet position, before parliament even sat after the election. This after the incredible screaming and outrage over Belinda Stronach, who at least left over an actual issue. It doesn't make things look better that the CP never had a hope of winning that riding.
We could also have a look at the complete inaction on our unelected senate, which was made to look like a priority, and for me was one of the few positives in the Conservative platform.
Most recently, the Khan debacle should make anyone wonder how many backroom deals Harper is really making.
Edit - adscam is/was what it was, but I think was handled adequately when it came to light. While I don't want to encourage apathy in such things, $100 million is not that much money, and it was a much better election issue than it was an actual issue.
The war in Afghanistan was widely supported. I don't have an issue with us having gone there, but I certainly give Chretien credit for keeping us out of Iraq, despite immense pressure from south of the border.