Is it a good idea for the party of diversity to be filibustering a hispanic candidate judge.
Originally posted by: charrison
Linkage
Is it a good idea for the party of diversity to be filibustering a hispanic candidate judge.
Originally posted by: BDawg
Originally posted by: charrison
Linkage
Is it a good idea for the party of diversity to be filibustering a hispanic candidate judge.
I believe they're treating him by his views, not the color of his skin. The Republicans should be happy.
Originally posted by: BDawg
Originally posted by: charrison
Linkage
Is it a good idea for the party of diversity to be filibustering a hispanic candidate judge.
I believe they're treating him by his views, not the color of his skin. The Republicans should be happy.
It depends on how his views would effect them. Funny that Republicans would make the race ticket an issue.Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: BDawg
Originally posted by: charrison
Linkage
Is it a good idea for the party of diversity to be filibustering a hispanic candidate judge.
I believe they're treating him by his views, not the color of his skin. The Republicans should be happy.
I have no doubt, but I doubt it will be good for their minority base.
Wrong, plenty of Hispanics are actually mobilizing against this Estrada guy. Not just for views, but because he has very light experience to be apointed as a judge in the most important district appeals court.Originally posted by: charrison
I have no doubt, but I doubt it will be good for their minority base.
Originally posted by: outriding
Good .... i always hated CHiPs
Originally posted by: AvesPKS
Originally posted by: outriding
Good .... i always hated CHiPs
Hehe...I was about to ask if it was Eric.
I believe they're treating him by his views, not the color of his skin. The Republicans should be happy.
Originally posted by: glenn1
Is it a good idea for the party of diversity to be filibustering a hispanic candidate judge.
They didn't seem too shy about putting Thomas Clarence through the wringer, and he's african-american, so i don't see why they'd treat a hispanic any different.
Not just for views, but because he has very light experience to be apointed as a judge in the most important district appeals court
By the sugesstions in this thread that race is playing an issue I can only conclude you think your smart, right. Probably good looking too and can bench 400 lbs. You go with your dilusional selves boyz.
Yeah but what will the Dems do when Bush nominates a black republican woman to the USSC, after Reinqhuest retires. Huh, what are they going to do. Deny the first black woman a spot on the USSC because shes a republican?
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
Yeah but what will the Dems do when Bush nominates a black republican woman to the USSC, after Reinqhuest retires. Huh, what are they going to do. Deny the first black woman a spot on the USSC because shes a republican?
Are you nominating Connie Rice . . . Condolezza's cousin? She's a liberal civil rights attorney . . . I don't see it happening.
Originally posted by: Mookow
Originally posted by: AvesPKS
Originally posted by: outriding
Good .... i always hated CHiPs
Hehe...I was about to ask if it was Eric.
this guy?
OR
one of these guys, I'm sure
Originally posted by: jaeger66
Besides, a liberal court is better for the nation anyway. No bible-based decisions.