• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Democratic Party - Clueless & Feckless - is the D party done?

Page 15 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Biggest problem was not figuring out backlash to migrants..

Biden thought we have a ton of YIMBY's.. but we have more NIMBY's than YIMBY's.

Stuff like this definitely did not help where ever the migrants were shipped too from Texas..

1734971510455.png
 
Indus said:
Biggest problem was not figuring out backlash to migrants..

Biden thought we have a ton of YIMBY's.. but we have more NIMBY's than YIMBY's.

Stuff like this definitely did not help where ever the migrants were shipped too from Texas..

View attachment 113668
Click to expand...
YIMBYism is about building housing and infrastructure. It has nothing to do with immigration.

NIMBYism is also almost exclusively a state law issue, it has almost nothing to do with the feds. That’s why there isn’t a federal push to strip NIMBYs of their power to block construction, it’s a state thing.
 
Fenixgoon said:
Sub optimal is an understatement. That's dumb as shit
Click to expand...

didn't block it , they ran out of time

If the executive session had gone through, it wasn’t clear that the nominations would have made it through the Senate anyway due to possible opposition from Sens. Joe Manchin (I-W.Va.) and Kyrsten Sinema (I-Ariz.), along with Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), who is viewed as an ally of Big Tech.


Manchin and Sinema voted against a procedural move last week that would have cleared the way for a Democratic majority on the National Labor Relations Board, a last-minute effort by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.).
Click to expand...
 
dlerious said:
No terrorism charge for him though. Just 1st and 2nd degree murder and 1st degree arson. Guess she wasn't a wealthy CEO.
Click to expand...
How would this case be even remotely plausibly a terrorism case? That makes no sense to me. What was the political objective?

I think the terrorism charges for that CEO are excessive too but there’s at least some veneer there.
 
fskimospy said:
How would this case be even remotely plausibly a terrorism case? That makes no sense to me. What was the political objective?

I think the terrorism charges for that CEO are excessive too but there’s at least some veneer there.
Click to expand...

At least in terms of the English language, if not necessarily legal consequences (I'd leave that to the lawyers), "Terrorism" seems absolutely the correct term for that CEO shooting.

Though it should also have been the term used for, for example, all the historic lynchings, and most LGBT hate-crimes. A great deal of violent crime is largely about inspiring terror in a particular demographic group, and has implicitly political aims.

Also the line between terrorism and mental-health problems frequently seems a very fuzzy one to me.
 
Indus said:
Biggest problem was not figuring out backlash to migrants..

Biden thought we have a ton of YIMBY's.. but we have more NIMBY's than YIMBY's.

Stuff like this definitely did not help where ever the migrants were shipped too from Texas..

View attachment 113668
Click to expand...

Dang, maybe Trump was right, other countries are emptying their asylums and sending them here.

How else do you explain someone lighting a person on fire and just watching them burn.
 
fskimospy said:
How would this case be even remotely plausibly a terrorism case? That makes no sense to me. What was the political objective?

I think the terrorism charges for that CEO are excessive too but there’s at least some veneer there.
Click to expand...
Using those veneers against us is the real terrorism.
 
cytg111 said:
Question: Now that you know that Kamala loses, if you could, would you rewind time and cancel the Kamala campaign and let Biden have a shot at it?
Click to expand...
I mean that's really a stupid question dude. Of course it it's better to try anything than losing.

But Biden is a fucking asshole because he's still ignorant that him deciding to run again is what really fucked the Democrats. His legacy is completely tarnished because of that, that's what he should be regretting.
 
MrSquished said:
I mean that's really a stupid question dude. Of course it it's better to try anything than losing.

But Biden is a fucking asshole because he's still ignorant that him deciding to run again is what really fucked the Democrats. His legacy is completely tarnished because of that, that's what he should be regretting.
Click to expand...
Or maybe it was inflation, immigration, international unrest and reaction against overemphasis on identity politics/gender issues. Nah, that couldnt be it.
 
I dont think you can call Biden an a-hole he was the one fading already early in his term... If you the one fading per definition you're not really responsible anymore. His team on the other hand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top