- Jan 14, 2013
- 26,040
- 24,351
- 136
The difference is you have echoed the comments of a couple folks who insist the candidate doesn't matter .Personally, I thought Hillary was the most qualified candidate in any election in recent history. (Actually much more qualified than Obama, but lacking his charisma). And again, I specifically said both the candidate and the platform matter. I think our main difference is that we disagree on how the Dem platform should evolve. You feel strongly that they need to double down on more liberal policies, while I just a strongly feel that they need to move toward the center to win back at least some of the middle class working voters and the rural vote. A little patriotism wouldn't hurt either, along the lines of "we may have things that need to be corrected, but we are still a great country" instead of dwelling on every injustice, real or perceived. .
It's also almost like you didn't even pay attention to the Democratic platform this election nor watched the convention. It was very patriotic.
And also you're making a big mistake. Qualified is not equal to a good candidate in politics in America. And in many countries.
Last edited: