Democratic Party - Clueless & Feckless - is the D party done?

Page 102 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Paratus

Lifer
Jun 4, 2004
17,767
16,123
146
You can't run up the score like this without a decent chunk of defecting Trump voters.

Seems like there’s a significant opportunity here. The voting population at large is fed up and willing to vote democrat, potentially any democrat. A large progressive swing in the primaries could put enough new blood into congress to make a significant difference.

Might be the best chance for this in decades.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,882
48,659
136
Seems like there’s a significant opportunity here. The voting population at large is fed up and willing to vote democrat, potentially any democrat. A large progressive swing in the primaries could put enough new blood into congress to make a significant difference.

Might be the best chance for this in decades.

Yes, especially older congresspeople who decide it's time to retire this cycle or next (looking at you, Chuck).
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
36,496
10,769
136

KMFJD

Lifer
Aug 11, 2005
34,019
54,805
136
Worst people... 40 years ago.
Even Trump will be remembered as the mere bumbling fool, he who spit hatred but failed to wield it like a true butcher. Those who follow will gleefully kill millions.
i got taken/fooled, it's fake outrage as it was actually put into law by the governator back in 2010

\my bad, still don't like him
 

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
26,794
24,944
136
Democratic leadership banning protest actions during Trump's state of fascism speech coming up. I guess they're scared that Democrats might look mean.

Kick these fuckers out of office. A boycott would only be effective if it's organized by leadership and takes the whole party. As then they all get up and walk out together. That would be quiet, dignified, and very powerful. But that is beyond Democratic leadership. They prefer to sit there and go along with this entire fascist farce because decorum? You don't beat fascism by just sitting quietly. A perfect metaphor for the rot that is Chucky, Hakeem, and all the so-called 'moderate' Dems - and by moderate we should really say, Center-Right wing party.

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Fenixgoon

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
26,794
24,944
136
It pains to me to criticize Obama on some fundamental levels because I love the guy. I truly admire and respect him. I just watched the Hanoi episode of Parts Unknown with him yesterday with my date and always love seeing the man vibe and talk there. But he has definitely lost a lot of touch and still can't simply say things plainly. He does make some good points but is way off about fundamental issues and is incapable of calling out the other side plainly enough. When talking about basically making shit up, it's 'they seem to have gone the other way' instead of just saying, 'let's face it, the core of the opposition simply pathologically lie about everything. They flood the zone, and it's a strategy and it can work' or even just calling a core group of simply being 'racists' when talking about his ape video or ICE agents. Of course he should still say what he said that 'most of America doesn't agree with this' but you also have to tell the truth about those that do. He is incapable.

I watched close to the first half of this so far. A great example of how he is missing reality is how he describes the differences in the democratic party between moderates and progressives as merely tactical, but not really substantive. He could not be more wrong.

 

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
26,794
24,944
136
AOC breaks down how evil the Dem establishment is by how much they literally hate anything actually progressive for average Americans. The Dem establishment literally sees progressives as the enemy, as described by AOC. As in they use the word ENEMY to describe AOC. They literally hate honest and ethical and smart progressives as the enemy, as part of the problem.

There is zero way to trust a party that hates progressives and progressive ideals. AOC is not some crazy loony leftist with loopy ideas and policy goals. They are so corrupt. We must destroy the party from within during the primaries.

 
Last edited:

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
26,794
24,944
136
AOC breaks down how evil the Dem establishment is by how much they literally hate anything actually progressive for average Americans. The Dem establishment literally sees progressives as the enemy, as described by AOC. As in they use the word ENEMY to describe AOC. They literally hate honest and ethical and smart progressives as the enemy, as part of the problem.

There is zero way to trust a party that hates progressives and progressive ideals. AOC is not some crazy loony leftist with loopy ideas and policy goals. They are so corrupt. We must destroy the party from within during the primaries.

@Brainonska511

I took a giant chill pill. What are your honest feelings about this along with the other evidence of the Dems clearly disliking pragmatic progressives and their policy goals. Clearly last year the establishment fought to keep AOC off the oversight committee position - so it's pretty apparent they still feel the same way.
 

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
26,794
24,944
136
Found something that belongs in here:
View attachment 138440

Are you okay with the Democrats corruption because they are all we have? Do you think they're even corrupt at all? Are you upset if you are progressive and they think you are the enemy? Do you think we should try to change them while we try to defeat Maga, because that is all I've argued for. Defeat corrupt Democrats en route to also defeating maga. That's all I've argued. Primary the establishment rot, fight the corrupt leadership, and then vote blue in Novembers. Is that bad to you?

I don't see anybody arguing here not to vote to defeat Maga either. Not sure why it's so relevant because of that. But please explain.
 
Last edited:

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
37,630
33,366
136
Are you okay with the Democrats corruption because they are all we have?
I'm not okay with it but even if they were more corrupt than they currently are I'd still pull the lever for them every chance I got. There is such a vast ocean of difference in corruption levels between Dems and Reps, and more importantly levels of damage done by each party, that it should be reflexive for every rational human being to vote for every single candidate that has a chance to beat any Republican candidate anywhere anytime.


Do you think they're even corrupt at all?
Of course they are corrupt to some degree, but I understand that there are important differences between types of corruption, and some types of corruption are much more important to avoid than others.


Are you upset if you are progressive and they think you are the enemy?
Yes and no. There are likely some areas of the country where it is detrimental to be too progressive. Not because the progressive policies are wrong but because the populations are so damaged that you need to hide the medicine in some fucking cheese.


Do you think we should try to change them while we try to defeat Maga, because that is all I've argued for.
Of course. My post is aimed at people who think Dems are too corrupt or whatever to vote for.


Defeat corrupt Democrats en route to also defeating maga. That's all I've argued. Primary the establishment rot, fight the corrupt leadership, and then vote blue in Novembers. Is that bad to you?

I don't see anybody arguing here not to vote to defeat Maga either. Not sure why it's so relevant because of that. But please explain.
It's relevant because many "independents" read these posts even if they are too scared to post here, and they should know they are doing more harm than good, instead of loading up on ammo to use against Democrats in other forums of political debate.
 

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
26,794
24,944
136
I'm not okay with it but even if they were more corrupt than they currently are I'd still pull the lever for them every chance I got. There is such a vast ocean of difference in corruption levels between Dems and Reps, and more importantly levels of damage done by each party, that it should be reflexive for every rational human being to vote for every single candidate that has a chance to beat any Republican candidate anywhere anytime.



Of course they are corrupt to some degree, but I understand that there are important differences between types of corruption, and some types of corruption are much more important to avoid than others.



Yes and no. There are likely some areas of the country where it is detrimental to be too progressive. Not because the progressive policies are wrong but because the populations are so damaged that you need to hide the medicine in some fucking cheese.



Of course. My post is aimed at people who think Dems are too corrupt or whatever to vote for.



It's relevant because many "independents" read these posts even if they are too scared to post here, and they should know they are doing more harm than good, instead of loading up on ammo to use against Democrats in other forums of political debate.

Well I say we can walk and chew gum at the same time. We can both beat MAGA and reform the party from within. They are so so corrupt - they are literally anti anything progressive, and it took me longer than some friends and family to catch on, but it is insulting how much they have fucked us and lied to us and how center right they really are. Of course next to the Republican party, they are fucking great! I mean duh. But you have to acknowledge how they have exploited the progressive wing of the party, suppressed them, and used that just being better than the GQP to do not much in truly fighting the system by holding a metaphorical carrot on a stick for decades. And we are talking about that carrot being fundamental change to help the vast vast majority of average Americans. It should make you very angry.

I'm really wondering, if this little tiny P&N forum filled with 95% Democrats of which the majority seem to be progressive, is not a safe enough space to discuss both MAGA and the corrupt dems at the same time, then really, where is this safe space you need. You really think we are going to do more harm than good discussing it among ourselves here because a few independent lurkers might get turned off? I do kind of find that very sad, but also wrong.

I think independents would run faster and harder to vote for Dems the more they know they are basically middle of the road corporate whores and will shoot down any actual progressive agendas.

And as far as the Dem strategy has gone over the last decades with sticking with the establishment power structure and fucking over any progressive when they can and where they can, it hasn't worked. Not only do we find ourselves here, but they have no idea how to play the game at all anymore, and they haven't. The super incremental change they support in a system where the masses are crying out for systemic change, and playing solitaire while the GQP under Gingrich and McConnel ate their fucking lunch, totally oblivious to what was really changing in America, the rise of this far right populism is partly due to how fundamentally little the system has changed for the little guy for so long. That is a breeding ground for Trump style motherfuckers. The Dems were happy with tiny slow bits of change because they never wanted anything more in the first place. They love our progressive votes but actually disdain us, think of our progressive leaders as the enemy, and they just used us for our votes way too many times while looking down their noses at us.

Sure they talk a big game sometime but it's all so fake. Vote blue no matter who! A literal tweet from Jeffries, but we know they will do anything to sabotage anything truly progressive - whether a candidate to actual policy. They fucked over Bernie, now I am sure of it. And they conspired to make sure Bernie couldn't win in 2020. They definitely fucked in in 2016, something I doubted but it was more me being in denial of how much Dems saw anything progressive as the literal enemy. They fuck over AOC wherever they can. They were fine with a disgraced sexual predator running as a Dem as long as he could hopefully, HOPEFULLY, beat Mamdani, in New York Damn City of all places!

Every single progressive here almost definitely voted for Kamala in 2024. But I know a lot who held their noses at the same time because they Dems have been fucking progressives over for decades and treating them like suckers, and once you realize it, it's fucking gross. We will always disagree about Biden running in 2024 but myself and all the progressives were right. And not just the progressives, the vast majority of all Dem voters did not want him to run again!

I mean where can we talk about the shit show that is the Dems so we can try to do better with our leaders if not here? Do I need to put a disclaimer in my sig that says, as bad as the Dems are, at least they are not evil, not wholly corrupt like MAGA< and have some fundamental decency to them, and belief in law and science and class. I mean I've expressed that before, and I shit on MAGA here all the time, do I need to staple that sign to my head? If the audience was independents, I would take a different tack. I take a different tack when talking to different audiences.

Obviously there are different approaches in some parts of the country, but in more places than not, dismantling the stranglehold the Dem establishment has is going to work better. Obama was an outlier - he had transcendent presence and charisma, and being half black he represented a page turn for progressives as well as Democrats. I think he was actually a progressive candidate - and even though he turned out to be a bit too weak to fight the system enough, he still won handily based on being viewed as a progressive candidate. Other than him, the Dems have looked like shit. Biden ONLY won because of Covid in 2020 AND BARELY. The only big wins the Dems have had in decades have been with progressives or candidates perceived as progressive. Obama included. Clinton also had charm and charisma and sold himself as more left than he was, but he was still not on the level of being seen as progressive as Obama. I mean shit, Bill Clinton and his treasury secretary were driving forces behind de-regulating the Glass-Steagall act that got us the mortgage crisis. They are garbage people, just not as evil as the Republicans even then.

I mean when you have the Dem leadership telling their caucuses to either sit down and behave while Trump trashes everything the State of the Union is supposed to be, or just not go, and can't organize a total walkout on cue the first time Trump says something disgusting, a very classy silent protest to show how illegitimate Trump really is, then I just don't know what to tell you. I get that haphazard shouting and stuff may not work out well - but a classy silent protest would be so powerful. But the leadership is pathetic. That leadership ALL HAS TO GO!
 
Last edited:

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
26,794
24,944
136

Wow. What a statement by a leaderless, rudderless, and corrupt party apparatus​

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...08f098e42c8356#block-6995f0b98f08f098e42c8356!

Several Democratic lawmakers plan to boycott State of the Union for National Mall rally​

Several Democratic lawmakers will boycott Donald Trump’s address to Congress on Tuesday 24 February, and instead attend a rally on the National Mall.

So far, at least 12 Democratic members of Congress will skip the State of the Union. These include senators Chris Murphy of Connecticut and Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, as well as progressive representatives Pramila Jayapal and Greg Casar.

The event, dubbed the “People’s State of the Union”, is being coordinated by progressive media network MeidasTouch and the liberal advocacy group MoveOn. Attorney and commentator Katie Phang and former anchor Joy Reid will co-host the rally. The event’s organizers say it will spotlight federal workers, immigrants and Americans affected by the Trump administration’s policies.

In a statement, Van Hollen said that he would not attend the joint address to Congress next week. “Trump is marching America towards fascism, and I refuse to normalize his shredding of our Constitution & democracy,” he said. “This cannot be business as usual.”
 

DZero

Platinum Member
Jun 20, 2024
2,204
797
96
Democrats will fail to get the required votes in this years elections and not because the Republicans are awful, but because democrats fails to get those votes.
 

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
26,794
24,944
136
Democrats will fail to get the required votes in this years elections and not because the Republicans are awful, but because democrats fails to get those votes.
I think they will win, for any establishment candidate they will be content just being an anti-Trump vote, and they could care less about not becoming better, or fighting Trump more - they've been counting on doing as little as possible and just being the 'I'm not a Republican' vote for years. They don't want to be better. They like their castles in D.C. and Lobbyist money too much to put their lifestyles at risk. Hell, half of these establishment fucks actually care more about keeping Israel armed and committing genocide than they do actual average Americans.

And I think many progressives will win to - because they are good people that give a shit and want to fight, and people will want to vote for them. Some will be corrupted by power, but many will start to cleanse this rotten carcass of a party.
 

Brovane

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2001
6,540
2,677
136
Well I say we can walk and chew gum at the same time. We can both beat MAGA and reform the party from within. They are so so corrupt - they are literally anti anything progressive, and it took me longer than some friends and family to catch on, but it is insulting how much they have fucked us and lied to us and how center right they really are. Of course next to the Republican party, they are fucking great! I mean duh. But you have to acknowledge how they have exploited the progressive wing of the party, suppressed them, and used that just being better than the GQP to do not much in truly fighting the system by holding a metaphorical carrot on a stick for decades. And we are talking about that carrot being fundamental change to help the vast vast majority of average Americans. It should make you very angry.

I'm really wondering, if this little tiny P&N forum filled with 95% Democrats of which the majority seem to be progressive, is not a safe enough space to discuss both MAGA and the corrupt dems at the same time, then really, where is this safe space you need. You really think we are going to do more harm than good discussing it among ourselves here because a few independent lurkers might get turned off? I do kind of find that very sad, but also wrong.

I think independents would run faster and harder to vote for Dems the more they know they are basically middle of the road corporate whores and will shoot down any actual progressive agendas.

And as far as the Dem strategy has gone over the last decades with sticking with the establishment power structure and fucking over any progressive when they can and where they can, it hasn't worked. Not only do we find ourselves here, but they have no idea how to play the game at all anymore, and they haven't. The super incremental change they support in a system where the masses are crying out for systemic change, and playing solitaire while the GQP under Gingrich and McConnel ate their fucking lunch, totally oblivious to what was really changing in America, the rise of this far right populism is partly due to how fundamentally little the system has changed for the little guy for so long. That is a breeding ground for Trump style motherfuckers. The Dems were happy with tiny slow bits of change because they never wanted anything more in the first place. They love our progressive votes but actually disdain us, think of our progressive leaders as the enemy, and they just used us for our votes way too many times while looking down their noses at us.

Sure they talk a big game sometime but it's all so fake. Vote blue no matter who! A literal tweet from Jeffries, but we know they will do anything to sabotage anything truly progressive - whether a candidate to actual policy. They fucked over Bernie, now I am sure of it. And they conspired to make sure Bernie couldn't win in 2020. They definitely fucked in in 2016, something I doubted but it was more me being in denial of how much Dems saw anything progressive as the literal enemy. They fuck over AOC wherever they can. They were fine with a disgraced sexual predator running as a Dem as long as he could hopefully, HOPEFULLY, beat Mamdani, in New York Damn City of all places!

Every single progressive here almost definitely voted for Kamala in 2024. But I know a lot who held their noses at the same time because they Dems have been fucking progressives over for decades and treating them like suckers, and once you realize it, it's fucking gross. We will always disagree about Biden running in 2024 but myself and all the progressives were right. And not just the progressives, the vast majority of all Dem voters did not want him to run again!

I mean where can we talk about the shit show that is the Dems so we can try to do better with our leaders if not here? Do I need to put a disclaimer in my sig that says, as bad as the Dems are, at least they are not evil, not wholly corrupt like MAGA< and have some fundamental decency to them, and belief in law and science and class. I mean I've expressed that before, and I shit on MAGA here all the time, do I need to staple that sign to my head? If the audience was independents, I would take a different tack. I take a different tack when talking to different audiences.

Obviously there are different approaches in some parts of the country, but in more places than not, dismantling the stranglehold the Dem establishment has is going to work better. Obama was an outlier - he had transcendent presence and charisma, and being half black he represented a page turn for progressives as well as Democrats. I think he was actually a progressive candidate - and even though he turned out to be a bit too weak to fight the system enough, he still won handily based on being viewed as a progressive candidate. Other than him, the Dems have looked like shit. Biden ONLY won because of Covid in 2020 AND BARELY. The only big wins the Dems have had in decades have been with progressives or candidates perceived as progressive. Obama included. Clinton also had charm and charisma and sold himself as more left than he was, but he was still not on the level of being seen as progressive as Obama. I mean shit, Bill Clinton and his treasury secretary were driving forces behind de-regulating the Glass-Steagall act that got us the mortgage crisis. They are garbage people, just not as evil as the Republicans even then.

I mean when you have the Dem leadership telling their caucuses to either sit down and behave while Trump trashes everything the State of the Union is supposed to be, or just not go, and can't organize a total walkout on cue the first time Trump says something disgusting, a very classy silent protest to show how illegitimate Trump really is, then I just don't know what to tell you. I get that haphazard shouting and stuff may not work out well - but a classy silent protest would be so powerful. But the leadership is pathetic. That leadership ALL HAS TO GO!

I think a key problem I see with the Democrats is they can't get out of their own "fucking way" to get shit done.

A example of that would be the NEVI ( National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure) program authorized in 2021. In total since 2021 this program has built about 150 charging stations. WTF?
In the same period Elmo on a Ketamine high managed to get Tesla to build 2,000+ charging stations, like WTF are they doing? They fucked around so long that now Orange stain is back in office and now he can further fuck it up. Are they trying to fail?

Democrats are to focused on the process over results. The Democrats have consistently failed to demonstrate that even handed the keys they cannot generate affordable housing, improved healthcare for everyone and improved public works and infrastructure. They put so many rules on any government process it strangles the process and then when the public doesn't see results they vote the Authoritarians back in and now the circle jerk is complete.
 

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
26,794
24,944
136
The Democratic establishment is bought and paid for by the rich - which has been obvious. But now their billionaire donor handlers are speaking up. The bolded part at the end is hilarious - and scary. Fuck any candidate the billionaires want. And he thought Kamala was a socialist lol She lost because she went to your side. He wants Bill Clinton Democrats - fuck no! Fuck Bill Clinton Democrats! Fuck 'em all to hell.

and progressives are mostly winning their elections and the Dems have the lowest approval rating because of the shitty Dems their corporate donors want to win suck at their jobs and people are seeing right through them.

What a shit show.


"
Former Democratic megadonor John Morgan warned that the party has effectively split in two as Democrats continue to elevate candidates with weaker general election appeal, such as Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., while economic insecurity leaves many Americans vulnerable to socialist messaging.

"There's a future for her [Ocasio-Cortez] because, look, the Democratic Party is two parties. It's socialist, and Bill Clinton Democrats, like me. I'm a Bill Clinton Democrat. I'm the opposite of a socialist," Morgan said Tuesday on "Jesse Watters Primetime."

He claimed that 40% of Americans do not have $400 saved and that 60% live paycheck to paycheck, leaving many desperate for promises of "free" benefits.

AOC REPEATEDLY DENIES 2028 AMBITIONS, SLAMS GLOBAL CONFERENCE AS DISMISSIVE TO 'CLASS-BASED MESSAGE'

"They want something. The best word in advertising in the whole world is the word 'free.' Buy one, get one free. She's selling free."

Morgan’s assessment of Ocasio-Cortez’s political prospects followed her controversial appearance at the Munich Security Conference over the weekend. Her response to a question about whether the U.S. should commit troops to defend Taiwan from a potential Chinese attack was derided by critics as a "word salad," sparking debate about the young Democrat’s future.

AOC MOCKED FOR ‘ABSOLUTE TRAIN WRECK’ WEEKEND ON GLOBAL STAGE: 'MADE A FOOL OUT OF HERSELF'

"This is, of course, a, a very long-standing, policy of the United States, and I think what we are hoping for is that we want to make sure that we never get to that point, and we want to make sure that we are moving in all of our economic research and our global positions to avoid any such confrontation and for that question to even arise," Ocasio-Cortez said.

Morgan said the response sounded like Ocasio-Cortez took a page from the "Kamala word salad school for the Trump deranged."

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

He criticized other Democratic frontrunners like former Vice President Kamala Harris and California Gov. Gavin Newsom, arguing that figures like Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear, former White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel and Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker would pose stronger challenges to Republicans.

"But the Democrats are always hell-bent on nominating someone who has the least chance of winning and not the best chance," he said.


Fox News Digital's Peter Pinedo contributed to this report.
 
Last edited:

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,983
6,809
126
I think a key problem I see with the Democrats is they can't get out of their own "fucking way" to get shit done.

A example of that would be the NEVI ( National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure) program authorized in 2021. In total since 2021 this program has built about 150 charging stations. WTF?
In the same period Elmo on a Ketamine high managed to get Tesla to build 2,000+ charging stations, like WTF are they doing? They fucked around so long that now Orange stain is back in office and now he can further fuck it up. Are they trying to fail?

Democrats are to focused on the process over results. The Democrats have consistently failed to demonstrate that even handed the keys they cannot generate affordable housing, improved healthcare for everyone and improved public works and infrastructure. They put so many rules on any government process it strangles the process and then when the public doesn't see results they vote the Authoritarians back in and now the circle jerk is complete.
I think Democrats are paralyzed by fear of losing elections, any action would offend enough people to lose them. The result is that inaction causes them to lose elections. This happens because the real motivation is fear of loss not moral conviction to do what is right. Their main concerns are for themselves and their political viability. Another issue is that they aren’t paid by productivity or public approval but set their own salaries. Imagine allowing people who feel worthless to determine a substitute an acclaimed signifier of self worth, the thing we all worship, now much they make at their own discretion. Not only do they own the candy store but they are fed intravenously. What a way to build character.
 
Last edited:

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
26,794
24,944
136
I think Democrats are paralyzed by fear of losing elections, any action would offend enough people to lose them. The result is that inaction causes them to lose elections. This happens because the real motivation is fear of loss not moral conviction to do what is right. Their main concerns are for themselves and their political viability. Another issue is that they aren’t paid by productivity or public approval but set their own salaries. Imagine allowing people who feel worthless to determine a substitute an acclaimed signifier of self worth, the thing we all worship, now much they make at their own discretion. Not only do they own the candy store but they are fed intravenously. What a way to build character.
This is pretty well-said. I'd also like to add that a lot of them are just corrupt and beholden to billionaire, other wealthy, Israel, and certain corporate donors. Certainly not like the republicans at all, but way more than enough to not really give a shit about any fundamental change to help average Americans; just enough to keep the breadcrumb trail going. They see fundamental and structural change that would really lift average Americans up as evil, the enemy, and simply wrong. Think of any western European system we would look up to as progressives, the establishment Dems think that is blasphemy and way too leftist.
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
36,496
10,769
136
I take it he intends to use the law to do it.
The man spoke of his own local power as DA... but if one were to apply the notion of upholding the law at federal level....
The idea that we would one day win an election and MAGA Nazis would accept the result without widespread or substantive violence.
After Jan 6th, I consider such an outcome unlikely, if not impossible. But if our Democracy can continue to exist without violence, I do endorse that path.

I want it, I just don't believe the others will allow it.
I can sit by and wait for ya'll to come to the same conclusion. Nazis will not disappoint in that regard. They will continue to act against our Democracy.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,983
6,809
126
This is pretty well-said. I'd also like to add that a lot of them are just corrupt and beholden to billionaire, other wealthy, Israel, and certain corporate donors. Certainly not like the republicans at all, but way more than enough to not really give a shit about any fundamental change to help average Americans; just enough to keep the breadcrumb trail going. They see fundamental and structural change that would really lift average Americans up as evil, the enemy, and simply wrong. Think of any western European system we would look up to as progressives, the establishment Dems think that is blasphemy and way too leftist.
Yes, that is a systemic problem neither party will fix. Our whole political system is based on acquiring enough political power to deliver the financial contributions required to run campaigns, in shorty, the wealthy elect who will rum by who will take bribes. Once that roots itself into the heart of the political system one’s political longevity, with a few exceptions here and there, is determined by those most willing to accept those bribes. These are exactly the bottom feeders most motivated to preserve the system as is in my opinion
 
  • Like
Reactions: hal2kilo