default vcore for a 1600+

m1ke101

Platinum Member
Mar 30, 2001
2,825
0
0
i had my 1600+ overclocked with a 166fsb but it hit me that i didn't really need to overclock, so i just left it stock at 1.4ghz and lowered the vcore the lowest i could, which was 1.4 and it seems to be stable. is default vcore 1.75? is a 1.4 vcore safe for the cpu?
 

dannybin1742

Platinum Member
Jan 16, 2002
2,335
0
0
yes default is 1.75, i'm not sure its dangerous to have a low vcore, your computer will just be less stable, and probably generate more errors
 

m1ke101

Platinum Member
Mar 30, 2001
2,825
0
0
left it to run prime95 for 9 hours last night so i'm thinking its pretty stable, but still want to know if a low vcore will do anything to cpu.
 

jaybee

Senior member
Apr 5, 2002
562
0
0
Your cpu will be very happy. You should 7-volt or maybe 5-volt your cpu fan.

jaybee
 

m1ke101

Platinum Member
Mar 30, 2001
2,825
0
0
i'm getting about 34C idle and 40C full load, i think the temps would be a bit lower if i plugged in a couple other fans i have in my case. i'm using a ax-7 with a really quiet and thus low output fan. this is at stock 1.4ghz.
 

EKAtBzboyz

Senior member
Nov 1, 2002
323
0
0
there is nothing wrong with undervolting

theoretically it would do exact opposite of overvolting i would think

i had my 1ghz tbird running at 1.4v for over 5-6 months and only thing i noticed was cooler temps :)

sounds like its stable enough, but if you want super stable
download 3dmark2001
start up prime 95 torture test and loop 3dmark about 50-60 times (it will take quite a while for it to end, maybe overnight or something would be nice)

if it withstands that, then id say you are good to go
 

m1ke101

Platinum Member
Mar 30, 2001
2,825
0
0
alright i undervolted my fans to 7v and now i'm getting 39C under full loaad and 32C ambient temp.