FelixDeCat
Lifer
GOP talking points:
1. Minimize government intervention
2. Government not doing much is clearly government's fault.
Democrat talking points:
1) Russia
2) Mueller
3) Obstruct Trump by any means necessary, ie. Russia, Mueller.
GOP talking points:
1. Minimize government intervention
2. Government not doing much is clearly government's fault.
The irresponsible pursuit of globalization and free trade without developing a strategy to redirect displaced workers, failure to prevent the consolidation of corporate conglomerates, failure to prosecute the Wall Street architects of the Enron and Housing Crisis eras. Protecting the interests of corporations over workers is tipping the scales against the middle class.
Democrat talking points:
1) Russia
2) Mueller
3) Obstruct Trump by any means necessary, ie. Russia, Mueller.
Bronco Bama is to blame for not jailing one bankster for the housing crises and there was plenty of blame to go around. Granted many banks have paid billions in fines and civil lawsuits over the last 9 years for selling scam mortgages while making bets against them (Goldman fraud). And Bronco did help bring about the CFPB, which I support, but not one of those banksters like Jaime Dimon or that bald headed crime boss Blankfien @ GS went to jail.
Both of those individuals are paid roughly $11,250 per hour (each) to find different ways of screwing people out of their money, yet neither even got a slap on the wrist.
Try 60 years, 50 puts it during Reagan, he was the one who started it.
LOL. Trump winning 62millions votes the same as your guy Romney is really the democrats/medias fault. Maybe they used millions of those illegals voting to boost how popular the birther magnate is with your party. All that riled up trump trash at the "they coming for our white womens" rallies are just dnc plants.
Just look at how pathetic you & peers here are, working so hard to proclaim a mountain out of every pissant mole hole. Gotta give the confederate numbers their uppity brown person stories to chew on.
Not hard to figure out degen politics.
Let's not pretend you're too dumb to understand mexican rapists, kenyan muslims, and "black riggers in those areas, you know what I'm talking about". Those midwest crowds sure got rile up by what he's talking about, unless you feel compelled for the sake of this argument to lower your iq beneath even them.
Trump was asked early during the campaign why he's always going on about mexicans & muslims instead of serious policy, and his surprisingly candid reply was that the crowd got bored/quiet whenever he talked econ or whatever but energized whenever the wall got 10ft taller.
No great mystery why trumpsters & co want democrats to talk economic policy while they amplify stories about some uppity Pakistani working in a D congressional office.
No, pretty obvious you love to play dumb same as them when honesty isn't in your best interest.
No, it's just empirical reality that racial resentment is basically the best predictor of party affiliation, it's a well researched scientific phenomenon. Degenerates & friends are so called because they lack the basic honesty to address empirical realities, while pretending to openness and honest out the side of their mouth. And this is no coincidence given rejecting science & such is what conservatism is all about.
LOL @ conservative blaming obama for compromising onto their own health care plan, the same one their degen friends were busy torpedoing right after; these pieces of shit will try to argue anything.\
Casting conservatives making 72k/yr as the real victims here really is something. But I can't blame them because many democrats are goddamn stupid enough to believe it. Christ they get played so easy.
Capitalism obviously the fault of mexican rapists and muslim terrorists--welcome to the party of personal responsibility.
It would help your argument to first figure out how scales work.
Perfect job buying into the conservative narrative that people making far more than than national average with well below average edu/credentials are looking to "burn it down". Liberals are so easy to play.
That's true the simple fact that you can only parrot GOP talking points isn't long format discussion material. It's actually pretty disappointing because I used to think there existed conservatives capable of thinking for themselves. But then you started blaming billary/obama for trump russian collusion same as your klansmen allies. Great job repping what the party stands for.
Typical degen blathering in lieu of addressing anything said.
No amount of deflection will alter the fundamental fact that capitalists sharing talking points with racists to mutual benefit is just about the only thing worth addressing with their party line sort.
GOP talking points:
1. Minimize government intervention
2. Government not doing much is clearly government's fault.
Seems the religious are well there are no consequences to low moral character.
Immaculate demonstration of the shared felix/chucky/starbuck GOP storyline.
Democrat talking points:
1) Russia
2) Mueller
3) Obstruct Trump by any means necessary, ie. Russia, Mueller.
and republicans don't care. SAD!
but blowjobs: very important!
@Starbuck - I know what you're trying to say and do, but could you not quote the shit out of agent?
That's why we need the job creators . . . blowjob creators!I agree that blowjobs are VERY important. When my wife stopped giving me them I realized just how important they were..... REAL DAMN IMPORTANT!!!
yea that was some epic quoting. remember when quotes were nested in windows and you would have window chains and there were like 100 windows inside each other decreasing in size in one post lol.
Democrat talking points:
1) Russia
2) Mueller
3) Obstruct Trump by any means necessary, ie. Russia, Mueller.
Yup, now I understand why you guys had so much Benghazi, Birther fun
Feels good getting the same level of crap back doesn't it
You're forgetting the last 6 months have been measured in Trump time so 50 years sounds about right subjectively.Your math sucks. Reagan was in office January 20 1981. that was only 36 years ago.
We're only on the first investigation. not comparable yet, and yet the Con's still ramble on about it like an estranged family member.
You've done an admirable job of distraction from the purpose of this thread with your usual nonsense.
Although interestingly enough, DWS is now playing the racial profiling card as an excuse for not firing this guy. Are you feeding her talking points flail, be honest? At the very least, she is using the same race smoke grenades that you use.
You are clearly incapable of considering multiple narrative threads.This pakistani it guy story is inherent distraction from matters of importance like the president colluding with putin & such, literally the same as those frequent uppity minority threads your peers used to create. This video nails the nature of such stories perfectly: https://www.vox.com/videos/2017/7/21/16008190/strikethrough-white-supremacists-love-tucker-carlson
No real mystery the GOP shills' intent here, except maybe to dumbshit tier democrats.
You are clearly incapable of considering multiple narrative threads.
Let's say ethics are on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being a catastrophic breach of ethics.
Trump and the Russian-Putin connection is a 10^infinity
The DWS story is around a 3. The DWS is of interest only because she was one of the central architects in the chain of events that led to Clinton's defeat. This story is just another indication of her incompetence.
Discussing DWS in no way distracts from the Russian story, unless you are an easily distracted fvcking idiot.
Unless of course you condone members of Congress threatening law enforcement with "consequences" for doing their job. She seems more concerned about recovering computer hardware than the crimes allegedly committed by her IT guy. Doesn't pass the sniff test. The optics are horrible.
As I said, it's only distracting to the easily distracted. So much flail.These are literally the stories Fox & friends are running with in lieu of. Mexican rapists and arab-looking it guys (prolly a terrorist); it's all so very concerning.
Perfect job carrying their water to demonstrate my point.
As I said, it's only distracting to the easily distracted. So much flail.
Your math sucks. Reagan was in office January 20 1981. that was only 36 years ago.
Well said.Now we're talking. I grew up in a blue state in a community where very few of the adults had college educations. The dads of all of my friends were carpenters, masons, electricians, plumbers, etc. All came from late 19th or early 20th century immigrant families. All made enough to own respectable homes, take their kids to Disneyworld every summer and live honest, comfortable middle class lives.
Many of their sons and daughters followed in the footsteps of their family businesses as college was prohibitively expensive. Not many of them benefitted during the stock market runs of the 90s, but they certainly felt the pain of the subsequent recessions. Not only that, they are now competing with undocumented labor working at a fraction of their rates.
They played by the rules. They had a good thing going. And now that world is crumbling around them.
They are angry and emotional. They feel the government no longer serves them. They want things to be the way they were. Most are now avid Trump supporters.
It is easy to exploit emotions and offer simple solutions to complex problems. Build a wall!!! Keep out the Muslims!!! Those solutions start to make a lot of sense when the alternative is no solution at all.
Dismissing these people as racists and degenerates only makes them more angry, and causes them to entrench further into their FoxNews world.
That was your opportunity to say something relevant to the thread. Keep on flailing on.That was your opportunity to have a little more self-respect than Felix/chucky.
I'm in the exact same boat. I try to rationalize it by thinking that while it definitely hurt us financially, it also disproportionately helped those who were honestly unable to afford health insurance due to pre-existing conditions. That at least takes out a bit of sting.I know I've said it before....My family of 4 was totally screwed by the ACA.
I have personal family that benefit from the ACA.
Tough call...
I don't like bailing insurance companies out of their own shitty mess....but I don't like the fact that American's can't access healthcare due to costs.
Well said.