- Oct 18, 2003
- 1,496
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: Tiles2Tech
This is great news.
Now, for those Dems who kept calling Bush a "chicken" for refusing the 3rd debate, I think it's time y'all made a public apology.
If he didn't want to do it, all he had to do was say no. Kerry never officially accepted either - was he trying to get out of it by hiring whoever his debate management person is? :roll:Originally posted by: Todd33
Originally posted by: Tiles2Tech
This is great news.
Now, for those Dems who kept calling Bush a "chicken" for refusing the 3rd debate, I think it's time y'all made a public apology.
Ya, he was no chicken, he only brought in James Baker and tried for over two months to get out of the third.
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
If he didn't want to do it, all he had to do was say no. Kerry never officially accepted either - was he trying to get out of it by hiring whoever his debate management person is? :roll:Originally posted by: Todd33
Originally posted by: Tiles2Tech
This is great news.
Now, for those Dems who kept calling Bush a "chicken" for refusing the 3rd debate, I think it's time y'all made a public apology.
Ya, he was no chicken, he only brought in James Baker and tried for over two months to get out of the third.
Democratic candidate John Kerry's debate team, led by Washington lawyer Vernon Jordan, agreed in July to three presidential debates and one vice-presidential meeting.
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
Bush could have said no but didn't. He didn't try to get out of the debates or he simply wouldn't have agreed. No one would vote any differently if he turned down one debate.
Kerry is no saint for offering a debate a week. He can make such an offer because he doesn't actually do his job. He's like the guy from Office Space - he's not going to quit, he's just not going to go anymore. Some people have work to do and actually do it, and the president doesn't have 99 other people that do the same job that can cover for him.
:roll:Originally posted by: Spencer278
yeah a debate a week would really put a dent on bushes record long vacations.
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
:roll:Originally posted by: Spencer278
yeah a debate a week would really put a dent on bushes record long vacations.
The triteness of every statement made by an anti-Bush person in this forum is ridiculous to the point of predictability.
Originally posted by: Spencer278
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
:roll:Originally posted by: Spencer278
yeah a debate a week would really put a dent on bushes record long vacations.
The triteness of every statement made by an anti-Bush person in this forum is ridiculous to the point of predictability.
Well don't pretend that Bush is working his ass off. Bush doesn't want weekly debates because he would be unable to get his script writers to write an answer for every question.
I never said Bush was working hard, just that he shows up to work a lot more than Kerry. Oh, and that includes his vacation time. Kerry gets vacations built in to his schedule, yet still misses a completely inordinate number of senate votes.Originally posted by: Spencer278
Well don't pretend that Bush is working his ass off. Bush doesn't want weekly debates because he would be unable to get his script writers to write an answer for every question.
Originally posted by: Tiles2Tech
This is great news.
Now, for those Dems who kept calling Bush a "chicken" for refusing the 3rd debate, I think it's time y'all made a public apology.
Originally posted by: Genx87
Clinton did 2 debates in 96
Originally posted by: NightCrawler
Who cares, the debates are already in the can.
Democrats = Kerry won the debates hands down.
Republicans = Bush won the debates hands down.
Undecided = I watched sportscenter !
Originally posted by: JHoNNy1OoO
Story
Senior Bush and Kerry sources said one of the last things the campaigns were negotiating was how the candidates would get their cues.
A senior Kerry source said the Bush campaign was "hung up" over whether a light or something audible like a buzzer would be used to tell the candidates when their time is up. A Bush official acknowledged that last-minute questions, mostly over the time cue issue, held up the agreement.
Ultimately, a compromise was reached: Timing lights will flash when there are 30 seconds, 15 seconds and five seconds remaining. An audible cue will then go off to note the end of time for a response, and the moderator will step in.
"The audible cue shall be clearly audible to both candidates, the debate audiences and television viewers," the agreement says.
Originally posted by: cKGunslinger
Originally posted by: JHoNNy1OoO
Story
Jeez, could they get any more anal?
Senior Bush and Kerry sources said one of the last things the campaigns were negotiating was how the candidates would get their cues.
A senior Kerry source said the Bush campaign was "hung up" over whether a light or something audible like a buzzer would be used to tell the candidates when their time is up. A Bush official acknowledged that last-minute questions, mostly over the time cue issue, held up the agreement.
Ultimately, a compromise was reached: Timing lights will flash when there are 30 seconds, 15 seconds and five seconds remaining. An audible cue will then go off to note the end of time for a response, and the moderator will step in.
"The audible cue shall be clearly audible to both candidates, the debate audiences and television viewers," the agreement says.
Originally posted by: Tiles2Tech
This is great news.
Now, for those Dems who kept calling Bush a "chicken" for refusing the 3rd debate, I think it's time y'all made a public apology.
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
What a chicken Bush is. He wanted two debates and caved.