sandorski
No Lifer
- Oct 10, 1999
- 70,784
- 6,344
- 126
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Fail you. That is not what we are saying. We know when they are posting as members or as moderators, they say so. That's not the part that we are talking about. It's the whole premise.Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: JohnCU
QFTx100Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: MercenaryYoureFired
I agree with a lot of the posts that say Derek/Higher admins are part of the problem. AFAIK Derek is an editor for the Anandtech site; putting someone like that in charge of a popular forum is a recipe for disaster. He simply doesn't have the experience necessary to make/keep the forum successful (No updates, changing what was already working, etc), especially with all the changes he implemented. They should have hired someone in know of how forums work.
I mean seriously, voting for every single mod? That's possibly the worst idea ever, it just ends up being a huge popularity contest; mods should be upstanding citizens of the forum hand picked by the other mods who consistently see their contributions. I doubt you will ever find another forum on the internet that's literally "vote and whoever wins gets mod privileges", with pseudo campaigns and all, ridiculous (In either case, I do respect a lot of the mods here, and think a lot of them do a great job, of course I do think the opposite as well IE "Mods can post as regular members and therefore be piece of shit human beings if they so chose" Mods should be upstanding in their "normal" posting form as well is what I'm trying to say).
I beg to differ. The mods weren't exactly voted in by a popular vote. They were scrutinized and given the ok by the existing mods. That's a fact. No one got a free pass in because they were just voted in. I am proof of that. I was nominated, but was booted out because there are mod(s) who told Derek "no way no how". If it were by popular vote alone I would've been in. At least that is the story I was given.
I think the "mods posting as members" is crap too. If you are a moderator, you are a moderator. If you are the President of the U.S., you are always going to carry around that title. You don't get a free pass to be a dink and claim, "I'm just going to be a *regular* person today."
Whoever thought that one up?
If you don't like being a moderator and having to live up to the title and the standard then step down and be "a regular member".
I also agree with you that 99% of the mods do a great job and can join in the posting just fine without having to use the "posting as a member" veil.
Fail. The Rule is very simple, if they are posting as Mod, they state it or Edit someone else Post with the comment. What's so hard to understand?
The "Premise"? So you'd prefer they were just anonymous and continue posting anyway?
There is no "premise", there are only those who can't help, but grasp at anything to throw at someone they disagree with. Consequently getting Vacated for bringing up "Mod" in the ensuing attack. If you can't handle it, Logout.
It's obvious you just came in here to cause trouble and not offer any solutions. You are part of the problem.
hehe, ya, I guess so. Let's just disagree on this then.