Death penalty poll

retrospooty

Platinum Member
Apr 3, 2002
2,031
74
86
I am a liberal, but I am very much for the death penalty. In fact I thin kwe should not only keep it, we should expand it dramatically. There should be no life in prison sentence, just kill 'em all. Not as a crime deterrent, there are plenty of studies done that show the death penalty doesnt deter crime, but as a means of waste disposal. Why house these assholes for the next 60 years at our expense? Its a miserable life for them and a never-ending cost for us.
 
Oct 25, 2006
11,036
11
91
On one hand, I don't have qualms about killing violent criminals. On the other hand, Life without Parole sucks more.
 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
I don't trust the government and a dozen strangers to decide whether I should live or die.
 

Hacp

Lifer
Jun 8, 2005
13,923
2
81
Originally posted by: retrospooty
I am a liberal, but I am very much for the death penalty. In fact I thin kwe should not only keep it, we should expand it dramatically. There should be no life in prison sentence, just kill 'em all. Not as a crime deterrent, there are plenty of studies done that show the death penalty doesnt deter crime, but as a means of waste disposal. Why house these assholes for the next 60 years at our expense? Its a miserable life for them and a never-ending cost for us.

+1 even if you're a liberal!
 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
I am against the death penalty for two reasons.

1. The death penalty is irreversible, its already known and proven, sometimes juries convict the wrong person.

2. Given our legal system and all the inordinate costly appeals involved in a death sentence, its far far cheaper to house and feed a miscreant for the rest of their natural life. And maybe a more effective punishment.
 

miniMUNCH

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 2000
4,159
0
0
I don't think killing criminals solves anything...

On the flip-flop, I think our prison system is way too soft. The prison system should be hard, hard labor camps and operate with the goal of being non-profit, whilst trying to minimize loss.
 

retrospooty

Platinum Member
Apr 3, 2002
2,031
74
86
Originally posted by: miniMUNCH
I don't think killing criminals solves anything...

It solves the billions of dollars we spend housing and feeding these wastes of skin.
 

ZeGermans

Banned
Dec 14, 2004
907
0
0
Originally posted by: retrospooty
Originally posted by: miniMUNCH
I don't think killing criminals solves anything...

It solves the billions of dollars we spend housing and feeding these wastes of skin.

haha you think violent crime has anything to do with the costs of the prison system
 

retrospooty

Platinum Member
Apr 3, 2002
2,031
74
86
Originally posted by: Lemon law

2. Given our legal system and all the inordinate costly appeals involved in a death sentence, its far far cheaper to house and feed a miscreant for the rest of their natural life. And maybe a more effective punishment.

the point is do it quick, no endless appeals. At least in cases where its overwhelmingly obvious that the person is guilty, like DNA evidence etc.
 

retrospooty

Platinum Member
Apr 3, 2002
2,031
74
86
Originally posted by: ZeGermans
Originally posted by: retrospooty
Originally posted by: miniMUNCH
I don't think killing criminals solves anything...

It solves the billions of dollars we spend housing and feeding these wastes of skin.

haha you think violent crime has anything to do with the costs of the prison system

No, I dont - I stated in my OP that I want the DP not as a crime deterrent, but a a means of waste disposal.

As far as the cost, if there were no prison, there would be no way to waste the money spent on it.
 

heyheybooboo

Diamond Member
Jun 29, 2007
6,278
0
0
:shocked: at expanding the death penalty

The State will kill you for embezzlement and fraud in China.

The State will kill you for sodomy in Iran.

The State will kill you for prostitution in North Korea.

The State will kill you for many nonviolent offenses in Saudi Arabia.

The State will kill you for processing 500 grams of cannabis (an LB) in Singapore.

The State will kill you for verbal opposition to the government in Syria.

The State will kill you for adultery and homosexuality in Yemen.

The State will kill you for sabotage to public utilities in Algeria.

There also seems to be general acceptance in a dozen or so countries in the State killing for apostasy.
 

WHAMPOM

Diamond Member
Feb 28, 2006
7,628
183
106
Originally posted by: retrospooty
I am a liberal, but I am very much for the death penalty. In fact I thin kwe should not only keep it, we should expand it dramatically. There should be no life in prison sentence, just kill 'em all. Not as a crime deterrent, there are plenty of studies done that show the death penalty doesnt deter crime, but as a means of waste disposal. Why house these assholes for the next 60 years at our expense? Its a miserable life for them and a never-ending cost for us.

The American Justice System kills enough people accidentally on purpose as it is. What do you want next? Cops armed with kill sticks for minor traffic offenses?
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
72,409
32,992
136
Originally posted by: WHAMPOM
What do you want next? Cops armed with kill sticks for minor traffic offenses?

I'm opposed to the death penalty but now you're tempting me.
 

retrospooty

Platinum Member
Apr 3, 2002
2,031
74
86
Originally posted by: WHAMPOM
Originally posted by: retrospooty
I am a liberal, but I am very much for the death penalty. In fact I thin kwe should not only keep it, we should expand it dramatically. There should be no life in prison sentence, just kill 'em all. Not as a crime deterrent, there are plenty of studies done that show the death penalty doesnt deter crime, but as a means of waste disposal. Why house these assholes for the next 60 years at our expense? Its a miserable life for them and a never-ending cost for us.

The American Justice System kills enough people accidentally on purpose as it is. What do you want next? Cops armed with kill sticks for minor traffic offenses?

No... But for crimes serious enough for a sentence of life in prison, it should be death. Obviously not petty theifs, traffic violators, or small things like that.

another one that pisses me off is child molesters. Even if found guilty most of them spend only a few years in jail - that one should be death by bing tied down and honey glazed over a fire ant nest. =)
 

imported_Lothar

Diamond Member
Aug 10, 2006
4,559
1
0
Death penalty in itself is stupid since the victim suffers nothing for his/her crimes.
Allowing prisoners to sit in prisons the way it's done here is just as stupid as well if it's not done the way France does it for their terrorist suspects/convicts.

Community service should be mandatory for prison inmates that don't have a medical disability.
Instead of letting them rot in prisons all day long or giving them the easy way out through the electric chair/gas chamber, make them work.
Make them do something productive like digging a ditch for a new dam, bridge, pick up trash, or something else(Panama Canal anyone?).
Hell, they can even replace the union workers that work for Ford, GM, and Chrysler since they won't be paid a wage or anything.
 

BarrySotero

Banned
Apr 30, 2009
509
0
0
I would be "for it" if I knew only guilty people would get punished. As things are I know innocent people would get punished. A guy I knew just got out of jail after spending 17 years in jail for a murder he did not commit. DNA showed he was not the killer and then the real killer confessed.
 

LunarRay

Diamond Member
Mar 2, 2003
9,993
1
76
I'm against the death penalty for lots of reasons.
A viable alternative would be to imprison the capital crime convictee at Moonbeam's house.
Mainly, I suppose, it is in the determination of who will stand trial for the capital crime and face death as a possible sentence that I don't like... that and the fact that the same evidence defended or prosecuted by different folks in front of the same jury can result in a different outcome as well as changing the jury with the same attorneys or change the judge... all these variables can alter the outcome.. I don't like that at all.
Not to mention murder is a legal term but causing another person to cease living is a humanity term... when we become human ... perhaps we too will invoke humane actions.
 

Newbian

Lifer
Aug 24, 2008
24,779
882
126
Originally posted by: ironwing
Originally posted by: WHAMPOM
What do you want next? Cops armed with kill sticks for minor traffic offenses?

I'm opposed to the death penalty but now you're tempting me.

Coming to P&N usually makes one feel that way.
 

Colt45

Lifer
Apr 18, 2001
19,720
1
0
Abolish the death penalty, but institute automatic hard labour for violent crime.

16hr days crushing rocks, with a ration consisting of a can of sardines and a bottle of water. Might make criminals think twice.
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,359
126
I am against it. For two reasons. First, I believe death is an easy out, and life without parole in place of it would be a MUCH harsher penalty. I want the fucker to suffer. Second, it is nothing more than revenge killing. But its not called that because the government does it. If a citizen did it, it would be revenge, and I dont think our government should be in that business.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Originally posted by: retrospooty
Originally posted by: miniMUNCH
I don't think killing criminals solves anything...

It solves the billions of dollars we spend housing and feeding these wastes of skin.

IMO, you are not 'liberal' on this issue. You have clearly de-humanized these people, which is not the 'liberal' position.

I'm not saying it's impssible to be liberal and find some argument for this - even if I disagree with it - but you go further, with the de-humanizing language showing your view.

But, putting that aside, how can you not have picked up somewhere along the way the basic fact as you complain about the cost, that it's cheaper to keep them in priison?

A few years ago, the figures were that the average life sentence was about a third the cost of the legal proceedings required for safeguarding the process constitutionally required.

Take your pick - the cost savings of not executing, the possibility of an innocent person being executed (a near-certainty IMO over time), respect for human life.

Any one of which is a reason not to allow executions.
 

Mursilis

Diamond Member
Mar 11, 2001
7,756
11
81
Originally posted by: Colt45
Abolish the death penalty, but institute automatic hard labour for violent crime.

16hr days crushing rocks, with a ration consisting of a can of sardines and a bottle of water. Might make criminals think twice.

This. I don't support the death penalty either, but prisoners on the inside should be forced to work as hard as people on the outside. Ideally, prisons should be close to self-sustaining. It's only fair - there are no freebies in life, and life in prison should not be easy. I earn my food and shelter - a prisoner should as well.