-
We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.
Dead Tbred? Post here!
- Thread starter Actaeon
- Start date
good thread here...I was waiting for this myslef as an intel user but an avid ocer... was wondering how amds .13 offering was able to achieve such high vcore with little initial effect...
When you look at it:
P4 northwood = 1.5v default and 1.85v being dnager...my damaged not death of a 1.8a happened at 1.83v...It still overclocked 425mhz the day I removed it....
AMD Tbred(.13) = 1.6v default and 1.95v being the magic number I see here and 2 other cases I have seen...
What does this say??? It seems as AMD chips take a bity more but the delta is very similar o the damage threshold og the p4.....It is too early to tell for sure but I do see many reference they do not want to gover 1.85v which would be like a p4 user not going over 1.75v. The 1.75v has been a recognized warning area for quite some time now and it seems to limit damage to the p4's...
The main thing is actual vcore...Are those 1.95v the bios set vcore or actual idle and load vcore???
When you look at it:
P4 northwood = 1.5v default and 1.85v being dnager...my damaged not death of a 1.8a happened at 1.83v...It still overclocked 425mhz the day I removed it....
AMD Tbred(.13) = 1.6v default and 1.95v being the magic number I see here and 2 other cases I have seen...
What does this say??? It seems as AMD chips take a bity more but the delta is very similar o the damage threshold og the p4.....It is too early to tell for sure but I do see many reference they do not want to gover 1.85v which would be like a p4 user not going over 1.75v. The 1.75v has been a recognized warning area for quite some time now and it seems to limit damage to the p4's...
The main thing is actual vcore...Are those 1.95v the bios set vcore or actual idle and load vcore???
pillage2001
Lifer
He did not have a Tbred dude.
pillage2001
Lifer
The thread said Dead Tbred. 😛
ChampionAtTufshop
Platinum Member
i caught on, but was lazy and had to finish off a response trying to critically analyze one of shakespeare's sonnets lol
😉
I think most people stop at 1.85V b/c thats what most BIOS limits them to w/out physical voltage mods. I'm sure its no coincidence though, as AMD and/or mobo makers realized that more than 1.85V could have adverse effects (like dead processors 🙂 ). My current board (A7N8XD) overvolts .05 exactly, and with a 480 TrueBlue, it doesn't fluctuate at all. I haven't run 1.85V (1.9V) though since I tested the headroom of the core when I first got my 2100+. I run now at 1.80V (1.85V), though I may up it again when I get my new RAM.
Chiz
ChampionAtTufshop
Platinum Member
ehh just to keep the thread up
i just got 1700+ tbred b a bit ago, and im running it in my a7v at 1.25v haha
(granted its only at 1250mhz...hehe)
but tht will change when i get new board.....and from the looks of it i wont go above 1.85ish haha
i just got 1700+ tbred b a bit ago, and im running it in my a7v at 1.25v haha
(granted its only at 1250mhz...hehe)
but tht will change when i get new board.....and from the looks of it i wont go above 1.85ish haha
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 24K
-
-
