Originally posted by: nismotigerwvu
What you are saying is that when I said "someone's opinion is not always a fact" it was just an opinion and not a fact.
This implies that you feel opinions are always facts.
In my opinion you're just an antisocial moron with nothing better to do than threadcap and added nothing to conversation.
By your logic, this must be true.
I'll rise to your bad logic, and raise you some good logic.
We will start with the simplist. I gave only one opionion.
What you are saying is that when I said "someone's opinion is not always a fact" it was just an opinion and not a fact.
This implies that you feel opinions are always facts.
Now, let us consider this for a moment. How exactly does his statement imply what he believes? Unless you can back up with some evidence, then you can not declaratively state that he was referencing your 'someone's opinion is not always a fact' statement, nor can you say that even if he was that he believes that statement to be false.
It appears that while writing that statement you might have realized that the logic of the argument was over your head and decided to resort to name calling. That says way more about your intellectually credibility then any ethical dilemma surrounding my use of declarative statements ever could. Giving up any semblance of an argument and resorting to name calling really is the depths of intellectual uselessness.
And you call me out for posting opinion, but you do not bother to rebut my opinion, nor even to point out what you believe to be opinion, and to top it off you claim that I somehow declared myself a authority as ?the mature voice of reason? which can be nothing but your opinion.
So, basically you yourself posted a bunch of opinions which, which you disguise as facts, and that have nothing to do with the topic, and when someone questioned you on it you instead of defending your postion simply become insulting.
I'm the one that should be ignored?