Originally posted by: Don Vito Corleone
I voted for Coleman but am deeply ambivalent about the whole thing. Frankly I wish we had provisions for a runoff, because no matter how this plays out it will be a rather suspect election.
Originally posted by: Lemon law
In terms of a run off election to settle the Minnesota race, get over it, that is not the way the Minnesota State Constitution was written long before any of were born.
As for any charges Franken is stealing the election, its seems to me that those charges should be either shown to be true, or its just more FUD. This free floating
GOP doubt is just bullshit given the scrutiny this election is receiving.
Originally posted by: Lemon law
In terms of a run off election to settle the Minnesota race, get over it, that is not the way the Minnesota State Constitution was written long before any of were born.
As for any charges Franken is stealing the election, its seems to me that those charges should be either shown to be true, or its just more FUD. This free floating
GOP doubt is just bullshit given the scrutiny this election is receiving.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: Lemon law
In terms of a run off election to settle the Minnesota race, get over it, that is not the way the Minnesota State Constitution was written long before any of were born.
As for any charges Franken is stealing the election, its seems to me that those charges should be either shown to be true, or its just more FUD. This free floating
GOP doubt is just bullshit given the scrutiny this election is receiving.
How can we trust the democrat party? When left to its own devices you guys start selling political seats to the highest bidder.
Originally posted by: Lemon law
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: Lemon law
In terms of a run off election to settle the Minnesota race, get over it, that is not the way the Minnesota State Constitution was written long before any of were born.
As for any charges Franken is stealing the election, its seems to me that those charges should be either shown to be true, or its just more FUD. This free floating
GOP doubt is just bullshit given the scrutiny this election is receiving.
How can we trust the democrat party? When left to its own devices you guys start selling political seats to the highest bidder.
How can we trust the GOP, left to their own devices, those guys start wars based on packs of lies, are totally inept in running anything, and they ended up bankrupting the entire country while running up huge deficits.
How quick the republirats are to condemn Blogojevich, the guy is not even indicted yet, but after the fact of conviction, GWB has already issued a pardon to Scooter Fibby and God only knows how many international war criminals and domestic crooks GWB will pardon before he slinks out of office in less than 30 days.
Not saying the dems are total angels either, but just in terms of recent corruption, for every democrat convicted, something like 30 republirats are already in jail and another 60 should be jailed.
Originally posted by: Genx87
btw since you dont live in MN please kindly stfu about a runoff wish. Don Vito and I unlike you actually live in this wonderful state. Apparently we both agree a runoff is a better option than this courtroom drama.
Originally posted by: Lemon law
Well Genx, if you believe there is some special validity to the fact that "Don Vito and I unlike you actually live in this wonderful state. Apparently we both agree a runoff is a better option than this courtroom drama.", then you both had your chance to change the State constitution before the fact. Meanwhile you have to follow what the State Constitution says is the mandated process. So quit your bitching but meanwhile you two can help in any efforts to amend the Minnesota constitution so you can have a runoff election next time issues like this arise.
But you get no argument from me on the wonders of Minnesota, I was born there, and still own some property there.
But if you wish for some more more recent repubs, try Cunningham, Ken lay, Tom Delay, Ney, Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney Scooter Libby, Wolfawotz, Feith, Boehner, Gonzales, GWB, Ex Gov. of Illinois Ryan, and that is just a partial list. And when the dems get into executive branch files, I have little doubt your 180 will be better identified. And besides, your listing of Rangel is dubious at best. Taking a different interpretation than the IRS is not a crime, and the tax is now paid. As for Jefferson and Blago, they have yet to go to trial, and in the case of both Jefferson and Blago, the evidence may be so sloppily collected that its inadmissible in a court of law. But thankfully the voters finally removed Jefferson and and Illinois democrats are moving, as we speak, to remove Blago. But getting rid of Blago may depend on the
Federal government republican officials being willing to share the evidence.
Originally posted by: Lemon law
Well Genx, if you believe there is some special validity to the fact that "Don Vito and I unlike you actually live in this wonderful state. Apparently we both agree a runoff is a better option than this courtroom drama.", then you both had your chance to change the State constitution before the fact. Meanwhile you have to follow what the State Constitution says is the mandated process. So quit your bitching but meanwhile you two can help in any efforts to amend the Minnesota constitution so you can have a runoff election next time issues like this arise.
But you get no argument from me on the wonders of Minnesota, I was born there, and still own some property there.
But if you wish for some more more recent repubs, try Cunningham, Ken lay, Tom Delay, Ney, Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney Scooter Libby, Wolfawotz, Feith, Boehner, Gonzales, GWB, Ex Gov. of Illinois Ryan, and that is just a partial list. And when the dems get into executive branch files, I have little doubt your 180 will be better identified. And besides, your listing of Rangel is dubious at best. Taking a different interpretation than the IRS is not a crime, and the tax is now paid. As for Jefferson and Blago, they have yet to go to trial, and in the case of both Jefferson and Blago, the evidence may be so sloppily collected that its inadmissible in a court of law. But thankfully the voters finally removed Jefferson and and Illinois democrats are moving, as we speak, to remove Blago. But getting rid of Blago may depend on the
Federal government republican officials being willing to share the evidence.
