DC Madam scandal update: Larry Flynt on Larry King - Whittled list from 300 to 30 solid leads, including another senator

[Phokus]

KING: Does that mean you have phone numbers that you're following up?

FLYNT: Not just phone numbers.

KING: Names?

FLYNT: We've got good leads. We've got over 300 initially. And they're down to about 30 now which is solid.

KING: When are you going to print?

FLYNT: Well, the last thing now is we don't know if we want to let it to drip, drip, drip or we want to go with everything at once.

KING: You mean you might release 30 names at once?

FLYNT: A good possibility.

KING: Will we be -- I don't want to get into names yet. Will we be shocked?

FLYNT: Yes.

KING: Were you shocked?

FLYNT: I was shocked, especially at one senator but...

KING: One senator especially?

FLYNT: Yes.

Anyone want to put wagers on who this senator is? If Flynt was 'shocked', then it has to be another moralizing asshat. Trent Lott maybe? If Rick Santorum were still a senator i woulda guessed him right away.

 

[BrunoPuntzJones]

He better release all 30 at once. I'm sure dribbling could lead to a "heart attack".

 

[Moonbeam]

Dribbling? Come on!

 

[Whoozyerdaddy]

It'd be nice if he weren't just digging for Republicans. I want them allllll... 😉

 

[jonks]

He should have his Hustler Honey's walk around DC naked with the names of the guilty written on them.

 

[Whoozyerdaddy]

Originally posted by: sirjonk
He should have his Hustler Honey's walk around DC naked with the names of the guilty written on them.

I would like to suscribe to your news letter.

 

[theeedude]

Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
It'd be nice if he weren't just digging for Republicans. I want them allllll... 😉

Flynt said he will expose hypocrites who preach "morals" while practice "sin."
Anyways, we should have ATPN Pool as to who the next lucky Senator is. I nominate Chambliss.

 

[Lemon law]

God works in mysterious ways.

And so does Larry Flynt.

And when either decides to lay it on us, it will be laid on and not before. Be patient while the victims dangle slowly slowly in the wind.

Diogenes is still looking for an honest man---but finding hypocrites is like shooting ducks in the water.---but the more highly self inflated they are---the louder the noise they make when they deflate.

 

[Whoozyerdaddy]

Originally posted by: senseamp

Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
It'd be nice if he weren't just digging for Republicans. I want them allllll... 😉

Flynt said he will expose hypocrites who preach "morals" while practice "sin."
Anyways, we should have ATPN Pool as to who the next lucky Senator is. I nominate Chambliss.

Which was his thinly veiled way of saying he's giving Ds a pass and going after Rs. I approve of what he's doing, I just wish he would do it equally to everyone.

 

[theeedude]

Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy

Originally posted by: senseamp

Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
It'd be nice if he weren't just digging for Republicans. I want them allllll... 😉

Flynt said he will expose hypocrites who preach "morals" while practice "sin."
Anyways, we should have ATPN Pool as to who the next lucky Senator is. I nominate Chambliss.

Which was his thinly veiled way of saying he's giving Ds a pass and going after Rs. I approve of what he's doing, I just wish he would do it equally to everyone.

Well, if Republicans want to preach "family values" to the rest of us, they should pay the price for not practicing what they preach. If there is a Democrat doing same, they should be exposed too, though Democrat voters don't really care as much about this stuff, so they wouldn't be effected as much. Look at Bill Clinton, he's still wildly popular among Democrats.

 

[CanOWorms]

I think the one senator will be Hillary Clinton.

 

[jonks]

Originally posted by: senseamp

Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy

Originally posted by: senseamp

Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
It'd be nice if he weren't just digging for Republicans. I want them allllll... 😉

Flynt said he will expose hypocrites who preach "morals" while practice "sin."
Anyways, we should have ATPN Pool as to who the next lucky Senator is. I nominate Chambliss.

Which was his thinly veiled way of saying he's giving Ds a pass and going after Rs. I approve of what he's doing, I just wish he would do it equally to everyone.

Well, if Republicans want to preach "family values" to the rest of us, they should pay the price for not practicing what they preach. If there is a Democrat doing same, they should be exposed too, though Democrat voters don't really care as much about this stuff, so they wouldn't be effected as much. Look at Bill Clinton, he's still wildly popular among Democrats.

Ditto.

 

[Don Vito Corleone]

Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy

Originally posted by: senseamp

Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
It'd be nice if he weren't just digging for Republicans. I want them allllll... 😉

Flynt said he will expose hypocrites who preach "morals" while practice "sin."
Anyways, we should have ATPN Pool as to who the next lucky Senator is. I nominate Chambliss.

Which was his thinly veiled way of saying he's giving Ds a pass and going after Rs. I approve of what he's doing, I just wish he would do it equally to everyone.

Presumably there's nothing stopping Newsmax or Fox News from doing the same thing Flynt is, but targeting the Ds involved.

 

[blackangst1]

Except for the staunch religious (on either side of the aisle) Im wondering if this really matters? Im a Christian, and although it's not MY lifestyle choice, I really couldnt care less.

 

[Whoozyerdaddy]

Originally posted by: senseamp

Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy

Originally posted by: senseamp

Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
It'd be nice if he weren't just digging for Republicans. I want them allllll... 😉

Flynt said he will expose hypocrites who preach "morals" while practice "sin."
Anyways, we should have ATPN Pool as to who the next lucky Senator is. I nominate Chambliss.

Which was his thinly veiled way of saying he's giving Ds a pass and going after Rs. I approve of what he's doing, I just wish he would do it equally to everyone.

Well, if Republicans want to preach "family values" to the rest of us, they should pay the price for not practicing what they preach. If there is a Democrat doing same, they should be exposed too, though Democrat voters don't really care as much about this stuff, so they wouldn't be effected as much. Look at Bill Clinton, he's still wildly popular among Democrats.

You guys always throw that out. I don't understand why that matters. How is a guy any less of a creep when he cheats on his family with a hooker just because he doesn't use the phrase "family values" in his stump speech? How is it that they get let off the hook in your eyes because they choose a different catch phrase?

If a married man is seeing a prostitute what does that say about his character? He violates a very simple promise and puts the health of his spouse in danger at the same time. Sounds like another classic case of say one thing and do another (and if I hurt you along the way, screw you) if you ask me.

So, is that the only reason you are giving the dems a pass here? What about an R who never uttered the words "family values"? Please tell me you can do better than that weaksauce.

Personally I don't care what party they are from. I don't excuse or condemn their actions over a catch phrase they may or may not have uttered at one time or another. Moral relevency anyone?

 

[Phokus]

Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy

Originally posted by: senseamp

Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy

Originally posted by: senseamp

Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
It'd be nice if he weren't just digging for Republicans. I want them allllll... 😉

Flynt said he will expose hypocrites who preach "morals" while practice "sin."
Anyways, we should have ATPN Pool as to who the next lucky Senator is. I nominate Chambliss.

Which was his thinly veiled way of saying he's giving Ds a pass and going after Rs. I approve of what he's doing, I just wish he would do it equally to everyone.

Well, if Republicans want to preach "family values" to the rest of us, they should pay the price for not practicing what they preach. If there is a Democrat doing same, they should be exposed too, though Democrat voters don't really care as much about this stuff, so they wouldn't be effected as much. Look at Bill Clinton, he's still wildly popular among Democrats.

You guys always throw that out. I don't understand why that matters. How is a guy any less of a creep when he cheats on his family with a hooker just because he doesn't use the phrase "family values" in his stump speech? How is it that they get let off the hook in your eyes because they choose a different catch phrase?

If a married man is seeing a prostitute what does that say about his character? He violates a very simple promise and puts the health of his spouse in danger at the same time. Sounds like another classic case of say one thing and do another (and if I hurt you along the way, screw you) if you ask me.

So, is that the only reason you are giving the dems a pass here? What about an R who never uttered the words "family values"? Please tell me you can do better than that weaksauce.

Personally I don't care what party they are from. I don't excuse or condemn their actions over a catch phrase they may or may not have uttered at one time or another. Moral relevency anyone?

I partially agree with you. However, that's a violation of trust between the Senator and his wife and that's a private matter. What angers me though is when that politician publicly demonizes the activities that i or other people engage in privately and pushes to have legislation that controls what i do in my own bedroom while engaging in the same activity or worse. Also, i fully endorse Flynt or anyone else going after Dems who do the same stuff (i'm sure there are lots of southern democrats who do to appeal to their bible thumping base).

 

[bamacre]

Originally posted by: CanOWorms
I think the one senator will be Hillary Clinton.

I would laugh for weeks.

 

[1EZduzit]

Originally posted by: senseamp

Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
It'd be nice if he weren't just digging for Republicans. I want them allllll... 😉

Flynt said he will expose hypocrites who preach "morals" while practice "sin."
Anyways, we should have ATPN Pool as to who the next lucky Senator is. I nominate Chambliss.

I just hope he gets a couple of politicians that were pulling all stops to get Clinton. That would be some poetic justice.

 

[UberNeuman]

I'd bet on Fred. He looks like a horny dude.

 

[bamacre]

Originally posted by: 1EZduzit

Originally posted by: senseamp

Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
It'd be nice if he weren't just digging for Republicans. I want them allllll... 😉

Flynt said he will expose hypocrites who preach "morals" while practice "sin."
Anyways, we should have ATPN Pool as to who the next lucky Senator is. I nominate Chambliss.

I just hope he gets a couple of politicians that were pulling all stops to get Clinton. That would be some poetic justice.

Why? Completely different situation.

 

[1EZduzit]

Originally posted by: bamacre

Originally posted by: 1EZduzit

Originally posted by: senseamp

Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
It'd be nice if he weren't just digging for Republicans. I want them allllll... 😉

Flynt said he will expose hypocrites who preach "morals" while practice "sin."
Anyways, we should have ATPN Pool as to who the next lucky Senator is. I nominate Chambliss.

I just hope he gets a couple of politicians that were pulling all stops to get Clinton. That would be some poetic justice.

Why? Completely different situation.

If they find a congressman who was having sex outside marrage and at the same time was condeming Clinton for doing the same thing, that would be poetic justice in my book.

 

[smack Down]

Originally posted by: bamacre

Originally posted by: 1EZduzit

Originally posted by: senseamp

Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
It'd be nice if he weren't just digging for Republicans. I want them allllll... 😉

Flynt said he will expose hypocrites who preach "morals" while practice "sin."
Anyways, we should have ATPN Pool as to who the next lucky Senator is. I nominate Chambliss.

I just hope he gets a couple of politicians that were pulling all stops to get Clinton. That would be some poetic justice.

Why? Completely different situation.

It is pretty much identical,

 

[bamacre]

Originally posted by: 1EZduzit

Originally posted by: bamacre

Originally posted by: 1EZduzit

Originally posted by: senseamp

Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
It'd be nice if he weren't just digging for Republicans. I want them allllll... 😉

Flynt said he will expose hypocrites who preach "morals" while practice "sin."
Anyways, we should have ATPN Pool as to who the next lucky Senator is. I nominate Chambliss.

I just hope he gets a couple of politicians that were pulling all stops to get Clinton. That would be some poetic justice.

Why? Completely different situation.

If they find a congressman who was having sex outside marrage and at the same time was condeming Clinton for doing the same thing, that would be poetic justice in my book.

Wow. I guess you think Clinton was impeached for having sex outside his marriage? :roll:

 

[Oceandevi]

Originally posted by: bamacre

Originally posted by: 1EZduzit

Originally posted by: bamacre

Originally posted by: 1EZduzit

Originally posted by: senseamp

Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
It'd be nice if he weren't just digging for Republicans. I want them allllll... 😉

Flynt said he will expose hypocrites who preach "morals" while practice "sin."
Anyways, we should have ATPN Pool as to who the next lucky Senator is. I nominate Chambliss.

I just hope he gets a couple of politicians that were pulling all stops to get Clinton. That would be some poetic justice.

Why? Completely different situation.

If they find a congressman who was having sex outside marrage and at the same time was condeming Clinton for doing the same thing, that would be poetic justice in my book.

Wow. I guess you think Clinton was impeached for having sex outside his marriage? :roll:

I don't think thats what he is talking about. 😕

 

[1EZduzit]

Originally posted by: bamacre

Originally posted by: 1EZduzit

Originally posted by: bamacre

Originally posted by: 1EZduzit

Originally posted by: senseamp

Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
It'd be nice if he weren't just digging for Republicans. I want them allllll... 😉

Flynt said he will expose hypocrites who preach "morals" while practice "sin."
Anyways, we should have ATPN Pool as to who the next lucky Senator is. I nominate Chambliss.

I just hope he gets a couple of politicians that were pulling all stops to get Clinton. That would be some poetic justice.

Why? Completely different situation.

If they find a congressman who was having sex outside marrage and at the same time was condeming Clinton for doing the same thing, that would be poetic justice in my book.

Wow. I guess you think Clinton was impeached for having sex outside his marriage? :roll:

No, I think it wasn't their business what he was doing and if someone who was supporting the investigation into Clinton's PRIVATE sex life now has it announced to the world that he was doing the same thing and maybe even at the very same time he was going after Clinton that it would be POETIC JUSTICE.

If I could, I'd that individual on the stand, under oath, and make him squirm. I hate hypocrits, especially moral hypocrits because it shows who really has the bankrupt moral character.