Krazy4Real
Lifer
- Oct 3, 2003
- 12,221
- 55
- 91
This. There is no way he will get that kind of money.he's got plenty of room to negotiate down with at least
This. There is no way he will get that kind of money.he's got plenty of room to negotiate down with at least
The rich just want to get richer. That's like your company asking you to chip in for the lease on their office space. And that office was partly paid for by taxpayer funds (in most cases).
Reinventing the wheel? The M, MM, MMM system is based off of Roman numerals and therefore has been around a LOT longer than your system. Yours is the one that reinvented the wheel.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=roman+numberals
Pretentious people like to think they are using an older method of counting.
NY Jet fan here, read this this morning for a NY newspaper:
A story from the National Football Post's Mike Lombardi reported that Jets cornerback Darrelle Revis is seeking a new contract that will pay him an average of $20 million per year.
Contacted by The Post yesterday, Revis' agents, Neil Schwartz and Jonathan Feinsod, vehemently shot the report down as preposterous, wondering aloud where that information could have come from.
"We have never spoken to Mike Lombardi -- ever, not even when he worked for the Raiders," Feinsod told The Post. "Where he's getting his information I don't know, but it's not coming from our side."
It certainly isn't coming from the Jets' side, either. After all, why would someone from the Jets leak that Revis was seeking such big money?
Revis, scheduled to make $1 million this season, the fourth year of his original contract, is seeking a new deal and he is on record as saying that Jets general manager Mike Tannenbaum promised him a new one before the 2010 season begins.
"Roman Numberals?" I believe you mean to say "Numerals."
I love how both sides play innocent. Agents leak ridiculous numbers like this all the time. When/if the Jets sign Revis for a "mere" $15M per year, it appears that they got a bargain in comparison.Umm, to villify Revis, cause a public backlash, and force his contract demands lower? I don't think that this is the case, but let's not pretend that there wouldn't be a good reason for the Jets to release this.
When Ilya Kovalchuk was demanding >$120 million from the Atlanta Thrashers they went public with it for the same reason.
Reinventing the wheel? The M, MM, MMM system is based off of Roman numerals and therefore has been around a LOT longer than your system. Yours is the one that reinvented the wheel.
NY Jet fan here, read this this morning for a NY newspaper:
A story from the National Football Post's Mike Lombardi reported that Jets cornerback Darrelle Revis is seeking a new contract that will pay him an average of $20 million per year.
Contacted by The Post yesterday, Revis' agents, Neil Schwartz and Jonathan Feinsod, vehemently shot the report down as preposterous, wondering aloud where that information could have come from.
"We have never spoken to Mike Lombardi -- ever, not even when he worked for the Raiders," Feinsod told The Post. "Where he's getting his information I don't know, but it's not coming from our side."
It certainly isn't coming from the Jets' side, either. After all, why would someone from the Jets leak that Revis was seeking such big money?
Revis, scheduled to make $1 million this season, the fourth year of his original contract, is seeking a new deal and he is on record as saying that Jets general manager Mike Tannenbaum promised him a new one before the 2010 season begins.
