Damn. Lost another 31 more Marines.

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

amol

Lifer
Jul 8, 2001
11,680
3
81
even though i oppose the war, i try my best to support the troops

i dont go around saying, "wrong war, wrong time, wrong place" because i know that that's not helping the troops

they should finish what they're doing, otherwise, all those deaths would be for nothing
 

BigFatCow

Diamond Member
Aug 11, 2001
3,373
1
0
:( so sad. They said it was the deadliest day in Iraq, besides the 30 Marines and 1 sailor on the helicopter 6 other troops died in an ambush.
 
May 16, 2000
13,522
0
0
Originally posted by: DJFuji
Originally posted by: manly
Welcome to ATOT, Mr. Vice President. Please continue your good work proving to America Saddam was directly involved in 9/11.

Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
I don't see any bs, except coming from you.


Good counter arguments, both of you.

On the other hand, I dont really want to hear the politically-laden arguments here in ATOT anyway, so it's probably better you chose to resort to ridicule over critical thinking.


Originally posted by: PrinceofWands

Some do, some don't. I know many people who are currently over, or have been over. Only two are staying with the military after this (both because they're career men and don't want to have to start over in civilian life). About half seem to feel there's reasonable support for the action. About 80% feel the government has handled things terribly and didn't even vote for Bush in this last election (which is pretty amazing given how hard the military pushes voting for the incumbent). You should probably seperate marines from the other branches...I've known tons of people from all 4 branches and marines are...well...different.

Not to overuse a cliche example, but...while they were winning most German soldiers fully believed in what they were doing too. The VC STRONGLY believed in what they were doing. Kids believe in Santa Clause. Many rational adults believe in all sorts of paranormal phenomenon...NONE of that makes any of it true. Believing in something doesn't make it right.

Having been in I can tell you no where near everyone agrees with what goes on in the military. For the largest percentage they're there because they want money for college, or something to do for a while to pad the ol resume, or other mundane aspects. Many are just fulfilling what they see as a civil obligation to repay citizenship (that's why I was there btw). I'm sure others had other experiences, not saying mine are the be-all end-all.

80% of the military members you know dont agree with the war?? I guess we know some very different people then. You're right, Marines are a different breed, so perhaps I was mistaken in grouping all servicemembers together.

What I don't get is how so people can criticize our government the way an "also-ran" who never made the varsity basketball squaed in high school can criticize the performance of NBA players. It strikes me as being intensely arrogant for a regular civilian to think that he or she knows how to run the country and foreign affairs better than our own government. In fact, it's even worse because the CinC and top brass are privy to intelligence the average citizen is not. It pisses me off everytime i hear someone say "we should pull out of iraq" -- not because theyre necessarily wrong -- but because of the arrogance needed to make such a statement. I don't know for sure whether or not we're doing everything "right" in iraq, but what I DO know is that I'm in NO position to make criticisms. If the government thinks what we're doing is worthwhile, the CinC thinks so, and the majority of the troops think so, why am I going to believe joe schmoe over there who is protesting against something he doesn't understand?


Whoa whoa whoa whoa there kemosabe...I think you have some skewed views of government. The American government was designed to get us away from having a ruling class in charge of everything. It was designed to be a direct representation of the collective wills and whims of the people. It was created to be a funnel through which the masses poured their intentions. It was NOT designed to reign over us, or down upon us. There is a fundamental split in politics, always has been, between the concept of an elitist democracy or a democracy of the people. In the first, it is assumed that some people are better than others...have more right to rule. In the other, a position in government is a job you hold in place of a number of other people. The first group does what they think is right. The second group does what the people tell them to do. We were SUPPOSED to work towards the second type, but regretably we never outgrew the first.

A politician is NOT special, they are NOT super citizens. They aren't more intelligent, they aren't wiser, they sure as hell aren't more moral than the rest of us. What makes a politician today is basically two things: personality and money. They have the desire to be in charge and they have the money to make it happen. Those are the people that should lead LAST. There's an old saying, give the power to the man who wants it least, and it will be abused the least. Give it to the one who wants it most, and it will be abused the most. Politicians try to be elected, therefore they should never be. You say they have access to secret information? Why do you think that is? Could it be that they know that the only way to maintain their elite status is make themselves important? Why are laws so crazy convuluted? Simple, they were written by legislators who were once lawyers and/or judges. Think about it this way...you get rich from being a lawyer, you want your kids to have great things, so you know you'll push them towards law. You want them to be needed, so when you become a congressman you write laws that only a lawyer can understand. Furthermore you want to protect what you have, so you help the rich whenever possible. Ok, it's not QUITE that simple, but very close to. My point is that you can't say that what makes the politicians special is there access to information, because THEY are the ones who keep that information restricted only to them. It's like voting yourself a raise.

To suggest that the politicians 'understand' anything is vastly overstating their abilities. If you honestly believe they're better than you or me, then I pity you deeply. You are under no obligation to turn your freedoms and will over to a governing body. That is NOT the American way. If you don't understand that for the most part the elites are interested most in keeping elites elite, then you have utterly failed to receive any kind of proper education. I'm not going to go fully into it, but there's simply no question of Americas path over the last 20 years especially. You can choose to surrender your life to them, but you can NOT make that choice for others.

You don't have to believe joe schmo either...THAT's why this is America. You are free to go out and learn about things and make your own judgement. But remember this: the elites that run this country are rich and powerful. They care about other elites. joe schmo is average joe, that cares mostly about people just like him. If you don't understand that, then you have a very naive view of the world. I'd suggest you study sociology, economics, history, political science, and psychology as a start. There's a reason why the more educated you are the more likely you are to be a liberal (I'm talking about a broad liberal eduation btw, not a freaking mba or other degree that avoids any concept of thinking or learning). You cannot learn about the history of the world, about the forces at work within it, without coming to understand what I'm talking about.

Now I'm sorry you have such a low opinion of yourself and other citizens that you think they're inferior to politicians or incapable of making judgements, but that's your right. Just don't take away my right to feel differently about it. You are an American citizen, you have a RIGHT to voice your opinion, and demand representation in your government. Moreover, it's my personal opinion that all Americans have a responsiblity to remain true to the values this country was founded on, and NOT the government which represents it. That was the oath I took, to defend the constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. If a politician threatens the constitutional basis of this nation then he BECOMES a domestic enemy. If you're so all fired up about defeating the enemies of America, then why don't you stand against the ones already in our country? If you honestly don't believe you're intelligent enough or capable enough to make such a decision, then at least step aside for those of us who are.

btw, yes, most of the military people I know are against the war.
 
May 16, 2000
13,522
0
0
BTW, I want to make it clear that I oppose sudden withdrawl from Iraq, that would have no positive effect in the long term. But I sure as hell will NOT support any further action by this regime unless we are DIRECTLY ATTACKED first.
 

DJFuji

Diamond Member
Oct 18, 1999
3,643
1
76
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands

Whoa whoa whoa whoa there kemosabe...I think you have some skewed views of government. The American government was designed to get us away from having a ruling class in charge of everything. It was designed to be a direct representation of the collective wills and whims of the people. It was created to be a funnel through which the masses poured their intentions. It was NOT designed to reign over us, or down upon us. There is a fundamental split in politics, always has been, between the concept of an elitist democracy or a democracy of the people. In the first, it is assumed that some people are better than others...have more right to rule. In the other, a position in government is a job you hold in place of a number of other people. The first group does what they think is right. The second group does what the people tell them to do. We were SUPPOSED to work towards the second type, but regretably we never outgrew the first.

A politician is NOT special, they are NOT super citizens. They aren't more intelligent, they aren't wiser, they sure as hell aren't more moral than the rest of us. What makes a politician today is basically two things: personality and money. They have the desire to be in charge and they have the money to make it happen. Those are the people that should lead LAST. There's an old saying, give the power to the man who wants it least, and it will be abused the least. Give it to the one who wants it most, and it will be abused the most. Politicians try to be elected, therefore they should never be. You say they have access to secret information? Why do you think that is? Could it be that they know that the only way to maintain their elite status is make themselves important? Why are laws so crazy convuluted? Simple, they were written by legislators who were once lawyers and/or judges. Think about it this way...you get rich from being a lawyer, you want your kids to have great things, so you know you'll push them towards law. You want them to be needed, so when you become a congressman you write laws that only a lawyer can understand. Furthermore you want to protect what you have, so you help the rich whenever possible. Ok, it's not QUITE that simple, but very close to. My point is that you can't say that what makes the politicians special is there access to information, because THEY are the ones who keep that information restricted only to them. It's like voting yourself a raise.

To suggest that the politicians 'understand' anything is vastly overstating their abilities. If you honestly believe they're better than you or me, then I pity you deeply. You are under no obligation to turn your freedoms and will over to a governing body. That is NOT the American way. If you don't understand that for the most part the elites are interested most in keeping elites elite, then you have utterly failed to receive any kind of proper education. I'm not going to go fully into it, but there's simply no question of Americas path over the last 20 years especially. You can choose to surrender your life to them, but you can NOT make that choice for others.

You don't have to believe joe schmo either...THAT's why this is America. You are free to go out and learn about things and make your own judgement. But remember this: the elites that run this country are rich and powerful. They care about other elites. joe schmo is average joe, that cares mostly about people just like him. If you don't understand that, then you have a very naive view of the world. I'd suggest you study sociology, economics, history, political science, and psychology as a start. There's a reason why the more educated you are the more likely you are to be a liberal (I'm talking about a broad liberal eduation btw, not a freaking mba or other degree that avoids any concept of thinking or learning). You cannot learn about the history of the world, about the forces at work within it, without coming to understand what I'm talking about.

Now I'm sorry you have such a low opinion of yourself and other citizens that you think they're inferior to politicians or incapable of making judgements, but that's your right. Just don't take away my right to feel differently about it. You are an American citizen, you have a RIGHT to voice your opinion, and demand representation in your government. Moreover, it's my personal opinion that all Americans have a responsiblity to remain true to the values this country was founded on, and NOT the government which represents it. That was the oath I took, to defend the constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. If a politician threatens the constitutional basis of this nation then he BECOMES a domestic enemy. If you're so all fired up about defeating the enemies of America, then why don't you stand against the ones already in our country? If you honestly don't believe you're intelligent enough or capable enough to make such a decision, then at least step aside for those of us who are.

btw, yes, most of the military people I know are against the war.

I almost didn?t respond to this because your post was so damned long but you obviously put a lot of effort into this so the least I could do is respond with my thoughts.

I think you?re misinterpreting what I?m saying. I also don?t appreciate the condescending tone you took in your response. Maybe you think I?m another ?stupid Marine? or perhaps you just assumed I am less educated than you. In either case, I don?t appreciate it and I don?t believe myself to be ?below? politicians or anyone else for that matter. In fact, aside from the CinC, I never even mentioned politicians. I simply said that it is arrogant for the average American to think that they know more than the Generals at the Pentagon do. And I don?t believe that the government should rule with an iron fist and without representing the voice of the people. You somehow got off on a very strange tangent on how I think politicians are special and I?m inferior to them. That?s not the case at all.

My original point (and ONLY point) was that it?s annoying to hear every Joe Schmoe on the street talk like he?s suddenly the resident expert on war and foreign policy. IMO, VERY few Americans have done enough reading, research, and have enough real world experience to know what they?re talking about when criticizing the government. Most are just spewing BS that they?ve heard from friends, CNN, or the local liberal war protester. And THAT?S what pisses me off. The self-proclaimed experts running around ?informing? me that the Iraq war is all wrong and that we should have done this and that differently. Do you go to a doctor, get his professional opinion, and then listen to the guy walking down the street who tells you that the medical community is all wrong and that he has all the answers they don?t want you to know? Why don?t you listen to him? The medical community isn?t made of people that are ?better? than you, right? Why trust them blindly? Isn?t America the land of the free where you can make your own opinion without having it forced onto you by some silly guy with an M.D. behind his name? And don?t tell me the medical community isn?t as self-serving as the top rung of the federal government.

You?re right, I don?t have to believe joe schmoe, but it?s STILL ANNOYING TO HEAR HIS BULLSH!T EVERY DAY. Oh yeah, they can make judgments all they want. They can run around at their silly war protests and talk about how they would dodge the draft if it came and how the government is the worst government in the world and how we?d all be better off moving to Canada. I?m not saying they shouldn?t be allowed to make such judgments, I?m saying it?s arrogant and annoying.

Like I mentioned in the analogy, it?s annoying in the same way that its annoying to hear fat middle aged guys who were never athletes in high school (or any other time frame) criticize the local NBA team and suggest ?what they SHOULD have done instead.? Maybe you?re not annoyed by arrogant, back seat drivers, but I am and that?s all I?m saying. Stop reading so much into it.

 

MikeMike

Lifer
Feb 6, 2000
45,885
66
91
/me points to the forums, discovers forum named P&N.

/me looks at OT.

/me discovers P&N flamewar going on.

/me scratches head.

/me runs quickly

MIKE
 

DJFuji

Diamond Member
Oct 18, 1999
3,643
1
76
Originally posted by: nourdmrolNMT1
/me points to the forums, discovers forum named P&N.

/me looks at OT.

/me discovers P&N flamewar going on.

/me scratches head.

/me runs quickly

MIKE

You're right, you're right. I just didn't want to ever have to venture into that hellhole. I'll stop.
 

SP33Demon

Lifer
Jun 22, 2001
27,928
142
106
Originally posted by: DJFuji
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Originally posted by: DJFuji
Originally posted by: Insane3D
Originally posted by: TallBill
Originally posted by: mrrman
it will never end unless all the troups are pulled out...people will be killed in some form or an other

I think in an average month more military members die in the US then they do overseas including Iraq.

That makes NO sense. We lose more guys over here where they are not fighting anyone than in a warzone where there are people constantly trying to kill them?

Sounds like one of those things you thought sounded good...

Ok... i originally wrote a very scathing reply about why you shouldn't talk about things you probably know very little about...but i decided to be a little more civilized for a change. =)

The sad truth is that on average, we lose as many or more servicemen and women to accidents than to hostile engagements. Of course it makes sense. Do more people in the U.S. die from murder than from car accidents?
Maybe on average you lose more, but if you specifically compared the casualties of this war to any "accident", well it doesn't take Einstein to come to a conclusion.

My heart goes out to the 31 soldier's families. Hopefully this bullsht will be over soon.

How are you going to compare a whole war against one accident? TallBill's original point was there there were just as many casualties, if not more, ON AVERAGE. Of course the entire war had more casualties than a single accident. Just like the total number of civilians dying from accidents in the US is greater than the number of servicemen that died in the war. Changing critical points in the scenario nullifies the validity of the argument.
Um, usually averages are drawn by years. Please tell me you're kidding if you think that there have been more "accidental" deaths in the military over a one year span vs hostile casualties in the Iraq war.

 
May 16, 2000
13,522
0
0
Originally posted by: DJFuji
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands

btw, yes, most of the military people I know are against the war.

I almost didn?t respond to this because your post was so damned long but you obviously put a lot of effort into this so the least I could do is respond with my thoughts.

Fair enough, apologies for my tone...it was 3am and I was enraged from a long day of studying things like this.