That sucks. And why can't I get a 5.9L V-8 in a reg. cab Dakota AWD? If you want a reg. cab short-box you can only get the 5.9L in the 2WD RT. Hmmmmmm...... a 8.0L V-10 mounted in a Dakota. That would rule!
Although it does say, <<Warning: This column is often based on rumors and information derived from unsubstantiated sources. We do not guarantee the veracity of any of the information contained in this column. The opinions expressed in this column are those of the Buzz Watcher, and do not represent those of Car & Truck News or our advertisers. Read on at your own risk. >>
True, but there articles are right 99.999% of the time They also always get the scoop (pictures, specs, etc.) on all the Chrysler cars before ANYONE else.
Umm...no. Chrysler sucks. Daimler is sweet. I still can't belive Daimler wants anything to do with Chrysler. I'm sure Daimler had little input on the mentioned Chrysler auto, if they did, the PT Cruizer would have the CLK-GTR's engine!
StickHead Chrysler rules. Their price/performannce ratio is impressive. They have the Intrepid RT, Stratus RT, Ram SST, Dakota RT, Dakota AWD with 5.9L, Viper, Prowler, and the list goes on and on... If I were buying a new vehicle the only ones I would consider would be the Dakota AWD with the 5.9L or 4.7L V-8s or an Intrepid RT!
<< Chrysler almost went bankrupt several years ago right?? What a comeback. >>
That was the ealy 80's. Iaccoca sweet talked the US Gov't into letting them borrow money. The released the minivan in '84 and paid back the Gov with interest 5 years in advance
They are still going to continue to put the New Hemi's in the trucks and get rid of the Magnum line right? Lowers HP and worst gas milage between Ford and Chevy's new motors.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.