And we're #5 on the death penalty list
China
Iran
Saudi Arabia
Iraq
USA! USA! USA!
Sudan
Yemen
Egypt
Somalia
Jordan
We're in good company.
There's money to be made (for the right people)!And we are number one, by FAR, at incarcerating people. We have more people in jail, both per capita and total, then any other nation in the world. Like 5 times more than other first world countries.
Because of reasons.Why are we supporting Saudis against the Houthis?
Why are we supporting Saudis against the Houthis?
It is in the wrong hands.They're sitting on the largest reserves of oil in the world and if we've learned anything in the last 40 years or so oil is king.
Beyond the money and the connections that flow from that you have a critical world commodity that could, if the Saudi oil was in the wrong hands, result in major world economic problems. Or at least that's the calculus...
Brian
The Sauds have almost plausible deniability for the actions of ISIS.Saw thread title and thought it was about Isis.
Now I'm in here, I'm struggling to find the difference...
The Sauds have almost plausible deniability for the actions of ISIS.
It is in the wrong hands.
Look, that region of the world has never known actual peace in at least 4000 years and out of that volatility came three of the worlds great religions. The birth and existence of these religions in a place of this violence and volatility is not a coincidence.
From Family Guy:
All right, what better place to find God than the birthplace of all of Western civilization's great religions! ...and one really mean one.
I had a feeling this is what this place would be like.
![]()
Is that Mohammad in front of a green screen? ()🙂
Cause crucifixion blends in with lethal injection perfectly, no contrast to be found. I'm not condoning either but the "dark ages" bit refers to the method not the action.And we're #5 on the death penalty list
China
Iran
Saudi Arabia
Iraq
USA! USA! USA!
Sudan
Yemen
Egypt
Somalia
Jordan
We're in good company.
They're beheading him first -- where's the fun in that?
Should it not be crucifixion first followed by beheading?
Line on the left, one cross each!
Brian
Hey, we tortured detainees, which I'm sure was in violation of some U.N charter plus other international norms. But GW Bush and Dick Cheney continue to insist there was no torture; just intimate conversations between CIA operatives and men getting nasal irrigations.You would have had to read more than the first couple sentences of the article. I know that's a pretty tough expectation though.
We are members of the U.N., right? What's the point of having a U.N. if no one follows through with what they say they'll do?
"I'm Brian and so is my wife"
Cause crucifixion blends in with lethal injection perfectly, no contrast to be found. I'm not condoning either but the "dark ages" bit refers to the method not the action.
If you'd bothered to read they're not actually crucifying the prisoner. They're giving him a quick and humane beheading and then displaying the body crucifixion style. Big difference, death from a single quick sword blow is not any more barbaric than death by lethal injection.
Yeah, having your head chopped off, ISIS style, is no more barbaric than the way we enforce the death penalty in the USA using lethal injection.
Just to be clear, are you saying the ISIS method is acceptable or are you saying lethal injection is barbaric?
Brian