Critical Race Theory Is The Left’s QAnon

[VW MAN]

Shhhh, why use facts when you can just go on FEELINGS instead?

Link us a post in this thread that you've made that is fact based in actual reality.

(betcha the cowardly nobody will ignore this)

 

[VW MAN]

And as expected the chicken-shit cowardly pussy ignored my request above. Fuck you @s0me0nesmind1! Why even post at if all you'll do is run away and hide after being challenged?

 

[shortylickens]

And as expected the chicken-shit cowardly pussy ignored my request above. Fuck you @s0me0nesmind1! Why even post at if all you'll do is run away and hide after being challenged?

I'm wondering when you are gonna figure it out.

 

[VW MAN]

I'm wondering when you are gonna figure it out.

Figured it out long long ago when I lurked and didn't post. Doesn't change anything. All dumfucks who lie like he does deserve to be confronted loudly, often and harshly. Discrediting and combating them with words, even abrasive words, making them squirm, ridiculing and mocking them is how I choose to fight them. Others wish to ignore while the asshats spread propaganda and bullshit, and that's fine for them, but not me. I will get in their faces and tell the to fuck right off every time.

 

[HomerJS]

The country was also founded on many things which do not qualify in either category. It's a false dichotomy to suggest that ideas of equality or inequality were the sole or even primary driving factors of American history.

I know that, the question is which on is CLOSEST to the truth. Shouldn't be a tough question if you are completely honest about this countries history.

 

[Zorba]

Thank you Overlords for dividing us further on race, religion, politics and sexuality. Thank you very much.

By overlords you mean Fox News, right? Since no one was talking about Critical Race Theory until they started making up bullshit about it.

 

[HomerJS]

By overlords you mean Fox News, right? Since no one was talking about Critical Race Theory until they started making up bullshit about it.

Just like nobody cared about Colin Kapernick until Trump and Fox News told people to get riled up.

Fucking lemmings and they don't even know it.

 

[woolfe9998]

I know that, the question is which on is CLOSEST to the truth. Shouldn't be a tough question if you are completely honest about this countries history.

Fine, then it was "founded on" the idea of equality, not the idea of racism. Equality was a founding ideal, even though it didn't really exist much then.

The point is that the reality was different than the founding idea. The problem I have with the 1619 project, for example, is that it makes an argument - based on no evidence - that we fought a war of independence in order to protect and preserve slavery. Which would make it a founding idea.

There is a difference between aspiration and reality, and I think the problem with CRT as it relates to US history is that it isn't content to just discuss the reality of historical racism. It wants white supremacy to be the central founding ideal of the country. I'll accept that when I see evidence.

 

[ivwshane]

Fine, then it was "founded on" the idea of equality, not the idea of racism. Equality was a founding ideal, even though it didn't really exist much then.

The point is that the reality was different than the founding idea. The problem I have with the 1619 project, for example, is that it makes an argument - based on no evidence - that we fought a war of independence in order to protect and preserve slavery. Which would make it a founding idea.

There is a difference between aspiration and reality, and I think the problem with CRT as it relates to US history is that it isn't content to just discuss the reality of historical racism. It wants white supremacy to be the central founding ideal of the country. I'll accept that when I see evidence.

Evidence? The 1619 project provides plenty of evidence, CRT exists because of that evidence. The fact that you aren’t aware of such evidence only highlights your own ignorance and in fact highlights the need for such perspectives as the 1619 project and CRT to be taught!

 

[Amol S.]

@s0me0nesmind1 is the most sexist man on earth. He thinks women should be just confined to homes, and are children making machine. No wonder no women married him.

 

[woolfe9998]

Evidence? The 1619 project provides plenty of evidence, CRT exists because of that evidence. The fact that you aren’t aware of such evidence only highlights your own ignorance and in fact highlights the need for such perspectives as the 1619 project and CRT to be taught!

I am referring to something specific. 1619 claims that the entire reason we went to war for independence was because the colonists believed that England was going to ban slavery in its colonies, and we needed independence in order to prevent that from happening. There is just one problem: there is no evidence that this was the reason we went to war. They were criticized for this by actual historians and ultimately modified their statement from saying it was the only reason we went to war to it was one of the reasons. There is no evidence for that assertion either.

 

[Viper1j]

Perfectly spot on.

"Mandatory critical race theory is not a religious establishment; in truth, it’s closer to being the left’s QAnon. Whatever it is, it is not an art, a science, or any other form of education as we know it."

Critical Race Theory Is The Left's QAnon, And It's Taxpayer-Funded

The rise of critical race theory is alarming and dangerous, but all isn't lost. Americans have never taken to being told what to think.

thefederalist.com

So now you're saying that was never slavery in this country?

The KKK never existed?

No blacks were ever lynched?

Okay, I'll listen, convince me. (This should be good).

@s0me0nesmind1 is the most sexist man on earth. He thinks women should be just confined to homes, and are children making machine. No wonder no women married him.

Married?? REALLY?

I'd be totally astounded if any woman ever got him laid.

 

[s0me0nesmind1]

@s0me0nesmind1 is the most sexist man on earth. He thinks women should be just confined to homes, and are children making machine. No wonder no women married him.

Except I am married. With 2 kids lol. Also the wife works. Sorry that your incel self can't manage in life.

Evidence? The 1619 project provides plenty of evidence, CRT exists because of that evidence. The fact that you aren’t aware of such evidence only highlights your own ignorance and in fact highlights the need for such perspectives as the 1619 project and CRT to be taught!

lol the 1619 project has been critiqued and invalidated by many many many reputable sources and historians. It's a joke at this point.

The author is an absolute giant massive fucking moron - and idiots are propping her up out of pure stupidity.

Opinion | The ‘1619 Project’ Gets Schooled

The New York Times tries to rewrite U.S. history, but its falsehoods are exposed by surprising sources.

www.wsj.com

 

[ivwshane]

I am referring to something specific. 1619 claims that the entire reason we went to war for independence was because the colonists believed that England was going to ban slavery in its colonies, and we needed independence in order to prevent that from happening. There is just one problem: there is no evidence that this was the reason we went to war. They were criticized for this by actual historians and ultimately modified their statement from saying it was the only reason we went to war to it was one of the reasons. There is no evidence for that assertion either.

Yes, at the very least the founding fathers swept slavery under the rug. Their cowardice not only continues to haunt us but it appears that that cowardice is about as American as Apple pie.

 

[s0me0nesmind1]

So now you're saying that was never slavery in this country?

The KKK never existed?

No blacks were ever lynched?

Okay, I'll listen, convince me. (This should be good).
View attachment 48455



Married?? REALLY?

I'd be totally astounded if any woman ever got him laid.

Classic arguments of a 2 year old that simply moves the goal posts to create your own strawmen.

"I don't believe in Critical Race Theory"

"SO! You don't believe slavery happened?!"


Acting like the children we all knew you were.

 

[himkhan]

Except I am married. With 2 kids lol. Also the wife works. Sorry that your incel self can't manage in life.

Lol. No you're not! Not in NJ nor in Texas! Little fella.... you were deemed not dowry worthy by multiple mothers and fathers!

Besides, we know that every single one of your attacks is a confession Kal.

 

[s0me0nesmind1]

Yes, at the very least the founding fathers swept slavery under the rug. Their cowardice not only continues to haunt us but it appears that that cowardice is about as American as Apple pie.

Who are you trying to kid?

Racism is actually alive and well though, thats for sure - it just isn't who you stereotype heh.

 

[Amol S.]

Except I am married. With 2 kids lol. Also the wife works. Sorry that your incel self can't manage in life.





lol the 1619 project has been critiqued and invalidated by many many many reputable sources and historians. It's a joke at this point.

The author is an absolute giant massive fucking moron - and idiots are propping her up out of pure stupidity.

Opinion | The ‘1619 Project’ Gets Schooled

The New York Times tries to rewrite U.S. history, but its falsehoods are exposed by surprising sources.

www.wsj.com

Of course I am single. I am only 25.We want proof/pictures that your married and have kids.

 

[nakedfrog]

Of course I am single. I am only 25.We want proof/pictures that your married and have kids.

Oh, come on, of all the things to attack, this is the stupidest one. I don't think there's any reason to doubt that he's married with kids, and even if for some reason he is lying about it... who cares?

 

[Amol S.]

Oh, come on, of all the things to attack, this is the stupidest one. I don't think there's any reason to doubt that he's married with kids, and even if for some reason he is lying about it... who cares?

Psst. The pic might have maga hats. That's why.

 

[VW MAN]

Except I am married. With 2 kids lol. Also the wife works. Sorry that your incel self can't manage in life.





lol the 1619 project has been critiqued and invalidated by many many many reputable sources and historians. It's a joke at this point.

The author is an absolute giant massive fucking moron - and idiots are propping her up out of pure stupidity.

Opinion | The ‘1619 Project’ Gets Schooled

The New York Times tries to rewrite U.S. history, but its falsehoods are exposed by surprising sources.

www.wsj.com

having a mail-order wife that you attempt to butt rape actually makes you pretty much worse then any so incel ever!

 

[Meghan54]

I am referring to something specific. 1619 claims that the entire reason we went to war for independence was because the colonists believed that England was going to ban slavery in its colonies, and we needed independence in order to prevent that from happening. There is just one problem: there is no evidence that this was the reason we went to war. They were criticized for this by actual historians and ultimately modified their statement from saying it was the only reason we went to war to it was one of the reasons. There is no evidence for that assertion either.

Sorry, but nowhere in all the articles, poems, etc. in the 1619 Project is it even insinuated that the only (entire) reason for the Revolutionary War was slavery. If you can point out the relevant passages from those writings, I’d be more than happy to re-read them. Maybe I missed something when I read it.

 

[HomerJS]

Fine, then it was "founded on" the idea of equality, not the idea of racism. Equality was a founding ideal, even though it didn't really exist much then.

The point is that the reality was different than the founding idea. The problem I have with the 1619 project, for example, is that it makes an argument - based on no evidence - that we fought a war of independence in order to protect and preserve slavery. Which would make it a founding idea.

There is a difference between aspiration and reality, and I think the problem with CRT as it relates to US history is that it isn't content to just discuss the reality of historical racism. It wants white supremacy to be the central founding ideal of the country. I'll accept that when I see evidence.

So you are saying that white people back then who considered blacks nothing more then cattle to be used and exploited for free labor isn't a clear example of white supremacy?

You are complaining about the 1619 projects accuracy yet lived with white people writing history to their favor often lying in the process. I was taught growing up in school that Columbus discovered America. We know that is utter horseshit. Did native Americans, blacks, Asians, Hispanics have anything to do with the creating of that history? No. Even today white guys are trying to whitewash the history of just 6 months ago. If they can't even get that right why should their complaints about the 1619 project be entertained?

 

[woolfe9998]

So you are saying that white people back then who considered blacks nothing more then cattle to be used and exploited for free labor isn't a clear example of white supremacy?

No, I was clearly making a distinction between founding ideals and the reality of the time.

You are complaining about the 1619 projects accuracy yet lived with white people writing history to their favor often lying in the process. I was taught growing up in school that Columbus discovered America. We know that is utter horseshit. Did native Americans, blacks, Asians, Hispanics have anything to do with the creating of that history? No. Even today white guys are trying to whitewash the history of just 6 months ago. If they can't even get that right why should their complaints about the 1619 project be entertained?

Oh, no doubt. In the south, they've been pushing lost cause revisionism which tries to argue that slavery didn't cause the civil war. And they've been teaching it in their schools.

The problem is that you don't correct inaccurate history by posing another form of inaccurate history. History class isn't a court room where two advocates push biased versions and the class is like a jury who gets to decide where the truth lies. There is only one way to teach history: straight. The problem with 1619 is that its authors see it as an antidote to whitewashed history, but what they are doing is trying to cure the problem by posing a new version which is biased in the opposite direction.

And ironically, 1619 was the impetus for some of these republicans laws which are trying to censor classroom discussion.

 

[ivwshane]

No, I was clearly making a distinction between founding ideals and the reality of the time.



Oh, no doubt. In the south, they've been pushing lost cause revisionism which tries to argue that slavery didn't cause the civil war. And they've been teaching it in their schools.

The problem is that you don't correct inaccurate history by posing another form of inaccurate history. History class isn't a court room where two advocates push biased versions and the class is like a jury who gets to decide where the truth lies. There is only one way to teach history: straight. The problem with 1619 is that its authors see it as an antidote to whitewashed history, but what they are doing is trying to cure the problem by posing a new version which is biased in the opposite direction.

And ironically, 1619 was the impetus for some of these republicans laws which are trying to censor classroom discussion.

If they were inaccurate more than once and with the intent of creating a false narrative I would agree with you. Do you have any more examples that highlight this false narrative?