Paddington
Senior member
- Jun 26, 2006
- 538
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
New York was a basket case until a Republican mayor took over...Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Yes it has problems that are specific to Detroit, but you can't give liberalism a pass.Originally posted by: n yusef
Are you really blaming Detroit on liberalism? Just about every big city is populated and run by lefties. Detroit has specific problems unrelated to the political ideology of its leaders.
No doubt the anti-business attitude that runs through-out liberalism is contributing to Detroit's continuing problems.
ney york city, chicago and san fransico are all very liberal and progressive cities, yet they are all among the most important cities in the world for global business
so much for that line of thinking
I hear lubbock is thriving
Well the problem is though that places like New York City, San Francisco, and to a lesser extent Chicago have certain natural advantages for which people are willing to put up with the hassles of red tape and high taxes in order to do business there. Detroit is cold with bland geography. Who wants to deal with its living wage laws, ultra-millitant trade unionism, high taxes, red tape, "hire Detroit blacks" mandates, graft paid to the council, etc. and many, many other hassles when you could go to Dallas, TX and deal with far fewer of those hassles? Or hell, even in Michigan, things go a lot more smoothly in pro-business Grand Rapids/Western MI area.
And I say this as a resident of the "fly over" country, and in fact of the greater Detroit region. Unless you have those certain unique advantages, nobody gives a shit if you're Ft. Wayne, El Paso, Wichita, or Fargo. They go for cheap costs. In Detroit, not only do you have the obvious high taxes, high wages, but you also have the red tape, trade unionism, tricky racial politics, and numerous other hassles that would make you absolutely crazy to do business there, unless the government were giving you a huge tax break. Whatever businesses remain in downtown Detroit are there because of the confluence of the expressways there and/or generous incentives from Michigan or the Federal government. GM is the only automaker actually based in Detroit. Most of the Detroit area factories are in the suburbs. If you look at population, out of ~4.5 million in metro Detroit, maybe 900,000 (and perhaps less than 800,000) now live in the city proper. Most of the suburbs are pleasant enough. Back in 1950, I think Detroit had 1.9 million just in the city.
That's why I don't think the same policies are what's best for every part of the country. Maybe San Francisco can get by with living wage laws, 10% income taxes, lots of red tape, and still prosper. That's because you don't get San Francisco's year round light jacket weather, and it's pleasant hills and dramatic scenery with 3 sides of water anywhere else. OTOH, there's a lot of places like Dallas that are flat and hot, or like Columbus which is flat and cold. If they adopt San Francisco style policies, businesses just flee en masse. The flyover country cities need low taxes, right-to-work laws, deregulation, etc. in order to maximize their growth.
