I don't think you understand the context of Einstein, the time period and the audience he was writing that for.
It's akin to a Nazi writing a manifesto that the 'party' is all that matters and we must eradicate the genetically impure.
I have been on both sides of the fence. I want profit. I know I do a better job so I want more for doing it. Why should I bust my ass for 80 hours only to make the same government stipend that the guy sitting for 40 watching a gas pump makes?
Stunning use of hyperbole, Godwin, false attribution & obfuscation. You really are desperate, desperate to maintain denial.
And, uhh, people who really do work 80 hours a week don't spend nearly as much time posting on the internet as you do here...
WTF do you mean?
I'd never fucking work 80 works a week every week in today's system...I'd pretty much have to in you and that other dude's socialist dogma.
loser.
Heh. Then where the Hell did your reference to working 80hrs/week in the first post above come from, anyway? Was that supposed to be about something other than your imagination?
I mistakenly thought it was, or was supposed to be.
What socialist dogma? Obviously, there's one in your head, but it has nothing to do with what's been offered here.
The fiscal mechanics of our society have been deeply altered by the right wing ideology of Reaganomics in the international marketplace. Capitalist mechanisms that push money to the top have been enhanced, while those that tend to distribute it back downward have been damaged & destroyed. Our society splits along the lines of credit and debt. In the not too distant past, Unions could demand higher wages & better benefits, and get them, dragging the rest of working people along. Tariffs prevented offshoring of capital and jobs, and high federal income taxes at the top limited the power of wealth, preventing runaway inequality. Housing prices didn't boom & bust, as with the Ownership society flimflam.
Instead of wage & benefit increases, working people got bigger lines of credit. Instead of stable employment, the companies they work for got bought, looted & sold by private equity firms. Instead of entry & low level manufacturing jobs, those got offshored & automated, along with the commerce supporting them. Instead of housing that was actually affordable, they got McMansions in the Exurbs that they didn't have a prayer of keeping after the introductory interest rate ran its course.
Instead of some sense of fiscal responsibility, they got Reagan/GHWB, who quadrupled the debt, and then they got GWB who doubled it again. And it all happened because a very small but important slice of the population, the upper middle class, was left unaffected or slightly improved by such policies.
And we got the S&L fiasco, thanks to deregulation, followed by the LTCM affair, which almost brought down the financial system, the tech bust, and the crowning glory of financial capitalism, the Ownership Society & its aftermath.
We do have socialism of a sort, socialism for the Rich, where we privatize profits & socialize losses, because, admittedly, America does need her Rich. The problem is that they seem to think that they don't need the rest of us except when they need a bailout, or when they want to maintain high profits & grand illusions by extending credit in ways that are unwarranted & abusive.
We've entered a period where redistribution will enter a new phase, a disorganized one of debt default. People simply won't be able to pay, something that's already happening wrt housing, something that rightfully should have destroyed their creditors, per capitalist dogma, yet hasn't because of the GWB sponsored bank bailout. We really should have nationalized the bastards, as was done in Sweden in the early 90's- fat chance of that with "free market capitalists" running the govt, huh? When their banker buddies showed up raving drunk, covered in blood, they put it off to excitable boys, cleaned 'em up a little, put money in their pockets, sent 'em out to have some more fun.
It was just the first of many hostage taking adventures executed by Repubs, the Go-fers of the wealthy, with many more to come.
If the people at the top get the benefits of socialism, why not the rest of us?