Originally posted by: element®
Anyone else notice they said "put a bit of diesel in it"? This is a diesel truck? No wonder it survived. It doesn't even need an ignition system. Try this with a regular gasoline engine.
Originally posted by: Hubris
Originally posted by: element®
Anyone else notice they said "put a bit of diesel in it"? This is a diesel truck? No wonder it survived. It doesn't even need an ignition system. Try this with a regular gasoline engine.
Isn't that what they call gas? Or is that petrol?
Originally posted by: Eli
It's not a diesel. I noticed that too, must've just been a slipup.
Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
They're not doing it right, the truck, though been through a lot of abuse, but they're all calculated abuses. Take the wrecking ball for instance, it only dented the hood (), and scratch up some other impertinent parts. The fire was in the truck bed and the cabin, and was put out subsequently. The truck was placed atop of the building, which would be the side to fall last, any cars or trucks would have survive riding the rubbles down. I've heard stories of HUMAN that were capable of that (9/11). So in short, it was a very good commercial.![]()
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
For gods sake. To all you people determined to not be impressed by this are sad.
1 - It was for fun, not an experiment
2 - You cannot deny that a car, any car, that is washed away at Sea and starts again deserves respect.
3 - They could have just totaly destroyed it with the wrecking ball, but where is the fun in that?
4 - Whatever anyone says, the building demolition thing is amazing. THE THING STILL DROVE-THE DRIVETRAIN WAS STILL OPERATIONAL!
/rant off
Originally posted by: styrafoam
jeremy clarkson sucks.
Its his haircut, it makes all of the little things seem that much worse to him.
Originally posted by: Bassyhead
Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
They're not doing it right, the truck, though been through a lot of abuse, but they're all calculated abuses. Take the wrecking ball for instance, it only dented the hood (), and scratch up some other impertinent parts. The fire was in the truck bed and the cabin, and was put out subsequently. The truck was placed atop of the building, which would be the side to fall last, any cars or trucks would have survive riding the rubbles down. I've heard stories of HUMAN that were capable of that (9/11). So in short, it was a very good commercial.![]()
Very good points, I'd have to agree
Originally posted by: nourdmrolNMT1
hmm, i love the blatant, only this truck could stand up to this.
lets try another truck. there is no proof other trucks cant stand up to this, they just only showed one truck. and everything was done with a top to bottom damage, do horrizontal damage and see what happens, most truck cant stand that, frames, drive trains, wheels.
MIKE
