Cowboys/Packers!!

Page 15 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Reckoner

Lifer
Jun 11, 2004
10,851
1
81
That Ref crew is garbage. That's the same crew that reffed the Pats/Indy game. Why they put rookie refs in big games like this is beyond me.
 

Regs

Lifer
Aug 9, 2002
16,666
21
81
Originally posted by: Homerboy
TOLD TA SO!!! Where are all those Packers/Dallas haters fans now? LOLOLOL Bring on the pats again.

I clearly do not understand this. "Packers/Dallas haters fans"
wth is that?


I hate these two damn teams! WOOOOHOOOO!

I dunno... either.
 

GoPackGo

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 2003
6,521
600
126
Packers played pretty good all things considered.

The one ref sucked. Not an excuse. Just a fact.

I more worried about Favre.
 

GuitarDaddy

Lifer
Nov 9, 2004
11,465
1
0
Good Gawd the NFL Network sucks!!!!!!!!!!!

Terrible broadcast, terrible broadcasters, technical difficulties galor. The cameramen were morons, the sound guys were inept, and Gumble was Gumble. Since the NFL owners aren't rich enough:confused: and find it necessary to create a way to suck more money out of the loyal fan base, they should at least provide a decent product for the extra money.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: GuitarDaddy
Good Gawd the NFL Network sucks!!!!!!!!!!!

Terrible broadcast, terrible broadcasters, technical difficulties galor. The cameramen were morons, the sound guys were inept, and Gumble was Gumble. Since the NFL owners aren't rich enough:confused: and find it necessary to create a way to suck more money out of the loyal fan base, they should at least provide a decent product for the extra money.

as i said when nfl channel first started. i think its the amature channel. where the real people get training to learn how to ref, use the camera, etc
 

91TTZ

Lifer
Jan 31, 2005
14,374
1
0
Originally posted by: vi_edit
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: adairusmc
Maybe that is because Romo is a superior player when compared to Favre.

Stats don't agree with your assessment.

2007 Favre
97.9 QB Rating
296 completions
439 attempts
67.4 completion %
3412 yards
284.3 yards/gm
7.8 yards/attempt
22 TD's
10 INT
3 Fumbles lost



2007 Romo
107.1 QB Rating
252 completions
382 attempts
66.0 completion percent
3352 yards
279.3 yards/game
8.8 yards/attempt
33 TD's
14 INT
2 Fumbles lost

Farve has a ton of records and stats under his belt. Certainly one of the best QB's to ever step on the field. But Romo has outplayed him when you compare raw stats.

According to your stats, Favre has more completions, has passed for more yards, has a higher completion percentage, and has less interceptions than Romo this year.

Romo also has TO on his team, and TO is great. But I'm not a Romo basher, I think he is a great QB.

 

Alistar7

Lifer
May 13, 2002
11,978
0
0
lol Cobra, you better hope the Pack doesn't smack big D down come January. Your bumping this thread to keep laughing at the Packs fans is funny though :D
 

buck

Lifer
Dec 11, 2000
12,273
4
81
Originally posted by: KK
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
I think he is a great QB.

Just not a great place kick holder. :p

:D

I had seats right near the tunnels during that game. Ohh Mr. Romo, thank you for making that game so special. :)