• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Country's Full - Trump Slams Door on Refugees

Page 28 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Taking bets on what Trump is going to say about the judge(s). 1. His wife says he can't get it up, 2. He's a molester of blind orphans, 3. He's the anti-Christ. Get your bets in soon. I estimate t-minus 20 minutes before the tweet is in, tops.

Edit: it's actually 3 judges. Perhaps we'll hear the same slander on all three, or maybe he outdoes himself and comes up with a unique one for each.
 
Federal appeals court maintains suspension of Trump’s immigration order

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...2_story.html?tid=sm_tw&utm_term=.a05654125d51

hahahahahaaaaa

How is there any room to deny the explicit meaning below?
The Judges are surely ignoring the law to come to this conclusion.
Though I invite anyone to help make sense of it.

8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens
(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President

Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.​
 
How is there any room to deny the explicit meaning below?
The Judges are surely ignoring the law to come to this conclusion.
Though I invite anyone to help make sense of it.

8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens
(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President

Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.​
You certainly know better than they do how to interpret all applicable code AND case law.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ns1
Wonder if some staffer is currently rounding up every cell phone in the White House to keep Trump from Twitter.
Do you really think Trump is sitting around tweeting or some guy is doing it for him? I know the media leads us to believe certain things but I find it hard to believe that Trump is the one tweeting. Yeah it sounds like him but that might be part of the game.
 
Do you really think Trump is sitting around tweeting or some guy is doing it for him? I know the media leads us to believe certain things but I find it hard to believe that Trump is the one tweeting. Yeah it sounds like him but that might be part of the game.
I think it's both. The ranting self absorbed bullshit I have no doubt come from his little fingers directly.

Do you really think a staffer would use the POTUS Twitter account to retweet Teumps attack on an American business?
 
08vGLRZ.jpg


9kfjyEj.jpg
 
Do you really think Trump is sitting around tweeting or some guy is doing it for him? I know the media leads us to believe certain things but I find it hard to believe that Trump is the one tweeting. Yeah it sounds like him but that might be part of the game.
Go check @realDonaldTrump. right now.
 
CheetoJeezus has to be ready to ass-plode right now. Damned librul judges overturning his beautiful, the best written EO ever. Sad.
 
A search for 8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens turned up nothing in that document.
So the Judges ignored the law....

Although our jurisprudence has long counseled deference to the political branches on matters of immigration and national security, neither the Supreme Court nor our court has ever held that courts lack the authority to review executive action in those arenas for compliance with the Constitution. To the contrary, the Supreme Court has repeatedly and explicitly rejected the notion that the political branches have unreviewable authority over immigration or are not subject to the Constitution when policymaking in that context. See Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 695 (2001) (emphasizing that the power of the political branches over immigration “is subject to important constitutional limitations”); Chadha, 462 U.S. at 940-41 (rejecting the argument that Congress has “unreviewable authority over the regulation of aliens,” and affirming that courts can review “whether Congress has chosen a constitutionally permissible means of implementing that power”).6 Our court has likewise made clear that “[a]lthough alienage classifications are closely connected to matters of foreign policy and national security,” courts “can and do review foreign policy arguments that are offered to justify legislative or executive action when constitutional rights are at stake.” American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Comm. v. Reno, 70 F.3d 1045, 1056 (9th Cir. 1995).
 
Back
Top