Grooveriding
Diamond Member
I renew my desire for Trump to get into online gaming. So I can join his server and tell him 'get fvcked, brah'
Federal appeals court maintains suspension of Trump’s immigration order
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...2_story.html?tid=sm_tw&utm_term=.a05654125d51
hahahahahaaaaa
You certainly know better than they do how to interpret all applicable code AND case law.How is there any room to deny the explicit meaning below?
The Judges are surely ignoring the law to come to this conclusion.
Though I invite anyone to help make sense of it.
8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens
(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.
Do you really think Trump is sitting around tweeting or some guy is doing it for him? I know the media leads us to believe certain things but I find it hard to believe that Trump is the one tweeting. Yeah it sounds like him but that might be part of the game.Wonder if some staffer is currently rounding up every cell phone in the White House to keep Trump from Twitter.
I think it's both. The ranting self absorbed bullshit I have no doubt come from his little fingers directly.Do you really think Trump is sitting around tweeting or some guy is doing it for him? I know the media leads us to believe certain things but I find it hard to believe that Trump is the one tweeting. Yeah it sounds like him but that might be part of the game.
Any breakdown on how they voted? Curious if Clifton sided with the gov or with the state.
Go check @realDonaldTrump. right now.Do you really think Trump is sitting around tweeting or some guy is doing it for him? I know the media leads us to believe certain things but I find it hard to believe that Trump is the one tweeting. Yeah it sounds like him but that might be part of the game.
Yeah just read the full decision. He lost bigly.Since the vote by the 3 judges was unanimous, prob. the states.
They need to point out to him SCOTUS is highly unlikely to overrule this decision. He's not doing well with conservative judges. Don't think liberal ones will be siding with him at all.
http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2017/02/09/17-35105.pdf
There's the official decision
Maybe you're just wrong? Does that possibility enter your head at all?A search for 8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens turned up nothing in that document.
So the Judges ignored the law....
They need to point out to him SCOTUS is highly unlikely to overrule this decision. He's not doing well with conservative judges. Don't think liberal ones will be siding with him at all.
A search for 8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens turned up nothing in that document.
So the Judges ignored the law....
Although our jurisprudence has long counseled deference to the political branches on matters of immigration and national security, neither the Supreme Court nor our court has ever held that courts lack the authority to review executive action in those arenas for compliance with the Constitution. To the contrary, the Supreme Court has repeatedly and explicitly rejected the notion that the political branches have unreviewable authority over immigration or are not subject to the Constitution when policymaking in that context. See Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 695 (2001) (emphasizing that the power of the political branches over immigration “is subject to important constitutional limitations”); Chadha, 462 U.S. at 940-41 (rejecting the argument that Congress has “unreviewable authority over the regulation of aliens,” and affirming that courts can review “whether Congress has chosen a constitutionally permissible means of implementing that power”).6 Our court has likewise made clear that “[a]lthough alienage classifications are closely connected to matters of foreign policy and national security,” courts “can and do review foreign policy arguments that are offered to justify legislative or executive action when constitutional rights are at stake.” American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Comm. v. Reno, 70 F.3d 1045, 1056 (9th Cir. 1995).
Pay closer attention. It's already begun. Tame. But it's only the beginning.http://thehill.com/policy/transportation/318327-appeals-court-rejects-trump-on-travel-ban
Appeals court unanimously rejects Trump on travel ban
Bets on what time in the morning the Twitter meltdown starts?
http://thehill.com/policy/transportation/318327-appeals-court-rejects-trump-on-travel-ban
Appeals court unanimously rejects Trump on travel ban
Bets on what time in the morning the Twitter meltdown starts?
A search for 8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens turned up nothing in that document.
So the Judges ignored the law....