Could/should we outlaw protesters hiding their identify via masks and hoods?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Some of you may say that such a law would be a violation of their first amendment rights. However, showing up to a protest dressed in a mask is not part of the free speech and right to assembly that is being expressed at such rallies. In other words they can still freely express themselves without the masks and hoods. In fact, in many parts of the country wearing a mask in public is already illegal.

It seems that such laws would give the police tools to fight violence and vandalism before they happened as opposed to waiting until afterwards.
Yavol, und seig heil, heir Führer! When you're through with the First Amendment, I'm sure there are more you'd love to destroy. :thumbsdown: :| :thumbsdown:

Do you mean "Jawohl" and "Herr"?

As to ProfJohn, that's the stupidest thing I've heard. How can you fight crime before it happens? If it hasn't happened, there hasn't been a crime, and there's nobody to prosecute. Take your thoughtcrime BS elsewhere.
 
Jun 27, 2005
19,216
1
61
Originally posted by: JD50
It should be mandatory for you to have a picture of your face on a drivers license. If you don't want your picture taken, then don't drive.

In Alaska it's not uncommon to see a DL with "No Photo Required" where the pic should be. There's no DMV in many of the villages so the licenses are issued from Anchorage or Fairbanks with no photo.
 

JD50

Lifer
Sep 4, 2005
11,925
2,908
136
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Originally posted by: JD50
It should be mandatory for you to have a picture of your face on a drivers license. If you don't want your picture taken, then don't drive.

In Alaska it's not uncommon to see a DL with "No Photo Required" where the pic should be. There's no DMV in many of the villages so the licenses are issued from Anchorage or Fairbanks with no photo.


I can see where exceptions could be made for situations like that, and I know that it isn't mandatory to have your picture on your license in all 50 states, but I think that it should be.
 
Feb 24, 2001
14,513
4
81
Originally posted by: k1pp3r
Originally posted by: dyna
Originally posted by: JD50
No way, although I might not agree with their actions, they certainly have the right to wear whatever they like while they are protesting. But, if people start vandalizing and getting violent, I am all for the Police using tear gas, pepper spray, etc....


What if its a gas mask?

Rubber bullets?

Shaving cream covered cannon balls
 

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
After pictures of the idiots in masks burning the flag and soldier and the people smashing windows in Seattle I am wondering why we haven?t made it illegal for people to protest in masks and hoods?

It is almost inevitable that when these types of people show up at an event that some type of illegality is going to follow. So why not prevent the illegality beforehand by outlawing the mechanism that allows it to happen.

Take away their masks and you take away their ability to break the law incognito. Also I am almost 100% positive that these people burning the flag and smashing windows would not have done so if they knew their pictures were going to show up in the local paper where thier mom, dad, girlfriend, boss and everyone could see and identify them. Additionally, if they did break the law it would be much easier for the police to track them down.

Some of you may say that such a law would be a violation of their first amendment rights. However, showing up to a protest dressed in a mask is not part of the free speech and right to assembly that is being expressed at such rallies. In other words they can still freely express themselves without the masks and hoods. In fact, in many parts of the country wearing a mask in public is already illegal.

It seems that such laws would give the police tools to fight violence and vandalism before they happened as opposed to waiting until afterwards.
Since you seem to feel anonymity is wrong, how about putting your money where your mouth is and giving us all your real name and address?

...


Thought not.

The United States is supposed to be about exalting personal liberties. Have you ever thought about moving to a country where your kind of thinking is valued, e.g., North Korea?
 

piasabird

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
17,168
60
91
Well what happens if it is cold and you want to wear a bacalava? What about Montana and Alaska? What happens when you go skiing?

I might ok a law which says if you wear a ski mask in public that the cops have an automatic right to search you as a syspected terrorist. My wife who is korean was pulled over because she had a box in the back of her truck. This is the same thing.
 

Martin

Lifer
Jan 15, 2000
29,178
1
81
A funny thing I've noticed about people like PoJo is that while they pay lip service to the idea protesting, its always highly distanced from protesting in the real world. You know, they might do something bad, so lets require them to reveal their faces. They might cause traffic delays, so lets have them protest in small groups and only during certain times. They might cause a ruckus, so let's hole them up in a fenced 'free speech zone' and have them guarded by the police.
 

ITJunkie

Platinum Member
Apr 17, 2003
2,512
0
76
www.techange.com
I see you referencing the Seattle WTO protests and, as is usually the case with you, you're blathering the usual partisan FUD!!!
Let me tell you what it was like there Prof. I was working downtown during the whole damn thing. There were THOUSANDS of protestor's from all over the bloody world. There were tons of people dressed in costumes demonstrating for their various causes. You had a combination of very poor police planning on the city's part and way more demonstrators than anyone thought possible. The Sh1t didn't hit the fan until the overwhelmed and completely understaffed Seattle Police Department started panicking and launching tear gas. Yes there were a few anarchists that totally took advantage of the situation and caused a vast majority of the damage but they were just that...a small minority.
I, for one, found it surreal walking around the streets, smelling tear gas, pepper spray, etc. I also was extremely humbled by the bravery of some of the cops as well as the protestor's who tried to defuse a situation that had already exploded. This, in my view, is exactly what America is all about. Freedom means taking the good with the bad.

Only fascists want to limit that freedom in the name of security!! :|
 

judasmachine

Diamond Member
Sep 15, 2002
8,515
3
81
we should arrest anyone who threatens to take away a US citizens right to wear whatever the hell they want whenever the hell they want to. (short of thongs on old men)
 

PingSpike

Lifer
Feb 25, 2004
21,758
603
126
BOSTON TEA PARTY!

This defining event in our countries history featured a bunch of guys dressed up as Indians just in case it didn't work.
 

judasmachine

Diamond Member
Sep 15, 2002
8,515
3
81
Originally posted by: PingSpike
BOSTON TEA PARTY!

This defining event in our countries history featured a bunch of guys dressed up as Indians just in case it didn't work.

damn terrorists.
 

PingSpike

Lifer
Feb 25, 2004
21,758
603
126
Originally posted by: judasmachine
Originally posted by: PingSpike
BOSTON TEA PARTY!

This defining event in our countries history featured a bunch of guys dressed up as Indians just in case it didn't work.

damn terrorists.

History is written by the victor. Its spelled, revolutionaries. :p
 

judasmachine

Diamond Member
Sep 15, 2002
8,515
3
81
Originally posted by: PingSpike
Originally posted by: judasmachine
Originally posted by: PingSpike
BOSTON TEA PARTY!

This defining event in our countries history featured a bunch of guys dressed up as Indians just in case it didn't work.

damn terrorists.

History is written by the victor. Its spelled, revolutionaries. :p

terrorism, revolution, subversion, sabotage are all just tools for the underdog, it's just warfare no matter how you slice it.
 

tw1164

Diamond Member
Dec 8, 1999
3,995
0
76
Originally posted by: dmcowen674

There are an estimated 500,000 Mennonites in the U.S., according to Donald Kraybill, a professor and a fellow at the Young Center for Anabaptist and Pietist Studies at Elizabethtown College in Pennsylvania.

You cannot expect this to continue unabated without something snapping.


He was one of my Sociology professors.

 

Steeplerot

Lifer
Mar 29, 2004
13,051
6
81
For all the talk about small government staying out of people business and all the libertarian lip service these folks show their true colors.

Submit to the government or else, right comrades?

FOS as usual, and you all wonder why people do not take conservatism seriously?

Modern conservatives = goosesteppers too lazy to march.

Will the right ever learn?
 

JD50

Lifer
Sep 4, 2005
11,925
2,908
136
Originally posted by: Steeplerot
For all the talk about small government staying out of people business and all the libertarian lip service these folks show their true colors.

Submit to the government or else, right comrades?

FOS as usual, and you all wonder why people do not take conservatism seriously, all hat no cattle.

Just a bunch of goosesteppers too lazy to march.


The only person that I have seen endorse this is the OP, the other conservatives in this thread do not agree with it.......
 

Steeplerot

Lifer
Mar 29, 2004
13,051
6
81
Originally posted by: JD50
Originally posted by: Steeplerot
For all the talk about small government staying out of people business and all the libertarian lip service these folks show their true colors.

Submit to the government or else, right comrades?

FOS as usual, and you all wonder why people do not take conservatism seriously, all hat no cattle.

Just a bunch of goosesteppers too lazy to march.


The only person that I have seen endorse this is the OP, the other conservatives in this thread do not agree with it.......


Well that is somewhat comforting, although knowing puffer john this is a popular talking point in the right wing blogosphere.

In this day and age of cameras everywhere there is really no other choice but to wear bandannas on your face.

Hell, when I go to events I wear one, not because I cause any harm but because there is always a ton of rightwingnuts filming everything and snooping into peoples lives.

Also I am not into being gassed by overzealous cops for using my rights protected by our constitution.

Covering your nose and mouth helps with not getting ill from the inevitable teargas/pepperspray canisters.
 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
After pictures of the idiots in masks burning the flag and soldier and the people smashing windows in Seattle I am wondering why we haven?t made it illegal for people to protest in masks and hoods?

It is almost inevitable that when these types of people show up at an event that some type of illegality is going to follow. So why not prevent the illegality beforehand by outlawing the mechanism that allows it to happen.

Take away their masks and you take away their ability to break the law incognito. Also I am almost 100% positive that these people burning the flag and smashing windows would not have done so if they knew their pictures were going to show up in the local paper where thier mom, dad, girlfriend, boss and everyone could see and identify them. Additionally, if they did break the law it would be much easier for the police to track them down.

Some of you may say that such a law would be a violation of their first amendment rights. However, showing up to a protest dressed in a mask is not part of the free speech and right to assembly that is being expressed at such rallies. In other words they can still freely express themselves without the masks and hoods. In fact, in many parts of the country wearing a mask in public is already illegal.

It seems that such laws would give the police tools to fight violence and vandalism before they happened as opposed to waiting until afterwards.

You seem awfully obsessed with protesters lately, what's your deal? You just can't stand people who are opposed to this war, can you?
 

Mardeth

Platinum Member
Jul 24, 2002
2,608
0
0
Trivial freedoms/rights are overrated. How many masked protestors are even there to protest rather than just to generate general havoc.
 

JD50

Lifer
Sep 4, 2005
11,925
2,908
136
Originally posted by: Mardeth
Trivial freedoms/rights are overrated. How many masked protestors are even there to protest rather than just to generate general havoc.

What?

 

extra

Golden Member
Dec 18, 1999
1,947
7
81
Are you trolling? I'm not making a personal attack, I'm asking you honestly. Are you trolling? Do you really mean this:

"why we haven?t made it illegal for people to protest in masks and hoods?"

I am sorry but reading this actually brought a tear to my eye. Because of your posting history I figured you seriously meant that. If you were serious...I can't fathom the kind of thinking that would lead someone to think like that. I literally can't wrap my mind around it. I can't understand it. It is so foriegn to me. I just can't imagine myself ever saying that someone can't anonmyously express themselves. I just can't imagine that the free country I grew up in is turning out like this. What is even scarrier is the people in power right now seem to be asking those same kind of questions.

I really hope you weren't serious.

Wearing a mask or not isn't going to save you if you commit a crime and the police come and handcuff you.

Hiding your identity is not wrong.

This country was founded by people who wrote things under pseudonyms to hide their identity. Our very constitution had things written anonymously for and against its ratification. The people wrote anonmyously and would sign with fictional names.

Think about what you are saying. Really, really, think about it.
 

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
I am more concerned with the destruction of property than the flag burning bit.

There were hundreds if not thousands of people at the Portland rally and they all got their messages out without the need to resort to hiding their faces via masks. Inevitably in nearly every case like this it is the few dozen that feel the need to show up with masks on that cause all the damage to property and vandalism.

The idea of making the mask thing illegal is that the peaceful protesters can still get their message out, but the violent and destructive people will be robbed of the chance to engage in their anti-social behavior.

And for those of you attacking me here is the law in North Carolina:
?No person or persons shall in this State, while wearing any mask, hood or device whereby the person, face or voice is disguised so as to conceal the identity of the wearer, enter, or appear upon or within the public property of any municipality or county of the State, or of the State of North Carolina. (1953, c. 1193, s. 7.)?

And this little ruling by the 2nd court.
"The anti-mask law, far from restricting expression based on its message, is not restricting protected expression at all," the appellate court decided.

"Because the anti-mask law regulates the conduct of mask wearing, and does so in a constitutionally legitimate manner, it can legitimately create an exception for mask wearing that Occurs in connection with a masquerade party or like entertainment.'"

The appeals court said the Supreme Court in numerous decisions has recognized a right to anonymous speech but "has never held that freedom of association or the right to engage in anonymous speech entails a right to conceal one's appearance in a public demonstration."
They are also illegal in at least West Va, Va and Fl and I am sure if I dug around enough I could find laws in nearly every state.
 

XMan

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
12,513
49
91
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Some of you may say that such a law would be a violation of their first amendment rights. However, showing up to a protest dressed in a mask is not part of the free speech and right to assembly that is being expressed at such rallies. In other words they can still freely express themselves without the masks and hoods. In fact, in many parts of the country wearing a mask in public is already illegal.

It seems that such laws would give the police tools to fight violence and vandalism before they happened as opposed to waiting until afterwards.
Jawohl, und seig heil, herr Führer! When you're through with the First Amendment, I'm sure there are more you'd love to destroy. :thumbsdown: :| :thumbsdown:

< Fixed German spelling. Thanks, Boberfett. :cool: >


Godwin's law FTW.

PJ is making a poor argument, but that's no excuse to label him a Nazi, Harv.