That's the thing, Many people are sitting on a 920 to get the system running and waiting for the hex cores. I know that's exactly what I did. Why bother with LGA1156 when there are MUCH more powerful processors for LGA1366 coming soon. Plus, the x58 platform gives you much more room for growth. Just because a person doesn't buy every top end part right away, doesn't mean they don't ever plan to later. If you "settle" for LGA1156, you are much more limited with your expansion options.Andy is saying if you bought 1366 with just a 920 then you are not an enthusiast with unlimited cash nor are you worried about the extra few percent the higher end i7's give. In this case the cheaper platform is a better choice. If you aren't going to upgrade to i9 until it is as cheap or nearly as cheap as the 920 was then it was pretty pointless of you to waste the extra 100 bucks on the 1366 platform. Buy an SSD or something.
The only thing I'd say is that some people might be waiting for i9 because of the extra cores can obviously be way more beneficial than the extra clock speed of a 975 vs a 920. Even an enthusiast might not spend 800 extra bucks for some clock speed but it might be worth it for 2 more cores.
Don't be. If it does what you want it to do and you're not planning on upgrading any time soon, then you made the right purchase.lol this thread made me scared I bought an i7 860![]()
I understand that you're trying desperately hard to make a name for yourself so that you can get in the editors' good graces and land a reviewer spot just so you can get freebies, but come on - everybody sees through your bullshit. This isn't a marketing forum. If you want that, head over to the Video Cards and Graphics subforum where you can join the evangelist crews from Nvidia or ATI/AMD; this kind of shit is sadly tolerated over there. If you plan on staying over here, I suggest you shut the hell up, listen and learn from people who actually know what they're talking about.
At least my statements based on proof. Your proof is merely a sentence "LGA1366 is better.". Such an ignorant guy who talks based on feeling instead of evidence!How true. What's even funnier is that he's underclocking his memory....why? Who knows.....maybe his "expertise" isn't quite so expert. Or maybe it's that he cannot figure out how to run his RAM at its rated speed. Sure, he got his i5 up to 3.6GHz, at least according to his sig, but running 1600MHz-rated RAM at 1440MHz and not even dropping the CAS setting to take advantage of the slower speed of his RAM?
From his sig: Kingston KHX1600C8D3K2/4GX @1440MHz 8-8-8-24
Sounds more and more like a high school kid who's read a little and spouts off like he's experienced. Maybe he's trying to impress with his "expertise" the local Best Buy Geek Squad for a job interview. He certainly isn't much of an enthusiast given what he's using or accomplishing.
Don't be. If it does what you want it to do and you're not planning on upgrading any time soon, then you made the right purchase.
Depends on what you mean by "enthusiast" and the goals of said enthusiast. I consider myself an enthusiast, and there's no way I would have grabbed LGA1366 over 1156.An enthusiast, would have purchased LGA1366 right?
Depends on what you mean by "enthusiast" and the goals of said enthusiast. I consider myself an enthusiast, and there's no way I would have grabbed LGA1366 over 1156.
Agreed, I just built my first rig in my sig...and plan on buying a second rig in the future (couple years) when prices drop a bit, but I figure the current one can last me a couple years for gaming and graphic design. Was just curious about OC'n an 860 and RAM clocking, title got me all excited![]()
From my perspective, i5 buyers fall into the mainstream category. Those buyers have little interest in SLI/Crossfire (if they did have that interest, they certainly wouldn't be buying a "crippled" motherboard/chipset), have no care about reduced memory bandwidth, and have little interest in upgrading to the 6-core cpu line coming out.
X58 buyers, on the other hand, buy that platform because of overclocking ease, ability to SLI/Crossfire at full speed for the slots used, and are forward looking in upgradibility.
Not to say some will claim to be enthusiasts that buy the i5/P55 platform, but they're buying it aware of the limitations.
Guess it all depends upon your definition of enthusiast. Obviously mine is stricter than andy's, who I put into the tinkerer mainstream/soft enthusiast user category.
I think that's the main shortfall of this entire debate. Some in this thread throw out blanket statements without realizing every segment has it's merits and drawbacks. As long as you accept each and it fits your needs, more power to you. Just don't throw out generic statements and back them up with inflated bogus numbers and call them fact.
Given what's occurred in this thread, I would think it would need to be spelled outI was being facetious. If you have to explain the joke, it's no longer relevant.![]()
To be honest, I went with the P55 because of the X58's limitations. Specifically, it would have been much more difficult to build a SFF system of equivalent performance to mine but based on the X58 (heat and power consumption wouldn't allow it).From my perspective, i5 buyers fall into the mainstream category. Those buyers have little interest in SLI/Crossfire (if they did have that interest, they certainly wouldn't be buying a "crippled" motherboard/chipset), have no care about reduced memory bandwidth, and have little interest in upgrading to the 6-core cpu line coming out.
X58 buyers, on the other hand, buy that platform because of overclocking ease, ability to SLI/Crossfire at full speed for the slots used, and are forward looking in upgradibility.
Not to say some will claim to be enthusiasts that buy the i5/P55 platform, but they're buying it aware of the limitations.
Guess it all depends upon your definition of enthusiast. Obviously mine is stricter than andy's, who I put into the tinkerer mainstream/soft enthusiast user category.
Exactly.I think that's the main shortfall of this entire debate. Some in this thread throw out blanket statements without realizing every segment has it's merits and drawbacks. As long as you accept each and it fits your needs, more power to you. Just don't throw out generic statements and back them up with inflated bogus numbers and call them fact.
OK guys, knock off the personal attacks, and keep this thread on topic. Continue and I'll start handing out vacations.
esquared
Anandtech Administrator
OK guys, knock off the personal attacks, and keep this thread on topic. Continue and I'll start handing out vacations.
esquared
Anandtech Administrator
I'd like a vacation to Aruba.
:awe:
To be honest, I went with the P55 because of the X58's limitations. Specifically, it would have been much more difficult to build a SFF system of equivalent performance to mine but based on the X58 (heat and power consumption wouldn't allow it).
Don't be. If it does what you want it to do and you're not planning on upgrading any time soon, then you made the right purchase.
I think that's the main shortfall of this entire debate. Some in this thread throw out blanket statements without realizing every segment has it's merits and drawbacks. As long as you accept each and it fits your needs, more power to you. Just don't throw out generic statements and back them up with inflated bogus numbers and call them fact.
I agree with this 100%, the whole problem I had with him is trying to force his opinon as fact.
do you guys think intel will released 32nm quads for the x58 platform? What are the chances that the 930 will be 32nm?
