Originally posted by: CadetLee
Originally posted by: Whisper
Originally posted by: CadetLee
Originally posted by: FreshPrince
Originally posted by: nick1985
oh no, cops doing their job. what a horrible thing. :roll:
well, they could be writing tickets...or they could be stopping rape, murder, domestic violence, robbery, terroists .... etc
I guess speeding is more important :roll:
OINK!
It's not the police department's job to stop rape/murder/etc. They're there to respond after the fact.
I believe there was a lawsuit against a police department for failure to prevent something, and the ruling was that it's not their job to 'prevent' it.
I don't know if I fully buy into this philosophy. I can see how you can't hold a police department responsible for a crime being committed, but the cornerstone of our justice system is that fair, humane punishment--coupled with respectable uniformed officals enforcing our chosen laws--should prevent crime by dissuading criminals.
'Should' doesn't equal 'does'. Example: We have very solid traffic laws..yet people keep complaining about traffic tickets. Enforcement isn't always a deterrent.
Proactive law enforcement (ie patrolling neighborhoods, etc) does dissuade criminals, but LEOs can't be everywhere at once. Incidentally, I went on a ridealong back in September...ten hour shift, and we only made two traffic stops. One resulted in an arrest, and another in a verbal warning. Some departments have traffic units, and all they do is traffic -- so naturally they aren't going to be waiting for domestic violence calls..they're out enforcing traffic laws.
As far as the car break-in -- the clearance rate of larceny/burglary crimes is low, and higher profile cases consume more resources (and have higher clearance rates). I'd rather have several people working on a murder case than someone trying to find out who broke into a car.
I'm a criminal justice major, btw..if you couldn't guess