Originally posted by: toekramp
her noises remind me of the girl from the Grape Video![]()
Link to Grape video?
Originally posted by: toekramp
her noises remind me of the girl from the Grape Video![]()
Goodwin said the department has treated her family unfairly ever since a relative filed a lawsuit against the city in the early '90s. She had been calling her brother to come to the scene because, she told officers, "I don't trust y'all."
When you say "barbs", are they really barbed? Any chance of using a gun that doesn't penetrate skin? Are they as effective?Originally posted by: pnb263
Oh, and if you reach for those barbs sticking out of you and rip them off before I can get another shock going....
Originally posted by: Ornery
Can the barb be retracted before it's pulled out? Sheesh, I'd worry more about that, than the shock.
Originally posted by: pnb263
From what Ive experienced, there is NOT a 40% failure rate.
The barbs are about the same size as a #16 fish hook. They are small, and once shocked, they pull out of the skin with VERY few problems. The shock itself is what cartilizes the skin and stops the bleeding...
The likelyhood of the shock damaging the cell phone is almost non-existant. It has been shown, nea, proven that you cant kill electrical devices with this thing. After all, you can shoot someone with a pace-maker, and the only side effect is that he will be pissed at you later on down the road.
The #1 rule is SAFETY. this device is safe, effective, and NON-LETHAL. We win, the bad guy wins (sort of... we dont kill him) and the public wins...
<im going to go eat some ice cream now>
Originally posted by: rh71
lol @ doing play-by-play on her cellphone.
BTW you guys should check this one out too: http://www.ogrish.com/archives/fatal_ra...r_accident_in_romania_May_30_2005.html
Originally posted by: BobDaMenkey
She gets no sympathy from me. Bet you she's going to try and sue as well.
Cop shoots chick with Taser that refuses to get out of her car
Originally posted by: Calin
Originally posted by: BobDaMenkey
She gets no sympathy from me. Bet you she's going to try and sue as well.
I would sue - not for the first shock, but for the second. I hope I could at least be allowed to check (on the officer that tasered it the second time) if one can put its hands behind the head immediately after being tasered. If the officer would be able to do it in 5 seconds, I would drop the lawsuit in a second.
(By the way, him being a man means he would receive the shock from the taser set at max - or maybe a bit overvolted)
Originally posted by: Calin
Originally posted by: BobDaMenkey
She gets no sympathy from me. Bet you she's going to try and sue as well.
I would sue - not for the first shock, but for the second. I hope I could at least be allowed to check (on the officer that tasered it the second time) if one can put its hands behind the head immediately after being tasered. If the officer would be able to do it in 5 seconds, I would drop the lawsuit in a second.
(By the way, him being a man means he would receive the shock from the taser set at max - or maybe a bit overvolted)
