Kantastic
Platinum Member
- Sep 23, 2009
- 2,253
- 5
- 81
bureaucracy is like a septic tank all the really big shits float to the top
If you had made that one up, I'd have thought you were clever. Tough I know better.
bureaucracy is like a septic tank all the really big shits float to the top
That may be true in your town, I guess.
Would black people in a suit be messed with as much as a black person in gang attire?
MotionMan
"Franklins jeans are allowed to fall to his knees after his shoes are taken away" LOL yeah..that is what was holding them up. Also i love how they are all thugged out in the video but on the interviews its button up shirts and sweater vests.
What the cop did was wrong, but i love how they present the info in the news story lol
black person in thug attire - fucked
black person in a suit - possibly fucked, definitely more fucked than white person in gang attire.
white person in thug attire - safe
white person in suit - safe
This is an issue? If you want to get somewhere in life, don't jerk off through high school, end up in community college, jerk off through that too, and resort to working as a decriminalized thuga**m*therf*cker. Cops are nothing but a complete waste of taxpayer dollars. Those who grasp onto the naive belief that cops are actually productive members of society are probably the same people who support the perpetual wars in the middle east. Cops are inherently psychologically flawed, and using the lack of "fruition" as an excuse for their scumbag behavior is as flawed as claiming a dog ate a student's homework.
As for the "more serious" consequences of "their actions", 3 months of office duty, that'll teach'em.
If you had made that one up, I'd have thought you were clever. Tough I know better.![]()
This is an issue? If you want to get somewhere in life, don't jerk off through high school, end up in community college, jerk off through that too, and resort to working as a decriminalized thuga**m*therf*cker. Cops are nothing but a complete waste of taxpayer dollars. Those who grasp onto the naive belief that cops are actually productive members of society are probably the same people who support the perpetual wars in the middle east. Cops are inherently psychologically flawed, and using the lack of "fruition" as an excuse for their scumbag behavior is as flawed as claiming a dog ate a student's homework.
As for the "more serious" consequences of "their actions", 3 months of office duty, that'll teach'em.
A real suit or like a playa suit?That may be true in your town, I guess.
Would black people in a suit be messed with as much as a black person in gang attire?
MotionMan
Would be true in any town, racial profiling only applies to black people. Think about it, if a black person robs a store, cops will pull over damn near every black person they come across. White people rob stores all the time, yet I've never been pulled over once. And when I said black people get pulled over and questioned, I'm not referring to ones who fit the description, I mean random black people get pulled over "just incase" Most of which don't even come a tiny bit close to fitting the description. If black people in gang attire get fucked with, it's only right that white people in gang attire get fucked with too. But since they don't, to me that means the gang attire isn't the real reason they're being fucked with? And FYI: baggy jeans aren't gang attire, it's fashion. Gang members wear rags and caps. I bought my last pair of baggy jeans at Nordstroms, I somehow don't see that as being a store where you buy gang clothing.
To recap:
black person in thug attire - fucked
black person in a suit - possibly fucked, definitely more fucked than white person in gang attire.
white person in thug attire - safe
white person in suit - safe
Wow. You have a very sad view of society.
I assume you have some links from reputable sources that will back up your claims, or is it only based on anecdotal stories and biased assumptions?
MotionMan
It's called "Racial Profiling" Not something I made up, not something that's not real. And if you notice the 1st word racial it's pretty clear that people are what's profiled by the police not what they wear. You've never heard of "dress code profiling" now have you?
An African-American student who wished to remain anonymous provided an interesting distinction that diminishes the relevance of racial profiling. He feels that racial profiling is much less an issue for discrimination than "dress profiling" is. The student claims to dress similarly to most of Trinity, and in fact, he has never been racially profiled or asked demeaning questions. He challenged the idea that people automatically assume "black is bad," and instead claimed that "baggy clothes and 'ghetto-urban' dress," something contrary to the norm of Trinity fashion, is a greater basis for fear and suspicion. "Who would you more likely assume goes to Trinity?" he asked, "an African-American student with pearl earrings and a chic skirt, or a Caucasian with baggy Fubu jeans, an exaggerated relaxed walk, and an oversized white t-shirt?"
http://www.trinitytripod.com/news/racial-profiling-still-separates-students-1.2171360#.Tz7bSlF411A
I am not alone in my opinion.
http://www.newyorkbeacon.net/files/be1836s.pdf (search for "dress profiling")
That all being said, my point was not that there is NO RACIAL PROFILING. My point was, if you dress like a punk, criminal or gangster, you should not be surpassed to be treated as one.
MotionMan
So to recap: there *IS* Racial Profiling, this has been proven 100x over. And there *IS* Racial Profiling based on what the person's wearing, this has been proven 100x over. But there's no evidence of this so called "dress profiling" happening outside of people of color. I find that a bit odd, but hay that's just me. *shrug*
I never denied that there is racial profiling.
All I am saying is that if you dress like a punk, criminal or gang member, you should not be surprised when you are treated as one.
You are reading too much into my statement.
MotionMan
Treated like one by someone like you or my mom or an average person? I wouldn't be surprised at all. But police have training and whole divisions dedicated to gangs. So it should be reasonable to assume a police officer's had said training. There's a huge difference between the perception of gang clothing, and actually being in a gang. With such training it's not hard to tell the difference between a gang member and a dude who's dressed in clothes he bought at Macy's that appears to have the characteristics, but that's only to the untrained eye.
Now if a cop truely doesn't know what to look for, it mean they weren't trained very well.
And, based on your assertions and links, isn't it doubly-stupid to dress like that if you are black or hispanic? There are parts of your appearance you cannot control, color being one (MJ aside). There are parts of your appearance you can absolutely, 100% control, like your dress. Why not choose to not make yourself any more of a target and not dress like a punk, criminal or gang member?
Because this is America and I should have the right to dress like a police officer without people assuming I'm a police officer. Why you gotta profile me like that?
Impersonating a police officer is, in fact, illegal.
MotionMan
No I don't say I'm a police officer. I just dress like one. People naturally assume I'm a police officer, and they're just as wrong as this cop is for assuming that people dressed like criminals are real criminals. Did he ask if they were criminals? No. He assumed they were criminals. You know what they say when people assume things - it makes an ass of u & me
