I wasn't aware there were any college football teams in the Caucus mountains.You ever notice how much more Caucasian college football teams became once they started paying the players.
Trump has a plan for flying cars.
If they can do this.. flying cars aren't far away but I don't see a market for it other than for billionaires.
Well crap. I knew I should have stuck with the word white.I wasn't aware there were any college football teams in the Caucus mountains.
I mean, if you're 'white' by most people standards but you're more native american than anything, can you really be called caucasian? I'm neither caucus nor asian.Well crap. I knew I should have stuck with the word white.
I had no idea Caucasian quit being a real thing. Probably because it's on every form we fill out here in the US.
I now have another conspiracy theory 😛
I think that if Kamala looses, Eric Adams will try to run for president, for the same legal reasons that Trump wants to become president again.
It's sad that a former President doesn't even understand how our elections work, or the purpose of primaries, which are not even a requirement. I think it's time to institute a test of basic goverment knowledge, that a current and prospective Congress member, and Presidential Canidate must pass, before being elligable to be in office/run. Knowledge, that every person should have learned in High school. I mean how can you be considered to run a country if you don't even have the first clue how out goverment and elections work.
It's sad that a former President doesn't even understand how our elections work, or the purpose of primaries, which are not even a requirement. I think it's time to institute a test of basic goverment knowledge, that a current and prospective Congress member, and Presidential Canidate must pass, before being elligable to be in office/run. Knowledge, that every person should have learned in High school. I mean how can you be considered to run a country if you don't even have the first clue how out goverment and elections work.
Come on...don't be lazy...what are you...a Gen Y?OK Boomer
It's estimated that only 30% to 40% of speech sounds can be lip-read even under the best conditions. A deaf person will usually need extra information to understand what’s being said.
Mean-word-recognition accuracy scores were barely greater than 10% correct. Further, any individual who achieved a CUNY lip-reading score of 30% correct is considered an outlier, giving them a T-score of nearly 80—three times the standard deviation from the mean. A lip-reading recognition accuracy score of 45% correct places an individual 5 standard deviations above the mean.
Plus, it's the NY Post, not exactly a bastion of integrity.Lip reading is really not an exact science, though.
Lip-reading - Ways deaf children learn to understand speech
Learn how children develop the ability to lip-read, and how you can make lip-reading easier.www.ndcs.org.uk
Biden might have been saying "he wrote a song about me" and Obama was just humoring him.
Trump is scared. Biden would have been easier to beat this time around. Kamala presents a real threat.
Come on...don't be lazy...what are you...a Gen Y?
Huh?Huh?
Have you referred to the DSM V or ICD? It's still sort of a developing thing, with Asperger's as a diagnosis only having been removed a decade or so back.The whole concept of neurodivergence/neurodiversity is doing my head in. Every single mainstream media article, blog, and forum post I see about it seems to disagree with every other one as to what those terms actually mean (and which conditions the former term encompasses) but few of them ever seriously acknowledge or attempt to even-handedly analyse the immense semantic, moral and political complexity of the topic (even the blogs of actual academics who've written books about the concept seem to be rather lacking in analysis).
Everyone involved seems to just assume their definition is self-evidently the 'correct' one and just proceeds uncritically from there.
Well, neurodivergence/neurodiversity (as opposed to "autism", say) are, I gather, political terms, not scientific/medical ones. And those are the things I see repeatedly referred to in the mainstream media, and which I find to be frustratingly ill-defined. I've become a bit fixated with the topic, and the more blogs and forums etc I see talking about it the more ill-defined those two terms seem to me to be (nobody who talks about them seems to fully explore the full political implications of the concepts, and everyone seems to define them differently).Have you referred to the DSM V or ICD? It's still sort of a developing thing, with Asperger's as a diagnosis only having been removed a decade or so back.
But with the way the sources you're referring to often play fast and loose with medical and scientific reports/data, yeah, you're bound to see conflicting information. Some of this comes from a difference in approach, as some consider it a condition to be cured, and others do not.