Conservatives push for Bill that would view Corporate Crimes as Honest Mistakes

[MongGrel]

That's also why my first inclination when seeing that you started this thread was "LOL, yet another faux outrage post by that idiot Indus."

Seems you are quoting the wrong person to begin with.

Search for threads started by you, dumbass. Dozens of threads for you to pretend you're outraged.

Why not pull that corn cob out of your butt someday.

Rage, rage, & more rage.

 

[BoberFett]

What, no meme?

 

[Jhhnn]

No, it's TRUE I don't like Loretta Lynch's pro stance on Civil asset forfeiture. Her words are that "it's a good tool", so again that is TRUE not "truthy" I would say nice try but as usual for you just pathetic.

Yes voting rights.. you just said you don't support an Indy voting in party primaries. Who was talking about states rights or federal? I was talking about YOUR view on it. Damn you don't even know WTF you just typed. here is your words Baffhhnn "If you're not a Party member it's only right that you have no say."

Here is the simple truth.. your party puts Sanders up or not, if they do I vote for him, if not I write his name in. I know you are (D) at all costs, but I'm a good candidate that supports the middle class and gets us out of the middle east at all costs.

Gawd that's an awkward little dance. Loretta Lynch is not a progressive Dem. She's not even a politician but rather a professional prosecutor. Expecting any of them to renounce civil forfeiture is misguided at best. The only one who ever has, even in part, was Eric Holder.

How many middle class people are affected by that, anyway? As many as say, Social Security? The ACA? Dodd-Frank? Education policy? Assistance to tide them over the rough spots? Unions? Free access to federal lands? Standards for air, water, food & drug purity & safety?

Hell, gay marriage probably affects more Americans directly than civil forfeiture which progressive Dems oppose anyway.

It's great that you support Bernie. Too bad you can't see that in context.

 

[TheSlamma]

Gawd that's an awkward little dance. Loretta Lynch is not a progressive Dem. She's not even a politician but rather a professional prosecutor. Expecting any of them to renounce civil forfeiture is misguided at best. The only one who ever has, even in part, was Eric Holder.

Who appointed Lynch? The next person with that job needs to appoint someone who would not support that bullshit

Eric Holder as I posted months ago, hardly did anything about it no matter how much you exaggerate it

How many middle class people are affected by that, anyway? As many as say, Social Security? The ACA? Dodd-Frank? Education policy? Assistance to tide them over the rough spots? Unions? Free access to federal lands? Standards for air, water, food & drug purity & safety?

The city of Philadelphia earns $6 MILLION dollars from it per year alone.

Okay lets play the numbers game, how many people are affected by mass shootings? it's a fraction of a percent, so I guess we better put down that fight right? That is what I thought. Piss poor argument as your usual and also not very democratic at all. Also the FDA is a joke, anyone that defends them has gone full retard.

Hell, gay marriage probably affects more Americans directly than civil forfeiture which progressive Dems oppose anyway.

They oppose and then do jack shit about it, my point for months and months that you can't seem to get, but we know why.. you are so biased you are blind.

It's great that you support Bernie. Too bad you can't see that in context.

I don't need your approval, I'm the one that thinks on his own about all of his decisions,you are just a robotic zealot that does what his party tells him to do, as far as I'm concerned if you ever move from Denver this place will be a much better city by leaps and bounds. So yes I believe even ONE person can make a difference.

The guy who can't even remember what he typed or quoted 1 sentence ago is talking about context, how ironic.

Your problem with me is that we both want a lot of the same things, I just want something to finally be done about it, you are 100% content with being lied to about it as long as the liar is your party.

 

[Jhhnn]

Who appointed Lynch? The next person with that job needs to appoint someone who would not support that bullshit

Eric Holder as I posted months ago, hardly did anything about it no matter how much you exaggerate it

I merely point out that he's the only one who did anything about it ever. It would be difficult to find a professional prsecutor who doesn't support it at some level or another

The city of Philadelphia earns $6 MILLION dollars from it per year alone.

Nothing short of congressional action can prevent that. Even then, such an effort might not be constitutional.

Okay lets play the numbers game, how many people are affected by mass shootings? it's a fraction of a percent, so I guess we better put down that fight right? That is what I thought. Piss poor argument as your usual and also not very democratic at all. Also the FDA is a joke, anyone that defends them has gone full retard.

They oppose and then do jack shit about it, my point for months and months that you can't seem to get, but we know why.. you are so biased you are blind.

I didn't ask about civil forfeiture but rather a lot of other stuff pertaining to whether or not Dems support the middle class. You merely dodge them & return to your pet issue, add gun control to the straw man line up.

I don't need your approval, I'm the one that thinks on his own about all of his decisions,you are just a robotic zealot that does what his party tells him to do, as far as I'm concerned if you ever move from Denver this place will be a much better city by leaps and bounds. So yes I believe even ONE person can make a difference.

The guy who can't even remember what he typed or quoted 1 sentence ago is talking about context, how ironic.

Your problem with me is that we both want a lot of the same things, I just want something to finally be done about it, you are 100% content with being lied to about it as long as the liar is your party.

Mighty fine row of straw men there.

Bernie clearly identifies more with Dems than Repubs or he'd be vying with Trump for the Repub nomination, don't you think? It's not as if he vilifies Dems the way you do, either, so maybe a rational person would choose to follow him in that regard if they choose to follow him at all.

I see the 16 states w/ open primaries as misguided. Colorado's caucus system is fine by me & of no real impediment to anybody who wants to have a say in the matter. Register as a Dem, go to the caucus so that your voice can be heard, change back to independent any time you want. Too easy, right? Obviously not enough bitter & misguided resentment.