Conservatives are for kneeling on the football field only for causes they approve

Page 9 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Mar 11, 2004
23,444
5,852
146
The absolute idiotic irony of it all is the party spreading these "vets before (insert racial boogieman here)" nonsense consistently votes AGAINST benefits for veterans and has done exactly fuck-all for homeless vets.

Yeah. And Turmp openly trashed multiple vets and their families and people think he gives a shit about the military. Thankfully the current leadership could see who Turmp was and made it clear they were not a pawn for him as he inevitably moved to attempting to keep power.
 
Nov 29, 2006
15,880
4,435
136
This is the most alarming thing about the current SCOTUS. It’s not just that they rule in an extreme fashion based on the facts, it’s when the facts are indisputably against them they invent ‘facts’ to reach their desired outcome.
arent we supposed to have “checks and balances” by the other branches of government? especially when they are outright lieing.
 

pmv

Lifer
May 30, 2008
15,142
10,039
136
No, because as long as they were not coerced, pressured, persuaded, or forced students, players, staff, or other participants can participate of their own choosing.

Seems to me when it's an adult in a position of authority and power, doing this in front of children that they have power over, on the very playing field where their authority is directly relevant, there's an implicit pressure involved.

Would it be treated the same way if the guy had started singing The Internationale and waving a hammer-and-sickle flag? Or the previously mentioned case of a Muslim engaging in Islamic prayer?
 
  • Like
Reactions: dank69 and Gardener

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,935
55,288
136
Seems to me when it's an adult in a position of authority and power, doing this in front of children that they have power over, on the very playing field where their authority is directly relevant, there's an implicit pressure involved.

Would it be treated the same way if the guy had started singing The Internationale and waving a hammer-and-sickle flag? Or the previously mentioned case of a Muslim engaging in Islamic prayer?
This is exactly the principle enshrined in establishment clause law in the US - or at least was until SCOTUS decided to play some more Calvinball.

It doesn’t matter if they FORCED anyone - this behavior by government officials in the course of their official duties is inherently coercive.
 

Gardener

Senior member
Nov 22, 1999
770
561
136
When I was young my dad took me and my little brother, every 3rd-4th Saturday afternoon, to at barbershop in Grand Haven Michigan. The guys would joke, and I would sit there soaking it all in while reading one of the well-worn Mad magazines which for this evangelical boy was mana from heaven.

Of the dozens of panels I still remember was a drawing of an old guy in a prison cell, building a model of the US Capitol out of bread crusts, an example of the human spirit versus the futility of the situation.

There was also a frontal drawing of Farrah Fawcett in a t-shirt, sitting on a toilet, surrounded by cherub angels flying through her farts. She was so hot back then.
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
22,343
4,973
136
Seems to me when it's an adult in a position of authority and power, doing this in front of children that they have power over, on the very playing field where their authority is directly relevant, there's an implicit pressure involved.

Would it be treated the same way if the guy had started singing The Internationale and waving a hammer-and-sickle flag? Or the previously mentioned case of a Muslim engaging in Islamic prayer?

I disagree. It was also after the game was over.

It should be as we have a freedom of speech. I don't like the hammer and sickle thing, but I don't have to like it.
 

pmv

Lifer
May 30, 2008
15,142
10,039
136
arent we supposed to have “checks and balances” by the other branches of government? especially when they are outright lieing.

Seems to me, as I said before, that most of the problem comes back to the bad design of the Senate. The checks and balances don't work because the Senate doesn't work, and it doesn't work because the 2-senators-per-state thing is hopelessly unbalanced with the current distribution of population and demographics (plus the philibuster, another case of unintended consequences).
The only part of the system that functions in a reasonable manner is the House of Representatives.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hal2kilo

JD50

Lifer
Sep 4, 2005
11,918
2,883
136
Was anyone coerced, pressured, persuaded, or forced to participate?
Has anyone claimed to have been?

No, I don't.

I think the SCOTUS made the right decision in this case.

How many times are you going to repeat lies about this case? https://www.vox.com/2022/6/27/23184...ton-school-football-coach-prayer-neil-gorsuch

One parent complained to the school district that his son “felt compelled to participate,” despite being an atheist, because the student feared “he wouldn’t get to play as much if he didn’t participate.”
 
Mar 11, 2004
23,444
5,852
146
You two are talking about a man that hates women because they might uslurp seamen from him on a submarine. He's basically a white version of Clarence Thomas. Which, because of affirmative action, he was prevented from becoming the "pube on a Coke can" arbiter of Truth, Justice, and the American Way.