Originally posted by: BigJ
If it happened, I would hope it'd alleviate some of the traffic there is between the main land and the Island. Getting off of LI is a b!tch anytime of the day.
While I agree with the LA part, the other part about LIE not being congested is false. There's traffic a lot of the time... even with the newly expanded HOV lane. You'd be going 20mph and suddenly speed up to highway speeds and wonder WTF just happened and why people were going so slow. There was no reason... just volume. And a few onramps like near the Cross Island is still a mess... near Queens Boulevard too. Many of the times, traffic starts all the way back at exit 39, or if you're lucky, you can go west until 36 without any traffic. Keep in mind NYC is down near exit 18... it's no fun. I use the service road and I'm not going that much faster.Originally posted by: BD2003
Originally posted by: BigJ
If it happened, I would hope it'd alleviate some of the traffic there is between the main land and the Island. Getting off of LI is a b!tch anytime of the day.
? The only time I ever see traffic going to or coming from the city on either the LIE or northern state is during rush hour or if theres an accident.
You havent seen traffic till youve been to LA. Those roads are clogged 24/7.
Originally posted by: rh71
While I agree with the LA part, the other part about LIE not being congested is false. There's traffic a lot of the time... even with the newly expanded HOV lane. You'd be going 20mph and suddenly speed up to highway speeds and wonder WTF just happened and why people were going so slow. There was no reason... just volume. And a few onramps like near the Cross Island is still a mess... near Queens Boulevard too. Many of the times, traffic starts all the way back at exit 39, or if you're lucky, you can go west until 36 without any traffic. Keep in mind NYC is down near exit 18... it's no fun. I use the service road and I'm not going that much faster.Originally posted by: BD2003
Originally posted by: BigJ
If it happened, I would hope it'd alleviate some of the traffic there is between the main land and the Island. Getting off of LI is a b!tch anytime of the day.
? The only time I ever see traffic going to or coming from the city on either the LIE or northern state is during rush hour or if theres an accident.
You havent seen traffic till youve been to LA. Those roads are clogged 24/7.
Anyway, about connecting with CT, I wouldn't have any problems with it so long as it doesn't cause an increase in taxes. I agree it would alleviate some "heading out of town" traffic. The ferry that can take on cars is expensive, so I hear. You know the Seaford Oyster Bay expressway (Rt. 135) runs north/south and at the end of the northern point (in Woodbury) the highway just stops. Just paint a picture... if it keeps going, it hits CT. I'd be for that for sure... not even the end of LI... it'd be the middle... straight up to Stamford... 17 short miles.
pic
I'd definitely go for Sagtikos --> Bridgeport.Originally posted by: BD2003
Stamford is so close to the city that itd be a waste. Anything west past pt jeff and new haven would be almost pointless. pt jeff and bridgeport are as close as youre going to get until you get to the north fork.
Originally posted by: So
>99% of the us population doesn't care. as for the rest of you, if you want it, spend your own money.
I thought I remembered something about stopping it purposely... do you have any sources ? I can't seem to find any.Originally posted by: forcesho
they stop that seaford oyster bay expressway to keep people out of CT... CT fight like hell to stop it.. they almost build that bridge..
it would have been great for me.. I could have move to LI and goto work in CT instead of living in the city and commute to CT... I know a lot of people that live in LI would love it too...
http://maps.google.com/maps?q=seaford+o...7105,0.013179&t=h&num=10&start=0&hl=en
thats where it ended
I thought I remembered something about stopping it purposely... do you have any sources ? I can't seem to find any.
No entrance-exit points north of NY 25A. You are putting a highway through the homes of some very rich and powerful people, but this plan seems like a good one.
Originally posted by: forcesho
I thought I remembered something about stopping it purposely... do you have any sources ? I can't seem to find any.
No entrance-exit points north of NY 25A. You are putting a highway through the homes of some very rich and powerful people, but this plan seems like a good one.
On June 20, 1973, Governor Nelson Rockefeller made this statement concerning the Oyster Bay-Rye Bridge:
After long and careful consideration and review of all factors concerned, I have decided to discontinue plans for the construction of the Oyster Bay-Rye Bridge.
This has not been an easy decision. There are strong arguments for the bridge, and I have vigorously supported this proposal. It is part of a long-standing plan to link Long Island to the mainland and to enhance the role of the Island in the commerce and industry of the state.
However, in recent years the people of our state and the country have gradually come to adopt new values in relation to our environment and evidenced a willingness to forgo certain economic advantages to achieve these values. The Oyster Bay-Rye Bridge has become a lightning rod in this period of evolution. Therefore, after a thorough review of all the factors and after consulting with representatives of environmental, labor, business and other groups, and with individuals, I have come to the conclusion that we should cease our plans to build the Oyster Bay-Rye Bridge.
Although the bridge would bring many real benefits and fill some real needs, obviously it would lead to large-scale disruption of existing patterns of life. We must continue to grow, and must continue to grow in a way that is compatible with valid environmental objectives.
Therefore, I believe we should concentrate our efforts on extending and improving our mass transit systems to better serve the needs of the people on an economical and efficient basis, while at the same time undertaking necessary highway projects throughout the state that do not involve ecological problems.
Although the original proposal was defeated, plans for a bridge across Long Island Sound continued to top the agenda among transportation officials for many years. In 1979, before a meeting organized by state and county officials in Hauppauge, New York, Robert Moses, by now a 91-year-old advisor emeritus for the MTA, repeated the need for a bridge:
Long Island needs a Sound Crossing, but where? Westchester needs a Sound Crossing, but where? Connecticut needs a Sound Crossing, but where? It was clear to us 20 years ago, and is more obvious today, that we need a Sound Crossing for 40,000 to 50,000 daily users at a location that will avoid circuitous, time-consuming, energy wasting, totally unnecessary trips through New York City. We need immediately a bridge from Oyster Bay to Rye built from income derived from users.
Originally posted by: BigJ
If it happened, I would hope it'd alleviate some of the traffic there is between the main land and the Island. Getting off of LI is a b!tch anytime of the day.