rommelrommel
Diamond Member
- Dec 7, 2002
- 4,433
- 3,221
- 146
He didn't abdicate and nothing has happened geopolitically so I would say your "leak" was mostly wrong.
Go advanced.Wow I guess the leak was right.
How do I edit the title to say: CONFIRMED?
He didn't abdicate and nothing has happened geopolitically so I would say your "leak" was mostly wrong.
Wow I guess the leak was right.
How do I edit the title to say: CONFIRMED?
You found out Abdullah was going to no longer be king a week before it happened. Not totally right, but I challenge anybody else here to bring a geopolitically significant leak that ends up being legit.
I will edit it tomorrow morning ugh I should not have eaten all these gummy strips. Goodnight.
Crown Prince Salman will likely be the next up. But again he is no spring chicken, he is 79, and is believed to have Alzheimers and Dementia for years now. He has also had a stroke, leading to his left arm not working well.
Only remaining sons interested in the job is Prince Talal and Muqrin, but Talal has angered most the Saudi family and Muqrin is the son of a concubine (something most Princes won't allow).
After those two, its the hundreds of grandsons and the real Game of Thrones.
It's potentially a massive game changer. Whomever sits on the Saudi throne has nearly absolute power. He can have people executed or change foreign policy on a whim, as long as he doesn't upset the religious clerks.I'm sure this will be a game changer..... lol, ok, I tried to keep a straight face as long as possible![]()
Which is the ultimatum the US should have delivered to the House of Saud on 9/12. Too bad Bush put the family business ahead of the national interest.If Salman decides he wants to stop being two faced about the whole Religious extremism issue it could go either way, he could give all authority to the clerks, who will no doubt steer the country on an even more insane salafist direction, or he could have any clerks that preaches extremism put to death and wipe it out overnight.
I am no expert on the house of saud, but I can tell you that this is 1) not good for us and 2) good for Isis. This is crazy!
Edit: Sad day for the 40 kids and 10 wives he leaves behind!
It is the attitude of the ruler w/ respect to how his wants to handle the financial/oil power crisisWhy? Nothings going to change in Saudi Arabia just because they changed kings. Its all the same inbred bedoin family.
.How many Saudi women could drive during Abdulla's reign? None, and they must have a "guardian" with them at all times.
I find this story about the Queen of England driving Abdulla around hillarious.
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/driving-king-anecdote-goes-viral/
Must have scared him to death. Probably thought of it every time the topic of letting Saudi women drive comes up.
We do NOT cozy up to a country that puts homosexuals to death. We cozy up to a country with buttloads of cheap oil which, um, happens to put homosexuals to death. That's completely different . . . somehow.I was watching foreign news this morning, and a Middle East 'expert' was being interviewed about Abdullah's reign. He said that due to the King's human rights record, terrorism was not fought, it was cultivated.
I still can't believe we cozy up to a country that puts homosexuals to death. I guess we need to retain the right to drive thirsty vehicles though.
Saudi Arabia is the source of the insanity. The Saudis fund the religious schools cranking out the nutjobs around the globe.We do NOT cozy up to a country that puts homosexuals to death. We cozy up to a country with buttloads of cheap oil which, um, happens to put homosexuals to death. That's completely different . . . somehow.
Even more sad, with the notable exceptions of Israel and Jordan this is the sanest country in the area. At least now that Lebanon has been overrun and Islamicized.
That's true, and I suspect those two things are connected. Finance the hard core Islamist/Salafist schools in other nations and draw your own crazies to those countries.Saudi Arabia is the source of the insanity. The Saudis fund the religious schools cranking out the nutjobs around the globe.
your not too bright are you??Problem is, Israel is happy to keep the Salafists in power because it helps their "poor me" narrative they use to distract from various atrocities too many to name. Israel has no beef with ISIS. They are buddies, and it won't be long until Obama puts his foot down on Bibi's bullshit.
__________________
In the same sense as the Fukashima nuclear plant was "not too successful" in riding out a tsunami.your not too bright are you??
We do NOT cozy up to a country that puts homosexuals to death. We cozy up to a country with buttloads of cheap oil which, um, happens to put homosexuals to death. That's completely different . . . somehow.
Even more sad, with the notable exceptions of Israel and Jordan this is the sanest country in the area. At least now that Lebanon has been overrun and Islamicized.
