Originally posted by: ronnn
The 200w rumour is too much! The fact is that every new generation is using more power. This is not good and can't sustain itself. If the r600 is faster at all, there will come situations where it is 40% faster - but that don't make it right. Just because the G80 only uses a bit more power than the r580 at load (quite a bit more at idle), doesn't make it more efficient. My point was all of these companies have work to do here. Even vista idles at slightly higher consumption. This is insane - we should be reducing usage. Am personally thinking that maybe should just get a ps3 or xbox360 - and a quiet, efficient multimedia machine.
Well you have to take into consideration that you cannot simply compare the power requirements of a D3D10 gpu with these of aD3D9 gpu.. A D3D10 due to its architectural structure and move towards what we can call a GPGPU is logically consuming more power at idle.. The introduction of geometry shader in the unified shader technology does make the difference.. Geometry units cannot stay idle. This means that the gpu is considered to be in idle mode, but actually it is in a "hybrid" mode, a state between 2d/3d actually.. Thus we see higher idle power output..But you are right..Both companies must give us lower power and more efficient gpus..
As for the XBOX360 (because I have one), yes it's a good alternative for the time being.. But nowhere near efficient for what it provides and most importantly not quieter..
Originally posted by: CaiNaM
umm.. you mean kinda like ibm w/ netburst?![]()
Was about time that someone would mention it..