When it runs, it's unlike anything else - and to be honest, it's not that expensive. Tires and brakes are cheap enough. Maintaining some zany V8 would pobably cost me as much during the goldilocks phase, never mind the terrible teens.
Would a Miata be cheaper? Yeah, definitely. But I would expect most MR2s to be in a similar price range maintenance wise now (especially, if you start breaking axles

), and the Elise is that much more engaging when you're driving.
I think I need to treat myself to an A110 test-drive one of these days, although I have no clue where the used car market for those sits. And the relative lack of electronics on the Lotus still makes it more of a long-term car, compared to something out of the 2010s, with screens and compressors and electric windows and central locking and automatic gearboxes.
Proper sporty Boxsters are also not really comparable, experience-wise. 70/80's 911s might be close in driving purity, but I cannot imagine that they'll be gentler on my pocketbook
I'm sure most people who have a sporty car pay more on the leasing rate than I am spending on maintenance, and after ten years of ownership, I think I spent a total of 40-50k euro (excluding fuel, but including buying the car) on around 20k miles of driving. For a second car, I don't think that's too bad. But yeah, my primary car has cost me easily 5k euro less (even with two new sets of tires, and a fancy set of golden winter wheels) and it has covered 80k miles in the same time (around 60k in 8 years of my ownership, I think). But one of those is a hobby, and the other is transportation
