TheSlamma
Diamond Member
- Sep 6, 2005
- 7,625
- 5
- 81
Oh man if only I cared about you and what you think.ban. keep your political shit out of my thread!
Oh man if only I cared about you and what you think.ban. keep your political shit out of my thread!
Hope you have insurance
Why?
They wouldn't pay anyway.
They would use an excuse like "Act of God".
My apartment in the Springs for school is really close to the evac area, hopefully it is still there in August![]()
Yet it's all the rich republicans building their houses right in the middle of everything so nothing can be control burned.. I remember going up 285 in the 80's and 90's and you were well into the mountains by the time you hit fairplay, now it's like a 40 mile long concrete mountain "town". So they don't want the control burs either.
the pine beetle destroyed this place and no one wants to either control burn it whether they are left or right.. no one has the money to remove all the dead trees and replant beetle resistant evergreens.. this is another example of not spending the money up front and then instead spending 8X the amount in the disaster event.
You're good if it's east of I-25.
You're also good if it's not in Mountain Shadows or Peregrine, and most of Rockrimmon.
Remember. Tree huggers are against controlled burns![]()
That may have been true in the 80s, but not anymore.
Why?
They wouldn't pay anyway.
They would use an excuse like "Act of God".
Regional disasters are big news to local residents but are of passing interest to people far away. When the media reports on a story like a wildfire at the national level, the viewers go "wow", and lose interest quickly.
The only thing that seemed remarkable to me was the fact that fire fighting air force planes sat idle on the runway ten miles from the Colorado Springs fire until someone at the Pentagon was informed that the Air Force Academy might be threatened.
I don't know about Frontrangia but here in Arizona there are controlled burns underway throughout most of the year. The effectiveness of greenies in affecting forest/land policies is highly overstated.When was the last controlled burn?
National Forest Service is prevented from doing them.
They've managed to keep all of our firefighters safe, to date, thankfully.
Some fantastic pictures:
http://blogs.denverpost.com/capture...ires-waldo-canyon-fire-colorado-springs/5732/
Remember. Tree huggers are against controlled burns![]()
Lets set the record straight: The Sierra Club and other environmental groups have for years advocated protecting old growth and other large, fire-resistant trees while allowing low-intensity fires to burn, supplementing them when necessary with intentional, controlled burns. We support thinning of small trees, and we endorse the National Fire Plan, a federal/state effort that funds controlled burns and encourages the removal of brush and other fire hazards near communities and homes. We realize that it wont be easy to return natural fire patterns to the West. "Putting fire back into the landscape is not the simple reverse of taking it out," writes Pyne.
At least 346 homes destroyed in Colorado Springs.
They've managed to keep all of our firefighters safe, to date, thankfully.
Some fantastic pictures:
http://blogs.denverpost.com/capture...ires-waldo-canyon-fire-colorado-springs/5732/
Is this all just a promo for The Hobbit?
