• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Coffeelake thread, benchmarks, reviews, input, everything.

Page 16 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
I will repost from locked thread since there I have not got answer to my question:

In my country Asrock H270 mITX mobo costs less than some B250 MoBos. I don't believe we will see price changes between MoBos from X2XX chipset to X3XX chipset for Intel platform. So here is a question, actually.

If I have a MoBo that has 2666 MHz memory compatibility, and CPU that is locked and capable of running 2400 MHz, can I still buy 2666 Mhz and run it full speed?

Also. So now we know that only K CPUs are getting price hike, vs Kaby Lake? All other SKUs have the same prices?
Best bet, check from a forum (about your motherboard and chip combo) or google it. What chip are you running? I'd check ARK and the mobo manufacturer's QVL list too.
 
The maximum memory speed should be the lowest of the two limits. So in this case, the IMC limiting you to DDR4-2400 would set your maximum RAM speed.
 
But expand that to include HyperThreading on Intel, and SMT on Ryzen, and run a core/core, thread/thread, clock/clock comparison, and see where the "IPC comparison" lies. It may even show Ryzen coming out ahead, in their "measured multi-threaded IPC", due to the superiority of their SMT implementation.

True for Cinebench, not true for many games where turning off SMT actually increases performance, especially minimum FPS considerably. Yes, HT can also have a slight negative effect but never as severe as SMT. There are always 2-sides to the coin.

There is not denying intel is the ST king and that ST matters greatly for everyday use and gaming. However you can also argue it's not worth the added price for some users.
 
Best bet, check from a forum (about your motherboard and chip combo) or google it. What chip are you running? I'd check ARK and the mobo manufacturer's QVL list too.
From what I see, Core i3's have 2400 MHz memory controller. Every MoBo with B360, H370 should be able to run RAM with 2666 MHz. And this is the context.

If I will buy ASRock H370 mITX MoBo, and 4C/4T 8100T, that has 2400 MHz controller, will I be perfectly fine running 2666 MHz RAM in this setup?
 
Here's hoping anandtech has their review up thursday along with 8600/8700k overclocking results in each of their benchmarks. The 8700k will be an instabuy if it manages 5ghz on air across all cores, which looks likely. 14nm ++ looks amazing from these early leaks. I wonder if Intel has a 14nm +++ in the works for the next refresh if 10nm isn't ready.
 
From what I see, Core i3's have 2400 MHz memory controller. Every MoBo with B360, H370 should be able to run RAM with 2666 MHz. And this is the context.

If I will buy ASRock H370 mITX MoBo, and 4C/4T 8100T, that has 2400 MHz controller, will I be perfectly fine running 2666 MHz RAM in this setup?
I believe so. Intel raised Coffeelake's memory support to 2666 MHz. All the same, bios always has a say about these things.
 
Here's hoping anandtech has their review up thursday along with 8600/8700k overclocking results in each of their benchmarks. The 8700k will be an instabuy if it manages 5ghz on air across all cores, which looks likely. 14nm ++ looks amazing from these early leaks. I wonder if Intel has a 14nm +++ in the works for the next refresh if 10nm isn't ready.
I don't know about you, but I hope they do. A lot of their products will benefit from these node tweaks in the following years.
 
From what I see, Core i3's have 2400 MHz memory controller. Every MoBo with B360, H370 should be able to run RAM with 2666 MHz. And this is the context.

If I will buy ASRock H370 mITX MoBo, and 4C/4T 8100T, that has 2400 MHz controller, will I be perfectly fine running 2666 MHz RAM in this setup?
Can't do memory overclock unless processor and motherboard are designated for overclocking. Memory will default to frequency defined in the module's SPD (serial presence detect), usually 2133 or 2400 MT/s.
 
Coffeelake will support 2666MHz out of the box. Which chip are you planning to get?
Motherboards will support 2666, and 2400 MHz at least B360 and H370, chipsets.

Core i3 8100 will support 2400 MHz, and Core i5 and i7 - 2666, and higher.

And this is the most confusing thing with launch.

So no matter what MoBo I will buy, I will have 2666 MHz memory support. But if I will buy Core i3 will I be able to put there 2666 MHz RAM, and will it work, without any problem?
 
Motherboards will support 2666, and 2400 MHz at least B360 and H370, chipsets.

Core i3 8100 will support 2400 MHz, and Core i5 and i7 - 2666, and higher.

And this is the most confusing thing with launch.

So no matter what MoBo I will buy, I will have 2666 MHz memory support. But if I will buy Core i3 will I be able to put there 2666 MHz RAM, and will it work, without any problem?
In that case, no.
 
About all the recent questions regarding using memory modules rated for higher frequency than processor can support (without overclock): The higher-rated memory will work, just not at its rated frequency. Memory frequency to default to what's included in SPD (2133 or 2400 MT/s, from my knowledge), and if the SPD frequency is below the processor's maximum memory frequency, in BIOS, you can tune the memory frequency and timings up to the maximum processor supported frequency.
 
About all the recent questions regarding using memory modules rated for higher frequency than processor can support (without overclock): The higher-rated memory will work, just not at its rated frequency. Memory frequency to default to what's included in SPD (2133 or 2400 MT/s, from my knowledge), and if the SPD frequency is below the processor's maximum memory frequency, in BIOS, you can tune the memory frequency and timings up to the maximum processor supported frequency.
Except, if you use a "Z" board, you can overclock the RAM to your heart's desire, up to the limits of the memory controller on the CPU, and your RAM's capability.

And since the only initial chipset on boards for Coffee Lake are going to be "Z" (370) boards, there you have it. Memory overclocking, from the get-go. So this supposed 2667 limit, is really no limit at all, unless you are using a later 2018 lower-chipset board.
 
True for Cinebench, not true for many games where turning off SMT actually increases performance, especially minimum FPS considerably. Yes, HT can also have a slight negative effect but never as severe as SMT. There are always 2-sides to the coin.

There is not denying intel is the ST king and that ST matters greatly for everyday use and gaming. However you can also argue it's not worth the added price for some users.
Am I missing something here? SMT vs HT.
 
Am I missing something here? SMT vs HT.
c924abdcacba6d85c70dd47cd114aee7.png
 
f181b9014a90f603f59053493212b31bb051eda4.jpg

so I just saw this reposted in hardforum, original source Baidu. Can't give it much credibility, what do you guys think? DDR4 speeds trigger my fake-meter up to the redzone, and so does LGA1161.

100% fake. Cannon Lake server was cancelled long ago (replaced by Cascade Lake), Tiger LakeX is not a thing (after Ice Lake-Server comes Sapphire Rapids), an AVX512-enabled Cannonlake 8750K doesn't make any sense; a new arch would mean a new product line.

DDR4-2800 is also wrong for the 8xxx X chips, next step after DDR4-2666 is DDR4-2933.

Basically this table is garbage.
 
Back
Top